The respondent then petitioned for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. This court then reversed the decision finding Johnson’s flag burning to be “symbolic speech” protected by the First Amendment. Certiorari was granted. The case went to the Supreme Court. Statement of Facts The respondent‚ Johnson‚ participated in a political demonstration outside the republican national convention in Dallas in 1984. Approximately100 protestors demonstrated against the Reagan Administration
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
Gregg v. Georgia My Legal Brief of the Case Facts: Gregg argues that capital punishment is cruel and unusual‚ so it violates his constitutional rights protected under the Eighth Amendment. In 1972 the U.S‚ Supreme Court ruled in Furman v. Georgia‚ that the death penalty couldn’t be used in an arbitrary manner‚ in any state. Issues: Gregg‚ who was sentenced to death‚ argues that society has evolved to a point‚ where capital punishment should no longer be viewed as an acceptable form of
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Capital punishment United States
Ethical Reasoning Essay By: Tajid Ferdous (500497376) Law 122 Anita John 500 words November 13‚ 2014 This essay will examine the ethical and legal aspects of the Eli/BIC v Wally case. In this Case there are two ways to look at this scenario‚ which is to look at it legally and ethically. In legal aspects Wally cannot be sued because he is covered by limited liability‚ which protects from losing more assets than he invested. In Ethical perspective BIC should be able to sue
Premium Ethics Philosophy Morality
"Nationalism is an infantile disease‚ the measles of mankind." [Albert Einstein] Nationalism‚ to a far extent‚ can eat away and setback mankind‚ like a disease. When asked should either nationalism or internationalism be promoted in society‚ the following questions must be answered: How does a nation handle conflict? Are peoples subjugated? What are the consequences of nations being overly dependant on others? The answers to these questions are the driving force behind the ideologies of Internationalism
Premium World War II Kosovo Nationalism
R. v. MacIsaac‚ 2015 ONCA 587 Facts The appellant‚ MacIssac‚ was charged with one count of aggravated assault that occurred in a collision during a recreational non-contact ice hockey game. The appeal was upheld in the Ontario Court of Appeal in a decision written by Hourigan J.A.‚ reasoning that the trial judge erred through impermissible speculation to reach their verdict. The appeal concerns a collision between the appellant‚ who played for the Tiger-Cats and the complainant‚ who played for
Premium Appeal Ice hockey Logic
however‚ the courts found it unnecessary to pass due to constitutionality of the Ordinance because there is another reason it should be dismissed. The legal elements required to determine criminal accountability must be examined to determine if this case was handled correctly. Facts: In October of 1970‚ the defendant‚ her boyfriend‚ and two other people drove near the area of St. Ignatius Retreat Home. The defendant was a passenger and to her understanding‚ they were headed for Christopher Morely
Premium United States Jury Appeal
CASE FOR ANALYSIS ~ SHOE CORPORATION OF ILLINOIS OVERVIEW: This case deals with a manufacturer of women’s shoes that purposely changes styles frequently to take advantage of the flexibility of a small organization. However‚ decision making in the organization follows such a convoluted pattern that conflict is a given. Work flow needs to be re-examined‚ and adjusted for efficiency. DISCUSSION QUESTIONS TO ASSIGN: 1. Analyze organizational structure. 2. What suggestions do you have for improvement
Premium Management
Tennessee v. Garner 471 U.S. 1 (1985 Tennessee v. Garner‚ 471 U.S. 1 (1985)‚ is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that‚ under the Fourth Amendment‚ when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect‚ he or she may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a threat of death or serious physical injury to others. It was found that use of deadly force to prevent escape is an unreasonable
Premium
Philips versus Matsushita: A New Century‚ a New Round Overview of the Case: N.V. Philips (Netherlands) and Matsushita Electronic (Japan) had followed very different strategies and emerged with very new and different organizational capabilities. Philips built its success on a worldwide portfolio of responsive national organizations while Matsushita based its global competitiveness on its centralized‚ highly efficient operations in Japan. During 1990s‚ both company faced major challenge to their
Premium Global Competitiveness Report Management Sony
Court of Appeals of Georgia KELLEY v. COOPER. No. A13A0982. -- November 22‚ 2013 Following a bench trial‚ the trial court awarded Melissa Cooper damages on her claims of breach of promise to marry‚ fraud‚ and attorney fees. Without having moved for a directed verdict in the trial court‚ which limits his possible recourse to a new trial‚ Christopher Ned Kelley raises five enumerations of error‚ including that a promise to marry is not enforceable when the parties are in a meretricious relationship
Premium Appeal Court Law