Erik Irre Modern Philosophy December 16‚ 1999 Paper 1‚ Section 2 If these great thinkers (Descartes‚ Spinoza‚ and Leibniz) were to discuss instead the soul’s connection to the body‚ what might each say (both on his own behalf and in response to the other)? Would they find any places where they might agree? If not‚ why not? (These are‚ after all‚ smart guys!) Though this sort of meeting would strike me as a debate with as furiously disparate and uncompromising ideals as one would find
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Philosophy
Term Paper‚ Philosophy 1107 Aaron Davis Evaluation & Comparison Between Descartes and Spinoza About The Paper: What I will do in this following paper is to discuss two very interesting philosophers‚ Rene Descartes and Benedictus de Spinoza. I will discuss each philosopher’s perspectives and insights on their most recognized theories and thoughts. I will then evaluate them and then give my opinion on the given topic. By doing this‚ I will contrast the similarities and
Premium God Metaphysics Atheism
Substance Esha Jain Descartes and Spinoza are both regarded as rationalists‚ and for good reason. There is quite a bit of similarity in the methodology used by both modern philosophers as they try to make sense of the world and establish what is true. Both philosophers have implemented an orderly way to construct their arguments as a way to seek the perfect‚ whole truth. One essential truth that both Descartes and Spinoza strive to understand is on the matter of substance. Descartes implores the possibility
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Mind
Abstract and Referential Ontology: Descartes Versus Spinoza on the Existence of God. The concept of God is central to the development of Cartesian and Spinozan philosophy. Although both philosophers employ an ontological argument for the existence and necessity of God the specific nature of God differs greatly with each account. While Descartes suggests a Judeo-Christian concept of God‚ Spinoza argues a more monistic deity similar to that of the Hindu tradition. The most significant difference
Premium Existence Ontology God
Rationalism is the principle that maintains that through reason alone we can gain at least some positive knowledge of the world. The three major rationalists‚ Rene Descartes‚ Baruch Spinoza and Gottfried Welhelm Leibniz‚ used this idea in order to defy skepticism and expose the true nature of reality. However‚ each philosopher is frequently in disagreement. The idea for ‘God’‚ and what constitutes substance‚ matter and reality are the four key structural beliefs that aid each rationalist in the forming
Premium René Descartes Ontology Metaphysics
with‚ Descartes‚ divided the world into two kinds of substances. He divided it by the “res cogitas” and “res extensa‚” which translates into “thinking substance‚ or mind and soul” and “extended substance‚ or body.” Afterwards‚ Descartes further divides substance into two more sections‚ “infinite thinking substance and finite thinking substance.” Descartes does not divide extended substance in two more sections as he claims that all extended substances are finite extended substances. As Descartes continues
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Existence
“I think therefore I am-Descartes;” “All noble things are as difficult as they are rare- Spinoza.” Decorates and Spinoza are unique; they are like nothing this class has studied previous. They focus on nature‚ existence and power as the fundamental building blocks to their unique philosophies. The beauty of these two men’s philosophies is not only in their contrasts but in all the ideas the students can draw from their logically thinking strategies; ultimately creating an individual philosophy and
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Thought
“Introduction to the Critical Study of Biblical Literature” Critical Reading Exercise #1 Reading Spinoza on Studying the Bible Instructions: The following questions are designed to help you discover some of the most important points in your reading selection. The questions follow the basic course of the article excerpts. 1) At whom‚ what category of persons‚ is Spinoza “mad?” Spinoza is "mad" at those people in organized religions whose only aim is obdience and to "compel others to
Premium Epistemology Scientific method Science
21‚ 2013 Baruch Spinoza “I call him free who is led solely by reason.” Part 1 Baruch Spinoza was born in Amsterdam‚ while the exact day is unknown‚ we know he was born sometime in 1632. He attended Talmud Torah School‚ where he was taught the fundamentals of how to be considered an upright Jewish man. His family were Marranos (forced converts to Christianity) who fled their original country of Portugal to escape the inquisition. (Honderich 545) His mother‚ Hannah Spinoza died when Baruch
Premium Philosophy Rationalism Metaphysics
well as seven axioms at the very beginning of his work. These definitions and axioms are set up in a way in which Spinoza can formulate arguments for the proof of the propositions he later presents. One of the definitions I found surprising was the fourth one‚ which states “By attribute I mean that which the intellect perceives of substance as constituting its essence.” (pg. 31 Spinoza)‚which is found in the beginning of Spinoza’s ethics. Based off his definition it can be found that it is not completely
Premium Definition Philosophy of language Logic