employer must have ‘strong basis in evidence‚’ that will be subject to ‘disparate impact liability’ if it fails to take discriminatory action.” Similar to City of Richmond v. Croson‚ the court declared there was not sufficient evidence to require special actions to be taken to fight
Premium Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Reverse discrimination United States Constitution
even though it was not a typical issue of support‚ their approach in their scope of review did not have to differ. If the parents had included a stipulation into their divorce agreement‚ as what occurred in Emrick v. Emrick ‚ the Court would likely have decided differently. In this case‚ there was no agreement but rather‚ at the time of the initial order by the trial court‚ the free will of the father to financially contribute to his son’s postsecondary
Premium Marriage Divorce University
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY: WORLDWIDE TELECOMMUNICATIONS Annotated Bibliography for Cultural Changes Inside Worldwide Telecommunications Pawny Abbasy‚ Jason Blanchard‚ Angela Zelandi University of Phoenix Essentials of College Writing Instructor: David Soyka Carte‚ Penny and Fox‚ Chris‚ (2004)‚ Bridging the Culture Gap: A Practical Guide to International Business Communication‚ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data‚ Retrieved November 17‚ 2006 from: http://www.amazon.com/gp
Premium Corporation Discrimination Race
The Supreme Court case of Gregg V. Georgia dealt with administrative law‚ which is the legal field that regulates the due process clause in the Constitution. The clause is about the Government having the obligations to respect and uphold the legal rights of American people during and after they are arrested. Troy Leon Gregg and other inmates on death row believed that the death sentence was in direct violation of the 8th and 14th Amendments‚ which dealt with cruel and unusual punishment and that
Premium Capital punishment Gregg v. Georgia Capital punishment in the United States
appropriate. In addition‚ MCI is looking for which way will be most effective financing. (2) How did the problems arise? Antitrust settlement between AT&T and the U.S Department of Justice in January 1982 had significantly altered the economic landscape for MCI. Due to the settlement‚ AT&T broke up their long distance telecommunications division by early 1984. This gave MCI the opportunity and threat at the same time. As an opportunity‚ MCI might
Premium Economics Management Finance
Assignment 2 Planning the Future at Galaxy MARSHAL A. TODMAN BMGT 364 Management and Organization Theory 1 October 2017 Professor Michael Heil Planning the Future at Galaxy Part one Introduction Galaxy has been a mainstay in the world manufactured toys for over six decades. Their ability to create inspirational toys kids of all ages has been renown. These toys over the years have helped kids delve into the world of space exploration and has lit the “spark” to them realizing their dreams
Premium 1970 1986 1943
Year 12 Legal Studies Crime Assessment Steven Fraser - R v Fraser - Murder of children Legal Citation: R v Fraser [2003] NSWSC 965 and R v Fraser [2004] NSWSC 53 Elements of the Offence: Steven Fraser murdered his three children – Ashley (7)‚ Ryan (5)‚ and Jarrod (4) – on the weekend of the 18 – 19 August‚ 2001. They were staying in his Caringbah apartment on a custody visit‚ where Steven was living after separating with his wife Maria Chona two months prior. Ryan and Jarrod were given doses
Premium Murder Crime Capital punishment
Case Study: Kim v. Son To summarize the case of Kim v. Son‚ Jinsoo Kim invested in two of Stephen Son’s corporations‚ which eventually failed‚ and Kim lost his money. Son felt bad‚ he and Kim got together and became very intoxicated and signed a “contract” in blood‚ stating that Son promised to pay Kim the money he lost and Kim agreed not to sue him. As it turned out‚ when Son sobered up he refused to keep his promise to pay Kim‚ so Kim filed a lawsuit based on this bloody contract. The judge
Premium Common law Contract Law
Terry v. Ohio: Martin McFadden was a police officer in Ohio who noticed that two individuals appeared to be acting suspiciously. While watching these people from his police car‚ Officer McFadden noticed that these two men appeared to be planning a criminal attack. The two men were walking back and forth in front of a store while conspiring with each other. When McFadden approached the two men and identified himself as a law enforcement officer‚ he walked them down the street and frisked them for
Premium Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Crime
charges. The Riley v. California case was argued April 29‚ 2014 and decided on June 25‚ 2014.The main issue in this case was how the police officer searched his phone without a warrant then arrested him and if this action violated the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment clearly states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ houses‚ papers‚ and effects‚ against unreasonable searches and seizures…”.
Premium