DECISION-MAKING OF JURIES Characteristics of the Defendant In an ideal world‚ a jury would be made up of unbiased and unprejudiced people‚ intelligent enough to comprehend the evidence and with the necessary verbal and social skills to contribute to discussion. In the real world however‚ research has shown that jury verdicts are influenced by irrelevant aspects of the defendant such as their physical attractiveness‚ gender‚ race and even their accent. Physical attractiveness: It does
Premium Jury Jury trial
Causes‚ Fools Decide Them. Socrates‚ an Athenian philosopher who lived from 469 BC until his very unnecessary death in 399 BC‚ has had his wisdom called into question many times since he has been studied. But to know whether some is wise‚ we must first know what it means to be wise. According to Websters Dictionary‚ to be is wise is : (1) having or showing good judgment; (2) informed; (3) learned; (4) shrewd amd cunning. From this definition‚ it is clear to me that Socrates was wise in every aspect
Premium Socrates Socratic method Plato
through the witnesses and other evidence that will be introduced during the trial - Goals of Opening Statements: 1. introduce the case theme to the court and jury - the opening statement is like a preview or synopsis of what is to follow. - take this opportunity
Premium Jury Law Court
insight into the educational theories of Socrates. It is rather difficult to gain any information from first hand written accounts of Socrates work as he hardly ever took down notes and the only accounts that have stood the test of time are those that were documented by Plato‚ a student of Socrates. In actual fact most of what we know is from later people such as Aristophanes‚ Xenophen‚ Plato and Aristotle. These accounts are what have been formulated into Socrates theories. This poses some questions
Premium Plato Philosophy Socrates
possible. There is extensive screening before every jury is produced to make sure that there is no potential bias in any of the members that would hinder the objectivity and integrity of the case. Additionally‚ judges are intensely trained and sworn to carry out justice as impartially as possible. With that being said‚ time and time again juries and judges are frequently dispensing differing prison lengths for the same crime. While judges and juries may try to be as fair as they can‚ there are sometimes
Premium Law Judge Jury
Plato. The Last Days of Socrates. London: Penguin Books Ltd.‚ 1993 Imagine the time just after the death of Socrates. The people of Athens were filled with questions about the final judgment of this well-known‚ long-time citizen of Athens. Socrates was accused at the end of his life of impiety and corruption of youth. Rumors‚ prejudices‚ and questions flew about the town. Plato experienced this situation when Socrates‚ his teacher and friend‚ accepted the ruling of death from an Athenian
Premium Plato Socrates Athenian democracy
The Right to Trial by Jury is where the accused has the right to a public trial‚ lawyer‚ to know who the accusers are‚ what you are accused for‚ and a jury. The statement that has been said was that this Right should be changed by “Trial By Justices”. Trial By Justices means that cases are decided by the decisions of Judicial Officials. I don’t think that it is necessary to change this Amendment. All people being accused need the same amount of chance as the accusers do at the trial. People are
Premium Law United States Constitution Jury
Having a Jury Trial is known to be a part of the Adversarial System. Which is when exhibits‚ evidence‚ and witnesses are assembled by representatives of one side or the other to convince the fact finder that their side’s viewpoint is the truer one. Contrasted to that approach is the inquisitorial approach‚ used in mostly Europe. In this approach the Judge is given more control over the proceedings. The judge will interrogate the disputing parties and witnesses‚ referring frequently to a dossier
Premium
Reusi D. Ryals Writing 1 November 14‚ 2012 Socrates’ Stand on Democracy Having emphasized upon me the advantages of democracy‚ I have always believed that it is the best system to implement in a country. Ignoring the flaws and weaknesses of this type of system‚ I thought that the benefits outweigh all costs. I assume that giving the power to the people is better than having one person rule the state. However‚ in Plato’s account on the life of his mentor Socrates‚ we are able to see both sides of the spectrum:
Premium Plato Socrates
by Plato of Socrates’ trial‚ at 70 years of age Socrates was accused of impiety and corrupting the youth of Athens. Plato’s account consists of three speeches that were given by Socrates during this trial. Socrates speaks before the men of Athens‚ his jury‚ in 399 BCE and confesses he has forgotten who he was‚ he then recollects who he is‚ and finally he proclaims who Socrates is. The trial began with the prosecutors presenting their case against the accused before the Athenian jury. In this trial
Premium Plato Socrates Athens