unethical atmosphere encouraged Enron’s CFO Andrew Fastow to develop some businesses that existed only on paper which he referred to as Raptors but whose technical term is Special Purpose Entities or the SPEs that received so much notoriety in the press (Zulauf & Grierson‚ 2011). Since these SPEs were essentially off-the-book businesses‚ it was easy for Fastow to keep hiding Enron’s business losses in these shadow companies. This strategy allowed Enron to keep reporting revenues with little to no
Premium Enron Andrew Fastow
The Enron and World Com Scandals Enron 1. The board directors failed their fiduciary obligation to protect their shareholders‚ employees‚ and business partners by allowing high risk accounting‚ inappropriate conflict of interest‚ expenses undisclosed off the books activity‚ excessive compensation‚ and lack of independence between the company‚ and board members. I feel the segment that got Enron into trouble was the Executive and finance committee (Brooks). 3. I do believe that they
Premium Board of directors Enron Fiduciary
Lithium Ion Rechargeable Batteries Edited by Kazunori Ozawa Related Titles Mitsos‚ A. / Barton‚ P. I. (eds.) Microfabricated Power Generation Devices Design and Technology 2009 ISBN: 978-3-527-32081-3 Liu‚ Hansan / Zhang‚ Jiujun (eds.) Electrocatalysis of Direct Methanol Fuel Cells From Fundamentals to Applications 2010 ISBN: 978-0-471-68958-4 Sundmacher‚ K.‚ Kienle‚ A.‚ Pesch‚ H. J.‚ Berndt‚ J. F.‚ Huppmann‚ G. (eds.) Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells Modeling‚ Analysis‚ Simulation
Premium Rechargeable battery Lithium Battery
There were several internal control issues with Arthur Andersen (AA) that contributed to the Enron disaster. Firstly‚ AA gave Enron nonaudit services as well as audit services‚ meaning that AA could advise the structuring of transactions for desired disclosure outcomes and other work and later give an audit opinion on these transactions. This resulted in a blatant conflict of interest issue that many audit professionals did not recognize. Secondly‚ the “tone at the top” of AA did not encourage ethics
Premium Audit Enron Auditing
any gas sales were made. There is no doubt that the projection of the long-term income is overly optimistic and inflated. SPE—Special Purpose Entity: Enron also used SPEs and structured financing to conceal their debts off the book and camouflage their existing debts. The officers manipulated the financial analysts to rate the company as ‘the strong buy’. With the SPEs and structured financing‚ Enron was successful to hide losses even when it ventured into other markets which were in reality
Premium Enron scandal Enron
"Charges at Bear Stearns Linked to Subprime Debacle" (June 19‚ 2008) . Healy‚ P.‚ and J Himmelstein‚ L.‚ and B. Elgin. "Tech ’s Kickback Culture." Business Week (February 10‚ 2003): 74-77. Huffington‚ A Kahn‚ J.‚ "OffBalance Sheet--and Out of Control; SPEs are Ripe for Abuse‚ but Few Went as Far as Enron ’s Fastow." Fortune(February 18‚ 2002). Levitt‚ A.‚ and P Lowenstein‚ R. Origins of the Crash: The Great Bubble and Its Undoing. New York: Penguin Press‚ 2004. Mahar‚ M Maremont‚ M. "Iyco Reveals $8
Premium Enron
The following month the company restated earnings for the previous five years and erased $600 million in profits.2 It turned out that the October report began to reveal Enron’s gross abuse of special-purpose entities (SPEs) and the mark-to-market accounting method. The company used SPEs to keep enormous amounts of losses off its books while inflating earnings from supply contracts by booking all profits from a contract in the quarter the deal was made.3 What also became clear was that Enron did not
Premium Enron Auditing Internal control
recorded as related third parties‚ these partnerships were never consolidated so that debt could be getting off its balance sheet and the company itself could boost and have not had to show the real numbers to stockholders. Andrew Fastow was using SPEs to conceal some $1 billion in Enron debt. Overall‚ according to Enron‚ Fastow made about $30 million from LJM by using these partnerships to get kickbacks which were disguised as gifts from family members who invested in them and enriching himself
Premium Enron
later‚ which might be a red flag for the external agencies. 1.3. Financing: Related parties to the entity 1.3.1. SPE: Special Purpose Entities‚ which are the source of funding as well as non-financing activities of Enron‚ are organized as partnerships. Enron utilize the SPE under the 3% rule5 to give rooms to transfer loss to SPE and spin off part of the corporate debt to those SPEs‚ which had to use Enron’s stocks as collaterals to the creditors of the company‚ thus possessing huge
Premium Enron Audit Enron scandal
Corporate Governance Issue [Writer’s Name] [Institute’s Name] [Date] Corporate Governance Issue Introduction The Purpose of the Case study is to assess the case of Enron mainly at the Corporate Governance problems. This Report will point out that why Independence of the Company’s Director is vital to clear operation of the organization; why successful Boards are compulsory for the companies to avoid the disasters like the Enron; and there must be the Working committee including the Non-Executive
Premium Enron Enron scandal