Evaluate Milgrams research into obedience. Stanley Milgram (1963) explains why 65% of the people did something they felt was morally wrong‚ that is they went into an agentic state and exhibited some aspects of denial in order to avoid moral strain. However‚ Milgram does not explain why 65% did not obey. In other words‚ it does not explain individual differences as the volunteers in Milgrams experiment seemed to resist the pressure and Milgram does not explain that. To continue‚ the experiment
Premium Ethics Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
subject had given the maximum 450-volt shock three times in succession. The experiment was inspired by the Holocaust - were the Germans in league with the Nazis‚ or where they simply following orders as they exterminated the Nazi’s victims? Milgram wanted to study whether people would obey an authority figure‚ or would their own morals make them stop the experiment? The result - 65% of people administered the maximum 450-volt shock. Only one refused to go above 300 volts. From source
Premium Person Nazi Germany Nazism
It was clear that the situation seemed to create the participants to act the way their behaviour did and it was nothing to do with individual personality. The experiment links into the Milgram experiment‚ in which ordinary people followed orders to give what they thought was electric shocks to people they could not see. Participants’ behaviour was slightly affected due to the fact that they were watched as opposed to a lurking variable (Hawthorne effect). This questions the reliability of the experiment
Premium Prison Penology Criminal justice
Is it fair to deceive humans in an unethical psychological experiment in order to receive new information? This is a question that I believe needs to be asked when one thinks of the Milgram experiment‚ a psychological study set up in the U.S in 1965. American psychologist Stanley Milgram held an experiment in order to see how severely ordinary human beings could knowingly cause harm to another human. This idea came about when he studied the holocaust in Germany in WWII‚ and then in the Nuremberg
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
Behavioral Study of Obedience by Milgram (1963) Background: Some type of authority is necessary when humans live together and obedience is currently a very relevant concept. Throughout World War II‚ millions of people were killed through gas chambers and death camps. Although there was a mastermind behind the plan‚ there needed to be a huge amount of people to carry out the deeds. Some think that this is an ingrained behavior that can override ethical values‚ sympathy‚ and morality. Obedience should
Premium Psychology World War II Milgram experiment
Stanley Milgram is a 20th century social psychologist who conducted research into social influence and persuasion. His experiments on obedience remain some of the most frequently cited and controversial in the history of the field. Brown‚ R. (1986)‚ “Social psychologist Stanley Milgram researched the effect of authority on obedience. He concluded people obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative--even when acting against their own better judgment and desires.” He argues that
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology
(Hysterically) You have no right to hold me here. Let me out!” (Milgram‚ 1965) You would hope that any decent human being would sympathise and realise that enough is enough. But Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiment found that an astonishing 26 out of 40 (Milgram‚ 1963) of your average‚ everyday American men would shock an innocent human being to the point of death even after hearing these pleads. In 1963‚ psychologist Stanley Milgram wanted to investigate why millions of innocent people were slaughtered
Premium Milgram experiment Psychology Stanford prison experiment
Milgram experiment Have you ever wondered how people could do some of the heinous crimes that you have heard about in the news or in history? Have you ever thought what would possess someone to do some of the awful thing like the things they did in the holocaust? Well you aren’t alone in that thinking. Stanley Milgram a famous psychologist thought about the same thing. He wanted to figure out if what the Nazi soldiers was true when they said that they only did those awful things to the Jews because
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
In the novel‚ Stanley thought that his luck couldn’t get any worse‚ day by day his luck was getting better. Through the influence of Zeros friendship‚ Stanley changes from insecure and unlucky to confident and lucky. At the rise of the novel‚ Stanley is insecure‚ and unlucky. Stanley is insecure in the starting point of the book “ Stanley weighed three times as much as the other boy… She was unaware of how much embarrassment she had caused.” (Sachar 7) This evidence shows that Stanley is known for
Premium Sociology Pizza Italian cuisine
Diana Shropshire Student ID: 23277643 Master of Business Administration - 12 Institutional Costs for the Academic Year 3/14/2015 - 5/28/2015 Financial Aid: (877)221-5800‚ Option 4 Business Office: 877-701-3800 Date: 6/20/2014 $0.00 Expenses based on your expected enrollment status for the academic year: Tuition and fees $0.00 Estimated Grant and Scholarship “GIFT” Aid $0.00 Based on the information you provided on your 2014-15 FAFSA you do not qualify for grants or scholarships
Premium Debt Loan