in any school building‚ on school grounds‚ in any school vehicle or at any school-sponsored activity.4” .The image Renville provided clearly violates the school guidelines and does not pass the “Tinker Test”‚ therefore the ruling delivered in Tinker v Des Moines independent Community School District does not apply to the supposed infringement on Renville’s freedom of speech
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution High school
Pat Employee‚ submits the following Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. I. INTRODUCTION This Court should grant the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment because this Court should apply the law of East Kansas. This case involves a conflict of law issue because West Kansas’s law provides that worker’s compensation is the exclusive remedy for employees‚ who are victims of intentional torts‚ while East Kansas says that worker’s compensation is not the exclusive remedy
Premium Conflict of laws Choice of law Jurisdiction
www.jntuworld.com www.jwjobs.net INTRODUCTION The field of telecommunications has evolved from a stage when signs‚ drum beats and semaphores were used for long distance communication to a stage when electrical‚ radio and electro-optical signals are being used. Optical signals produced by laser sources and carried by ultra-pure glass fibers are recent additions to the field. Telecommunication networks carry information signals among entries which are geographically far apart. An entity maybe a computer
Premium Telephone exchange Telephone
Unit 5 Marketing Travel and Tourism products and services The first pieces of work require for Unit 5 is going to ask for a definition and the function of marketing. Advertising ‚promotion products profits Definitions of Marketing The management process responsible for identifying‚ anticipating and satisfying customer requirements profitably. (source: www.cim.co.uk) This is all very well for privately owned businesses. Businesses have two different of section. a type of Businesses are
Premium Business Profit Marketing
younger workers due to stereotypes surrounding older workers’ productivity and cost. In case of Zimpfer V. Palm Beach County case‚ Mr. Bryce Zimpfer applied for the position of employee relations manager. However‚ the department filled the position with Mr. Brad Merriman‚ aged 33. Although Brad had less experience than Bryce‚ he was appointed as the new relations manager. Nonetheless‚ this is a case of age based discrimination. Since Brad has
Premium
ASHCROFT v. FREE SPEECH COALITION 198 F. 3d 1083‚ affirmed. ( No. 00-795 ) (6-3) Kennedy‚ A. for the majority. FACTS: In Ashcroft v. The Free Speech Coalition‚ the Supreme Court was given the task of deciding whether or not the Child Pornography Prevention Act or CPPA violated the First Amendment. If a violation of the First Amendment was proven the CPPA would have been found unconstitutional. The Free Speech Coalition‚ a part of the adult entertainment industry‚ felt that the language and ultimately
Premium
------------------------------------------------- Future "Futurity" redirects here. For the ship‚ see MV Futurity. "Near future" redirects here. For the song‚ see The Near Future. For other uses‚ see Future (disambiguation). Time | | Major Concepts | Past ♦ Present ♦ Future Eternity Arguments for eternity | Broad Studies | Chronology History (Paleontology) Futurology | Philosophy | Presentism ♦ Eternalism‚ Fatalism Philosophy of Space and Time | Religion | Creation End Times Day of Judgement
Premium Future Time Forecasting
Derek Brown Professor Janet Smith Employment Law BA370 1 August 2011 BACHELDER V. AMERICAN WEST AIRLINES The legal issue in this case is Penny Bachelder claims her employer‚ America West Airlines‚ violated the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ("FMLA" or "the Act") when it terminated her in 1996 for poor attendance. Bachelder countered that according to the regulations implementing the FMLA‚ she was entitled to have her leave eligibility calculated by the method most favorable to her. Under
Premium United States Law Employment
Contribution Required Of Excess Insurer Where It Did Not Consent To Settlement In February‚ the California Court of Appeal ruled in Doe Run Resources Corp v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York that an excess insurer did not have to contribute to the settlement where the insured failed to obtain its consent before signing the settlement agreement. The case involved a complaint filed in 2001 by residents of Herculaneum‚ Missouri alleging that the defendant mining-company‚ Doe Run’s‚ lead and cadium smelting
Premium Contract Supreme Court of the United States Law
Korematsu V. United States was a court case during the time of World War II. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor‚ people of Japanese descent were considered threats. As a result‚ Franklin Roosevelt issued the Executive Order 9066 on February 19‚ 1942. This Order demanded that each and every person of Japanese descent be moved to internment camps‚ regardless of citizenship. Fred Korematsu‚ a Japanese American citizen‚ refused to leave his home to go to the internment camp. Therefore‚ he was convicted
Premium United States World War II President of the United States