obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities‚ for example‚ Germans in WWII. (McLeod 2007) The first ethical dilemma with Milgram’s experiment is deception. The experimenter deceived the participants‚ who were made to believe that they were truly inflicting pain on the learners and were purposely put in a position of high stress. Some teachers even believed they had badly hurt‚ or even
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
Obedience to Authority and the obedience experiments that produced Stanley Milgram’s famous book have produced almost equal amounts of surprise‚ curiosity and criticism. The criticism of social psychologist John Darley and playwright Dannie Abse are each representative of the general criticism Milgram has received; Darley focuses on whether the study has any relevance to real world events (such as the Holocaust)‚ and Abse focuses on justification of the experiment‚ i.e. was the study worth doing in spite
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
Topic: Millikan Oil-Drop Experiment The Millikan Oil-Drop experiment was the first experiment to determine the charge of an electron. In 1909‚ Robert Millikan ultimately came up with a way to determine this charge through finding the minute electric charge on a droplet from an oil mist. Basically‚ Millikan started with an enclosed chamber that had two flat plates inside‚ one with a positive charge and one with a negative charge. The portion is split up by the positively charged plate so at the beginning
Premium Chemistry Electron Stanford prison experiment
addressed in the modern day. Although many of us would agree not to commit crimes‚ Milgram’s experiment proves that humans are easily manipulated. At the beginning of the 1930’s‚ Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Party exploited the widespread discontent in Germany to attract popular and political support. Though the Germans were
Premium Family Leadership High school
1. Was it ethical to do the prison study in the way that Zimbardo conducted it? Why or why not? Explain your position substantively. I don’t believe that Zimbardo prison experiment was unethical. I do believe that it was morally wrong what he put the volunteers through and the extent he took his study. He himself admitted that he too got wrapped up in his role. Though as it was made clear in class there is a difference between moral and ethical. As defined by Webster’s dictionary ethical is conforming
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Ethics
In August of 1971‚ a group of researchers‚ headed by Dr. Philip Zimbardo‚ at Stanford University‚ set out to learn just how prison affects a person psychologically. The results of this experiment were shocking‚ to say the least‚ and led that team of researchers‚ and many others‚ to question just how bad the prison systems of America really are. The results of this experiment were far more devastating and shocking than anyone involved had imagined. Those involved had forgotten they were playing
Premium
Compare and contrast one laboratory and one field experiment. A laboratory experiment is where research is done in a highly controlled environment‚ where the level of control is very important. It is also to examine the validity of the hypotheses. It is an investigation where one or more variables would be changed under these controlled circumstances so that research can be done on the affects of these alterations. A field experiment is a study conducted in a naturally-occurring environment. It
Premium Stanford prison experiment Experiment
Solomon Asch‚ a social psychologist had a hypothesis and he decided to test an experiment based on his hypothesis. Asch’s hypothesis theory was... Would people still conform to the group if the group opinion was clearly wrong? Well‚ to test his theory he chose a simple and objective task with an obvious answer. A group of people sat at a table and viewed a series of cards‚ on one side of each of the card was a standard line and on the other side were three comparison lines. Now‚ the individual’s
Premium Asch conformity experiments Conformity Solomon Asch
The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment conducted by everyday college students and led by professor Philip Zimbardo from Stanford University which aimed to see the psychological effects of imprisonment. The purpose of the experiment was to investigate social behavior and how people would adhere to social roles by stimulating a prison setting with guards and prisoners. Philip Zimbardo advertised the experiment for two weeks and more than 70 applicants were reviewed. Applicants were removed
Premium
The Milgram experiment‚ as it is now called‚ was considered a turning point in social psychology and the science of obedience. In a new study from Poland‚ a group of researchers wanted to see if the premise held up. That is‚ 50 years later‚ would people still respond to an authority figure in the same way as they did in Milgram’s original experiment? "Upon learning about Milgram’s experiments‚ a vast majority of people claim that ’I would never behave in such a manner‚’" study co-author Tomasz
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology