"Soliven vs makasiar case digests" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 1 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    MAXIMO SOLIVEN vs. HON. RAMON MAKASIAR G.R. No. L-82585 LUIS BELTRAN vs. HON. RAMON MAKASIAR G.R. No. L-82827‚ G.R. No. L-83979 November 14‚ 1988 Facts: This is a petition for certiorari and prohibition to review the decision of the RTC of Manila. The facts are stated in the resolution of the Court regarding G.R Nos. 82585‚ 82827 and 83979; wherefore‚ the petitioner’s were lump together considering these cases were same in character. In these consolidated cases‚ 3 principal issues were raised:

    Premium United States Constitution Prima facie Freedom of speech

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soliven/Beltran V Makasiar

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages

    November 14‚ 1988 MAXIMO V. SOLIVEN‚ ANTONIO V. ROCES‚ FREDERICK K. AGCAOLI‚ and GODOFREDO L. MANZANAS‚ petitioners‚ vs. THE HON. RAMON P. MAKASIAR‚ Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court of Manila‚ Branch 35‚ UNDERSECRETARY SILVESTRE BELLO III‚ of the Department of Justice‚ LUIS C. VICTOR‚ THE CITY FISCAL OF MANILA and PRESIDENT CORAZON C. AQUINO‚ respondents. G.R. No. 82827 November 14‚ 1988 LUIS D. BELTRAN‚ petitioner‚ vs. THE HON. RAMON P. MAKASIAR‚ Presiding Judge of Branch 35

    Premium United States Constitution Court Judge

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Digest

    • 2264 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Constitutional Law Case Digest People vs. Perfecto Facts: Perfecto was convicted by the municipal trial court as editor of La Nacion for publishing libelous statement pursuant to Article 256 of Spanish Penal Code. Issue: whether article 256 of the Spanish Penal Code‚ punishing "Any person who‚ by . . . writing‚ shall defame‚ abuse‚ or insult any Minister of the Crown or other person in authority . . .‚" is still in force. Ruling: 1. Effect of the Philippine Libel Law‚ Act No. 277‚ on article

    Premium Ferdinand Marcos

    • 2264 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Digests

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    CASE DIGESTS: 1. ALCANTARA vs. ALCANTARA FACTS: On Dec. 8‚ 1982‚ petitioner Restituto Alcantara and respondent Rosita Alcantara‚ without securing the required marriage license‚ went to Manila City Hall for the purpose of marriage. They met a “fixer” and arranged everything for them. A Rev. Aquilino Navarro‚ a Minister of Gospel of the CDCC Chapel solemnized their wedding. The petitioner and respondent went through another marriage ceremony on March 16‚ 1983. The marriage was likewise celebrated

    Premium Marriage Wedding

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FLORES vs. COMELEC Case Digest FLORES vs. COMELEC 184 SCRA 484 Facts: Petitioner Roque Flores was declared by the board of canvassers as having the highest number of votes for kagawad on the March 1989 elections‚ in Barangay Poblacion‚ Tayum‚ Abra‚ and thus proclaimed punong barangay in accordance with Section 5 of R.A. 6679. However‚ his election was protested by private respondent Rapisora‚ who placed secondin the election with one vote less than the petitioner. The Municipal CircuitTrial

    Premium Court Appeal

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    case digest

    • 6534 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Calvo v. UCPB General Insurance Case Digest Calvo v. UCPB General Insurance  G.R. No. 148496 March 19‚ 2002 Facts: Petitioner Virgines Calvo‚ owner of Transorient Container Terminal Services‚ Inc. (TCTSI)‚ and a custom broker‚ entered into a contract with San Miguel Corporation (SMC) for the transfer of 114 reels of semi-chemical fluting paper and 124 reels of kraft liner board from the port area to the Tabacalera Compound‚ Ermita‚ Manila. The cargo was insured by respondent UCPB General Insurance

    Premium Insurance

    • 6534 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Digest

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    THE GREAT EASTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO.‚ plaintiff-appellant‚ vs. HONGKONG & SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION and PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK‚ defendants-appellees. Ponente: Justice Facts: * May 3‚ 1920: Great Eastern Life Ins. Co. (Eastern) drew its check for P2‚000 on the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) payable to the order of Lazaro Melicor.  * E. M. Maasim fraudulently obtained possession of the check‚ forged Melicor’s signature‚ as an endorser‚ and then personally

    Premium Bank Supreme Court of the United States Credit card

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aglipay vs. Ruiz [64 PHIL 201; G.R. NO. 45459; 13 MAR 1937] Case Digest I. Facts In May 1936‚ the Director of Posts announced in the dailies of Manila that he would order the issuance of postage stamps commemorating the celebration in the City of Manila of the 33rd International Eucharistic Congress‚ organized by the Roman Catholic Church. The petitioner‚ Mons. Gregorio Aglipay‚ Supreme Head of the Philippine Independent Church‚ in the fulfillment of what he considers to be a civic duty

    Premium Christianity Philippines Roman Catholic Church

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    case digest

    • 556 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aznar vs. Garcia Facts: Edward Christensen was born in new York but migrated to California where he resided for a period of 9 years. In 1913‚ he came to the Philippines where he became a domiciliary until his death. In his will‚ he instituted an acknowledged natural daughter‚. Maria lucy Christensen (legitimate)‚ as his only heir‚ but left a legacy sum of money in favor‚ of Helen Christensen Garcia (illigetimate). Counsel for Helen claims that under article 16‚ paragraph 2 of the civil code‚ California

    Premium Marriage Family law Law

    • 556 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Digests

    • 6972 Words
    • 28 Pages

    ASUNZA‚ Charles Darvin S. 4LM RESTATE THE FOLLOWING: 1. ARTICLE 279 No less than the Constitution recognizes and guarantees the labor’s right to security of tenure. Under the Labor Code of the Philippines‚ as amended‚ specifically‚ Article 279 of the said Code‚ the security of tenure has been construed to mean as that “the employer shall not terminate the services of an employee except for a just cause or when authorized” by the Code. The two facets of this legal provision are: (a) the

    Premium Employment

    • 6972 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
Previous
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50