it would be unjust and unequitable to allow the enforcement of a written instrument which does not reflect or disclose the real meeting of the minds of the parties. 3 However‚ an action for reformation must be brought within the period prescribed by law‚ otherwise‚ it will be barred by the mere lapse of time. The issue in this case is whether or not the complaint for reformation filed by respondent Leyte Gulf Traders‚ Inc. has prescribed and in the negative‚ whether or not it is entitled to the remedy
Premium Contract Pleading
an era where the exercise of law of freedom were extremely restricted. In today’s English law‚ freedom of contract is one the foundation of contract law. The existence of freedom of contract requires three main considerations: the freedom to contract or not to contract‚ the freedom to choose with whom to contract‚ and the freedom to decide the terms of the contract. Thus parties are totally free to engage or not to engage in agreements. However‚ freedom of contract can fail to have the desired
Premium Contract
Assignement 1 contracts Sayres v. Wheatland Group‚ L.L.C.‚ 79 Va. Cir. 504 (Va. Cir. Ct. 2009) CASE SUMMARYPROCEDURAL POSTURE: Plaintiff filed suit against defendants alleging that the contract for the construction and sale of a home that was at issue in this case was void‚ invalid‚ and unenforceable. Plaintiff also alleged that he was entitled to rescission and cancellation of the same contract. Defendants filed a counterclaim for specific performance of the contract of sale. Plaintiff moved
Premium Contract
Law of Contract II Semester 2‚ 2011 Word Count: 1932 A party’s right to terminate a contract arises from a particular type of breach of contract by another party. The facts of the breach and the nature of the term breached in each case inform the party with whose contract has been terminated‚ as to whether it is lawful or not. Common law rights to terminate arise in one or more of the following three ways: * Any breach of a condition of the contract; * A serious breach of an intermediate
Premium Contract Common law
Joe claims that the contract is voidable. Discuss. Answer: The issues that arise in this case are: 1) Whether there is a relationship between Johnny and Victoria? 2) Whether Victoria used her dominant position to transfer all of Johnny’s property to her? 3) Whether Joe has the right to set aside/ rescind the contract? 4) Whether this presumption can be rebutted? Every person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject
Premium Family Mother Father
Mutual Mistakes in Contract Law 4-3 Mutual Mistakes in Contract Law Southern New Hampshire University Abstract In contractual law‚ a mutual mistake is: “Where a mistake of both parties at the time of contract was made as to a basic assumption on which the contract was made has a material effect on the agreed exchange of performances‚ the contract is voidable by the adversely affected party unless he bears the risk of the mistake under the rule stated in 154.” (Rasmusen‚ 1993) 4-3
Premium Contract Contract law Common law
subjective judgement since most competitive ’ can mean various things; thus it is a value judgement which the court cannot enforce or decide. Using the objective test of intention‚ I believe that a reasonable person would know that Jack did not intend to form contractual obligations with either parties. Thus‚ I conclude that Jack makes an invitation to treat to three parties: Bob‚ Ken and Andy. An invitation to treat is an expression of willingness to embark on negotiations with the other party to see
Premium Contract
081-AC1221-60 Company Law ASSIGNMENT ONE The case concerns the pre-incorporation contracts. Firstly‚ it is necessary to define the pre-incorporation contracts. They are the contacts which the promoter wants to enter the contract before a company is incorporated. Under Common law position‚ the company cannot gain contractual rights or incurs liabilities from a pre-incorporation contract. Also; the pre-incorporation contracts cannot bind the company. In this case‚ Bosco is the promoter who
Premium Contract Corporation Common law
Contract laws are governed by the common law and the Uniform Commercial Code. The difference is that common law usually governs transactions with real estate‚ services‚ intangible assets‚ insurance and employment while UCC governs contractual transactions of goods and tangible goods like a house. It’s very vital to understand their difference especially when dealing with contacts. ANALYSIS OF THE 3 CASES IN SUBMISSION 5-8 1. UCC laws will apply in Maria’s case‚ the laws states that a change to an
Premium
CONSIDERATION A. Legal Sufficiency 1. Adequacy 2. Unilateral Contracts 3. Bilateral Contracts 4. Illusory Promises a. Output and Requirement Contracts b. Exclusive Dealing Contracts c. Conditional Promises 5. Pre-existing Obligation a. Modification of a Pre-existing Contract b. Substituted Contracts c. Settlement of a Undisputed Debt d. Settlement of an Disputed Debt B. Bargained-For-Exchange 1. Past Consideration 2. Third Parties C. Contracts without Consideration 1. Promises to Perform Prior Unenforceable
Premium Contract Contract law Consideration