University of Phoenix Material BUGusa‚ Inc.‚ Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa‚ Inc.‚ link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME‚ Inc.‚ Advertisement Altrese Has WIRETIME‚ Inc.‚ committed any torts? If so‚ explain. WIRETIME‚ Inc. (WIRETIME) has committed trade libel. WIRETIME’s advertisement satisfies the three conditions of trade libel as defined by our text (Melvin‚ 2011‚ p.212): 1. Clear and specific reference to
Free Product liability Tort Strict liability
the laws under product liability. Product liability entails that “the liability of manufacturers‚ sellers‚ and others for the injuries caused by defective products (119).” Zoom Car Company showed negligence by not properly assembling the item‚ testing the product‚ and product design. Which makes both companies at risk for strict liability under the doctrine of strict liability in tort‚ Zoom Car Company and Corrigan Rulers‚ responsible for the negligence in a product liability lawsuit. “A seller can
Premium Product liability Strict liability Tort
it is irrelevant whether Jim knew the liquid was vodka because driving while intoxicated is a strict liability offense. Jim’s attorney contends that if the statute‚ which imposes a severe punishment without proving any mens rea on the defendant’s part‚ is a strict –liability statute‚ it would be unconstitutional. ISSUE The issue in this case is whether Michigan Vehicle Code MCL 257.625 is a strict liability statute? RULE MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE (EXCERPT)‚ Act 300 of 1949‚ MCL 257.625(1) - (1) A person
Premium Criminal law
absolute (strict) liability holds a tortfeasor responsible for his or her behavior regardless of fault. Some people feel that it is unfair to hold a defendant accountable especially if he or she did not behave intentionally. “That is why absolute liability is restricted in certain types of activities‚ such as abnormally dangerous task and defectively dangerous products‚ where the risk involved substantially outweighs the benefits” (Okrent‚ 2009). Product liability is any form of liability arising out
Premium Tort Tort law Injury
criminal liability. Corporate criminal liability in law determines to what extent a corporation‚ basically a fictitious entity‚ can be held liable for acts and omissions of actual people that the corporation employs. In 1909‚ the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a corporation “could be held criminally liable for the acts‚ omissions‚ or failures of an agent acting within the scope of his employment” (Carrasco & Dupee‚ 1999). Corporations themselves cannot do actions and so criminal liability falls to
Premium Criminal law Crime Corporation
EXAM OVER CHAPTER #20 1. I: The issue in this case is to identify what type of authority had the agent. R: Actual authority depends upon consent that the principal manifests to the agent. It may be either express or implied. In either case‚ such authority is binding and confers upon the agent both the power and the right to create or affect the principal’s legal relations with third persons. The express authority of an agent‚ found in the spoken or written words the principal communicates to
Premium Vicarious liability Tort law Employment
APPOINTMENT AND LIABILITIES OF THE “SHAREHOLDERS’ REPRESENTATIVE” UNDER TURKISH LEGAL SYSTEM | Many foreign companies are participated in Turkish companies through joint ventures‚ new company establishments or mergers and acquistions. Since the said foreign companies are located in abroad‚ they appoint one representative to deal with transactions of the company which they own shares. In order to appoint a person as a representative of a foreign company firstly‚ a Shareholders’ Resolution
Premium Corporation Limited liability company Limited liability
attaining the majority or knowledge of admission to the benefits of partnership firm. When the minor fails to give such notice within a period of six months‚ automatically he becomes a partner at the end of six months. The minors are having some liabilities after becoming a partner on attaining majority and he becomes personally liable for all the acts of the firm done since the date of his admission. Moreover‚ he can impliedly ratify the acts of the firm done during his minority. When it comes to
Premium Joint and several liability Acts of the Apostles Partnership
his/her employees. And after that I will focus on some of the reasons why one person is held liable in certain situations for the torts committed by another person. And then I will finally finish the essay with a conclusion at the end. Vicarious liability is where one person is held liable for the torts of another‚ even though that person did not commit the act itself. For an employer to be held liable for the tort of her/his employees‚ three conditions must be fulfilled. First‚ it should be a tort
Premium Employment Tort law Strict liability
Occupiers Liability for Dangerous Premises Occupiers’ liability is a field of tort law‚ codified in statute‚ which concerns the duty of care that those who occupy (through ownership or lease) real property owe to people who visit or trespass. It deals with liability that may arise from accidents caused by the defective or dangerous condition of the premises. By the expression “Premises” in the context of this topic is meant‚ not only‚ land and buildings but also vehicles‚ railway carriages‚ scaffolding
Premium Common law Tort law Tort