si Basilan Estates‚ Inc vs CIR & CTA GR L-22492; Sept 5‚ 1967 Bengzon‚ J.P. Facts: 1. Basilan Estate‚ Inc. a Philippine corporation engaged in coconut industry filed in 1954 its income tax returns for 1953 and paid an income tax of P8‚028 2. On February 26‚ 1959‚ the Commissioner of Internal Revenue‚ assessed Basilan Estates‚ Inc a deficiency income tax of a. P3‚912 for 1953 and b. P86‚867.85 as 25% surtax on unreasonably accumulated profits as of 1953 pursuant to Section 25
Premium Depreciation Tax Taxation in the United States
diligence as testified to by its passengers. Inland and Philtranco filed cross-claims against each other. Both respondents moved to submit the case for decision without presenting further evidence. Considering that the documents are admitted‚ there is no necessity of any formal written offer of evidence and‚ therefore‚ after all the foregoing‚ the case shall be deemed submitted for decision upon simultaneous memoranda of the parties and upon submission of complete transcripts. Thereafter‚ the
Premium Appeal Law Jury
C.A. No. 299 March 18‚ 1946 FELIX ADAN‚ plaintiff-appellant‚ vs. AGAPITO CASILI and VICTORIA ADAN‚ defendants-appellees. OZAETA‚ J.: The plaintiff Felix Adan commenced this action in the Court of First Instance of Camarines Sur against his sister Victoria Adan and the latter’s husband‚ Agapito Casili‚ to secure the judicial partition of the estate left by their deceased mother‚ Simplicia Nepomuceno‚ alleged to consist of six parcels of land which are specifically described in
Premium Plaintiff Defendant Complaint
142-c. MENDOZA vs CA CECILIO MENDOZA vs THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS‚ and LUISA DE LA ROSA MENDOZA April 24‚ 1967 REYES‚ J.B.L.‚ J. Petition for Review of a decision of the CA SHORT VERSION: Luisa and Cecilio are married. Cecilio leaves her to work in the US. Luisa files a case for support. Cecilio files 1st motion to dismiss which is denied. Cecilio files answer with counterclaim challenging the validity of his marriage with Luisa. Cecilio files 2nd motion to dismiss on the ground of lack
Premium Pleading Marriage Appeal
US vs. FOWLER G.R. No. L-49631 J. Torres FACTS: This is an appeal to the Supreme Court by the appellant‚ the United States‚ to review the decision made by the Court of First Instance (CFI) of Manila. The two defendants and appellees‚ Fowler et al‚ have been accused of the theft of sixteen (16) bottles of champagne of the value of $20 on 12 August 1901 while on board the transport Lawton. Lawton was then navigating the high seas. The said champagne bottles are part of the cargo and are owned by Julian
Free United States Philippines Supreme Court of the United States
Case Digests in Administrative Law by Mark Anthony N. Manuel 2012 PEOPLE vs. VERA G.R. No. L-45685 November 16‚ 1937 FACTS: This case involves the constitutionality of the old probation law. Respondent Cu Unjieng was convicted by the trial court in Manila. He filed for reconsideration which was elevated to the SC and the SC remanded the appeal to the lower court for a new trial. While awaiting new trial‚ he appealed for probation under the provisions of Act No. 4221. Judge Tuason of the
Premium Separation of powers Legislature Law
Salita vs. Calleja 02 SCRA 787 Facts: This is a case for injunction filed by Pacienca Salita to prevent the sale by the Sheriff of manila of a house insatisfa ction of a judgment for a sum of money obtained by defendant-appelle Eduardo Calleja in another case against Fancisco Domingo‚ admittedly the original owner of the said house. Mercedes Domingo purchased the land from Realty Investment Incorporated. She‚ and her husband‚ then constructed a house on the purchased lot. The vendee failed
Free Property United States Real estate
Alalayan vs. NAPOCOR Alalayan and the Philippine Power and Development Company assails the power vested in NAPOCOR that "in any contract for the supply of electric power to a franchise holder‚" receiving at least 50% of its electric power and energy from it to require as a condition that such franchise holder "shall not realize a net profit of more than twelve percent annually of its investments plus two-month operating expenses." Also it could “renew all existing contracts with franchise holders
Premium Law Cagayan de Oro City Constitution
READER’S DIGEST CASE ANALYSIS By Bobby Renner March 6‚ 2013 Overview: This case analysis is about Readers Digest’s recent struggle to succeed in business. Reader’s digest was the number one consumer of magazines in the US and has struggle in the passed decade after the invention of Internet. They have recently hired a new CEO Mary Burner to help restructure RDA. Issues: * INTERNET- The internet is RDA’s biggest competitor. It offers information of all kinds free of charge to everyone
Premium Customer service Customer Balance sheet
informations were filed against the petitioner‚ one‚ for illegal possession of firearms before the Court of First Instance of Rizal and the other for violation of P.D. 33 before the City Court of Quezon City. Against the other accused‚ however‚ the cases filed were for violation of P.D. 885 as amended. Significantly‚ the petitioner was excluded from the charge under the Revised Anti-Subversion Law. During the pendency of this petition‚ it is significant that his arraignment and further proceedings
Premium Boumediene v. Bush Habeas corpus Human rights