being arrested for driving under the influence of alcoholic beverages in violation of CVC 23152(a)(b)-DUI and CVC 23103(a)-Wreck less driving. LOCATION DESCRIPTION: This incident occurred on Hudson Avenue and Cordova Street. INVESTIGATION: On 02-29-17 at approximately 2119 hours‚ I responded to Hudson Avenue and Cordova Street to assist Corporal Ward #9222 on a traffic stop. Upon my arrival‚ I saw that Corporal Ward had contacted Suspect Giovanni Zapien‚ who was sitting in the driver’s seat
Premium Police Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
rule caused major controversy over why the rule even stands. The rule originated from the court case Weeks v. U.S. The Forth Amendment was virtually powerless until the early 1900s.
Premium Exclusionary rule Law Supreme Court of the United States
In recent years‚ we have seen more and more suicides related to cyber bullying then ever before. An example of this can be seen in the case of the United States v. Lori Drew. Lori was an older woman who pretended to be a teenaged boy and began to talk and soon after started an online relationship with a 14-year-old girl. The girl eventually began to fall for the fake 16-year-old boy that Lori Drew created
Premium Crime Internet Computer
Wilfredo Alvarez Piera Separation Between Church and State One of the earliest modern liberals was John Locke‚ who in 1690 published Two Treatises following the conclusion of a major‚ and Locke would think senseless‚ religious sectarian war between Catholics and Protestants. In his manuscript where he introduced the concept of natural law and argues that faith and government have no business mixing‚ Locke contends that government should remain small enough not to trample on people’s liberties while
Premium Christianity United States Religion
Legal Brief: Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders Facts: • Pennsylvania State Police hired Nancy Drew Suders as a police communications operator. • Suder’s supervisors were Sergeant Eric D. Easton‚ Patrol Corporal William D. Baker‚ and Corporal Eric B. Prendergast. • Suders was subject to sexual harassment from all three of her supervisors during the term of her employment. • Easton would mention the subject of people having sex with animals each time Suders entered the office. • Easton told
Premium Employment Termination of employment Supreme Court of the United States
Bravo Fernandez v. United States is a court case that deals with Double Jeopardy. Double Jeopardy can be defined as “the prosecution of a person twice for the same offense (dictionary.com). ” Bravo Fernandez v. United States was argued on October 4th‚ 2016‚ because of an incident that took place in May of 2005. Mr. Fernandez‚ whom is the president of a private security firm in Puerto Rico‚ and Hector Martinez-Maldonado who is a member of the Senate. Both traveled to Las Vegas to watch a boxing match
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Law
Supreme Court of the United States Supap KIRTSAENG‚ dba Bluechristine99‚ Petitioner v. JOHN WILEY & SONS‚ INC. No. 11–697. Argued Oct. 29‚ 2012. Decided March 19‚ 2013. The facts Student from Thailand by the name Supap Kirtsaeng who arrived in the United States in 1997 to attend Cornell University discovered that the same textbooks that he was buying inside the US were sold cheaper in his home country. Supap have decided to start a side business by reselling foreign edition text books
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Appeal
INDEX CONTENTS Page No. Introduction 1 Issues Raised 1 Rules Applicable 5 Analysis 8 Conclusion 10 Bibliography 11 N. Nageshwar Rao & Co. v. State of A.P 1994 (6) SCC 205 Introduction India is a Union of States and is governed by a written constitution. Rights being immunities denote that there is a guarantee that certain things cannot or ought not to be done to a person against his will. According to this concept‚ human beings‚ by virtue of their humanity‚ ought to
Premium Constitution of India Law Government of India
William Rankin CP Government 7th Period 24 September‚ 2014 Dennis VS. The United States The case Dennis VS. The United States is a case that has largely to do with First Amendment rights. In this case‚ one side argues that the American Government should not be allowed to infringe upon an individual’s rights and the other side argues that the government should be allowed the power to limit rights dealing with freedom of speech in order to ensure national security. The findings in this case allow
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
I feel as it was written clearly and precisely. Your message about living as we should was explicitly conveyed‚ yet it held so much significance concerning the way humans live versus the life of a weasel. After reading David Searcy’s essay‚ “The Hudson River School” I found correlation between the way Searcy lives his life and
Premium Thought Personal life Mind