NEGLIGENCE CASE Kathy Pagan vs. Dr. Rouchdi Rifai On June 4‚ 2009‚ 40 year old Kathy Pagan underwent an abdominoplasty and liposuction of the abdominal flap‚ at Dr. Rouchdi Rifai’s office in Jackson‚ MI. She experiences problems from the surgery right from the start. She had “dark-colored drainage‚ clots‚ and painful burning sensations and continued to report issues‚ according to her complaint‚ first filed in 2011.” She went to Dr. Rifai office where he cleaned the wound area without anesthesia
Premium Surgery Medicine Injury
Airbus vs. Boeing the case study Jimmy Jones University of Phoenix The case “Boeing vs. Airbus: Two Decades of Trade disputes” deals with the dispute that has existed between the US aircraft giant and the European Aircraft manufacturing giant. Boeing has 57‚000 workers in Seattle and an additional 100‚000 employees
Premium European Union Boeing
committees with the case Electromation‚ Inc. vs NLRB. With this act organizations must be careful with creating employee committees that could otherwise be deemed unlawful. They must avoid allowing any of the management team to direct or influence the work of the committee‚ as well as members of the committee are not allowed to give the impression that they represent the views of their fellow coworkers. Both of these examples took place in the Electromation‚ Inc. vx NLRB case and are now considered
Premium Employment Trade union Collective bargaining
In lecture we discovered that the precedent adopted in the State vs. Pendergrass case was Stare Decisis‚ which stands for “stand by what has been decided”. Stare Decisis‚ in further detail‚ means when determining the outcome of a court decision‚ judges look at similar cases dealt with in the past to help determine the outcome of the case presented. Another precedent that could be appropriate for this case is the maintenance of hierarchical relationships. Thinking that children need discipline is
Premium Education Teacher School
a good example is the case loving vs. Virginia (1967) which paved the foundation to the present day affirmative action plan. In 1958‚ despite
Premium United States Affirmative action Discrimination
mendez v. westminster and others http://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/background-mendez-v-westminster-re-enactment This article how the case got started. It started when Sylvia Mendez was rejected to enter a public school in california because it was for whites only‚ that got her father angry then he took action through school‚ civic‚ and legal channels. her father was represented by a civil rights attorney‚ took four Los Angeles-area school districts to
Premium
I. ROSALINDA DE PERIO SANTOS vs. EXECUTIVE SECRITARY CATALINO MACARAIG Republic of the Philippines - Supreme Court Manila‚ EN BANC G.R. No 94070 April 10‚ 1992 II. Specification of the Case FACTS. Santos was an ambassadress sent to Geneva for a mission. On her trip‚ she bought a discounted ticket which provided that she could bring someone with her so she brought with her adopted daughter. Some of her co-workers complained because they thought that Santos used government fund to finance her
Premium Legal terms President of the United States United States
CASE BRIEF 17.8 CASE CITATION: Gardner vs. Loomis Armored‚ Inc 913 P.2D (Wash. 1996) Court Rendering Final Decision: United States Supreme Court Identification of Parties and Procedural Details: Gardner is the Plaintiff and Loomis Armored Inc is the Defendant in the case Discussion of the Facts: Kevin Gardner was making a routine stop for cash along his route when he noticed a woman being harassed at gunpoint by another man. The company’s policy is to never leave your vehicle
Premium United States Police Law
In 1982‚ there was a case in the state of Texas called Plyler vs. Doe. This was a case that the supreme court overturned . The case was denying funding for education to children who were illegal immigrants and also denied the school district’s attempt to charge illegal immigrants a thousand dollar tuition fee for each student to repay for the lost state funding. The court found that where states limit the rights to people based on their status as aliens‚ this limitation must be examined. Some
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Many parents revolted and argued that the voluntary prayer was against their religious beliefs. One group of parents‚ lead by Steven Engel‚ took the case to court‚ claiming that the prayer violated the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment. Two major questions were argued in this court case. The first question
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution