The act of no-platforming creates controversy of whether it is a legitimate form of activism to suppress the expression of ideas or an infringement on the freedom of speech. It can be used when a group with no vocal input feels discontent towards a belief. No-platforming can lead to consequences such as a suppression of an idea because a group of people found offense in the views. No-platforming should be used with caution as it can both‚ prevent harmful ideas from spreading‚ or suppressing the freedom
Premium Freedom of speech Critical thinking Logic
An Argument Against Monarchy Monarchy as a governmental system clearly has numerous downfalls for the majority of people. The working class (bourgeoisie) rarely wins. It puts people into a hierarchical system based not on the merit of their character and work ethic but instead from the family they were born into. Those born into the few available positions of power in a monarchy benefit the most. This system can function and create civilizations that exude power and wealth but at a price
Premium Democracy Political philosophy Monarchy
(STR). In this essay‚ I will first articulate more specifically the thesis of presentism and show the main arguments of the opposite position known as eternalism. I will then outline the special theory and its consequences for the metaphysics of presentism. I will consider some of the problems that presentism faces in the relativistic context by considering Putnam’s “man on the street” argument. From there I will address some of the solutions to these problems proposed by presentists. Ultimately I
Premium Special relativity Frame of reference
Argumentative Essay Against Kaplan’s Statement that Global Environmental and Social Factors are the Top National Security Concern of the 21st Century CYBERATTACKS – THE TOP SECURITY THREAT IN THE 21ST CENTURY Robert Kaplan makes a compelling argument in his book‚ “The Coming Anarchy‚” that global environmental and social factors such as resource depletion‚ overpopulation‚ crime‚ and tribalism are the most pressing national security issues in the 21st century. He cites numerous examples of crime
Premium United States Security Sociology
The determinists and fatalists also have plausible arguments against free will. One argument against free will‚ although not deterministic or fatalistic‚ states that God contradicts free will of all living beings including itself. If God is omniscient‚ meaning it knows all‚ it should already know all of its future actions along
Premium Free will Determinism Causality
counterparts. This also suggests that caucus goers are a large part of the voice and activists who are willing to go above and beyond within a political party. There are many criticisms against caucuses and some would go as far to say that caucuses should be gotten rid of all together. One of the biggest arguments against caucuses is that in the general presidential election‚ these methods are not used. Why be inconsistent with our methodology (Hersh‚ 2011‚ p. 690)?
Premium Election President of the United States Elections
between mind and the body. The argument against this theory is that mind is private and only the person of his own mind has access to it. Others can only observe behavior and take a guess about the content of the mind. Weakness of dualism lays in the lack of rational understanding about interaction between brain and mind. One can explain the interaction between mind and brain if they believe in supernatural dimensions that are responsible for that. Another argument is based upon what happens when
Premium Mind Ontology Philosophy of mind
There are many different topics and subjects that can go as far back as our first ancestors that people argued against one another. Each person wanting to prove the other wrong. Some of the questions have been answered today like the sun is in fact the center of the solar system and everything revolves around it. Before‚ many people believed earth was the center of the universe and would kill others that didn’t go along and agree. There are some subjects that have not been answered however. Everyone
Premium Universe Earth Science
even been some who torture others merely for personal pleasure. Yet now‚ as we enter the 21st century‚ we somehow have the same attitudes towards torture as our ancestors thousands of years ago. Have we learned nothing from centuries of this barbaric act? Surely our modern minds can come to a conclusive perspective on torture. Proponents of torture argue that it could be necessary to save lives‚ yet critics respond that it is
Premium Torture Human rights Suffering
Who decides who is perfect‚ normal‚ and genetically acceptable? The argument of for Eugenics is a widely debated topic that has been going on since as early as 4th Century B.C.‚ when Plato suggested a state-run program to control mating in order to strengthen what Plato considered as the Guardian Class (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy‚ 2014). Historically‚ Eugenics has been at the root of several movements to ensure a better human race‚ throughout a wide variety of cultures. How Eugenics is
Premium Eugenics Charles Darwin Race