Smoking kills? (Should Smoking be banned in Public Places?) Looking at the health hazards‚ including lung cancer‚ impotency‚ asthma and heart disease‚ which smoking can cause‚ banning it in public places is long time due. However‚ this is just one of the viewpoints. Most smokers and many restaurant owners will sing an altogether different tune with regards to banning smoking in public places. So‚ let’s get to the bottom of this debate by looking at its pros and cons. Arguments for... Let’s
Premium Alcoholic beverage Smoking Nicotine
going to regret about smoking. You are not only going to die early but‚ you will develop illnesses. Smoking will make you look stylish to your friends when you are teenager‚ but you are only a teenager for less than ten years of your life. What’s going to happen if you keep smoking? You will be addicted to it‚ and it will destroy your body and make your face look monstrous. It will cause many health problems. Even people who do not smoke are also affected‚ and suffer illness. Smoking cigarettes will lead
Premium Smoking Cigarette Passive smoking
Smoking should be banned. Smoking is a practice in which a substance‚ most commonly tobacco or cannabis‚ is burned and the smoke is tasted or inhaled. The most common method of smoking today is through cigarettes‚ primarily industrially manufactured but also hand-rolled from loose tobacco and rolling paper. Today we are more aware about how bad smoking is for our health. Smoking should be banned or restricted in almost all public places because it has been shown to be dangerous to health‚
Free Tobacco Nicotine Smoking
should be banned in public places due to extreme health risks. Health experts‚ politicians‚ business people and the general public have debated a smoking ban on cigarettes for many years. However the issue of smoking bans is complex and there are several things that must be considered. In addition to the health advantages there are also questions concerning the economic impact on smoking bans on state and local communities‚ and the rights of smokers and non- smokers. Smoking in public places should
Premium Smoking Smoking ban Passive smoking
Title: Anti-smoking Policy should be executed in Hong Kong _____________________________________________________________________ Abstract In recent years‚ a lot of people died every year of smoking or second –hand smoking. Furthermore‚ some citizens argue that anti-smoking policy should be executed. In this paper‚ an attempt has been made to study the impact of anti-smoking policy through examining both supporting and opposing arguments. The aim of this paper is to use a number of examples from
Premium Smoking Smoking ban Lung cancer
about smoking inpublic places. Smokers feel it is their right to smoke where and when theywant. On the other hand non-smokers feel smokers violate their rights and endanger there life. Smoking causes heart disease‚ lung cancer and otherserious illnesses. Cigarette smoking is the number one cause of lungcancer. A substantial number of lung cancers that occur in non-smokers canbe attributed to involuntary smoking. There are some parts in the UnitedStates where you can smoke in public places‚ on the
Premium Lung cancer Smoking Tobacco
in today’s society. The smoking bans around the United States are one of the issues. Many people are for the smoking bans‚ because they help reduce the amount of second hand smoke. Second hand smoke along with direct smoke can cause cancer in the lungs of adults and children. Others believe it’s against the rights of a person. The government telling people what to do is going against the Constitution. The smoking ban harms the rights of American people in public places. It is the right of smokers
Premium United States Smoking ban Passive smoking
Debate on Smoking Should the Government be able to control what we do in our own lives‚ or what we do to our own bodies? Would you want a communist country‚ Where the government controlled what you do every single day? In my opinion if you banned smoking it would just be the start down a path that could allow other unconstitutional laws and freedoms being stricken from the American population. The main reason why the government has not ban this drug yet is because of the economy‚ cigarettes alone
Premium Tobacco Cigarette Nicotine
benefits to a smoking ban on a college campus‚ many smokers would not agree to the benefits. They would much rather argue that a smoking ban would be against their rights. A smoker would voice the opinion that it is unfair he or she cannot indulge in an activity he or she sees as relaxing. In others words‚ participating in the act of smoking is self- choice. “Many have argued that the taxes spent on cigarette purchases have been used to fund the very places where they are being banned from”( Time
Free Smoking Tobacco Tobacco smoking
towards active smokers. Let’s have a look it in detail. Based on The Tax and Expense Director‚ in 2013‚ there are 2.300 cigarette factories that they are consisted of big and small scale class production‚ and there are about 40 million people who are smoking. However‚ in 2014‚ this amount whether cigarette factory or the smoker increases almost 2-fold from previous year (3.800 cigarette manufactures and 52 million smokers). These data indicate that cigarette production and sale affects the increase of
Premium Cigarette Carbon dioxide World Health Organization