Republicans have been stereotyped as strict constructionists‚ while Federalists as lose interpreters. The true test of these assumptions is revealed throughout the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison‚ two leading figures of these two political parties. Although Jefferson advocated strict interpretation of the Constitution in his speech his actions proved otherwise‚ while Madison was at times a lose interpreter of the Constitution and in other situations a strict one. This is revealed throughout
Free Thomas Jefferson United States Democratic-Republican Party
Argument: Are corporations “persons”? Petitioners: The corporations in question here are not “person’s exercising religion.” Under the Religious freedom Restoration Act‚ Hobby Lobby and Mardel are not exempt from complying with a generally applicable law. These laws‚ in general‚ regulate the corporations‚ not the individual owners. The Green’s as “individuals” are allowed to make decisions for themselves based on RFRA‚ but any decision made for the entire corporation based on these rights cannot
Premium Health care Religion Health economics
the implied powers of the Constitution or that congress had the right to interpret the Constitution based on connotation. On the contrary‚ the Democratic-Republicans favored the protection of states’ rights and the strict containment of federal power. The Democratic-Republicans were strict constructionists and they believed only in the enumerated powers of the Constitution. Up until 1800‚ these descriptions of the two political parties were very accurate. However during the period of 1801-1817‚ the
Premium United States Constitution James Madison Supreme Court of the United States
Rational basis‚ is the law rational. Korematsu v. US case –during World War 2 racism‚ general said doesn’t trust them I was that classification acceptable and constitutional? Suspect classification Race has human tendency to divide racial lines Strict scrutiny – suspect classification. When courts sys ok federal govt treat ppl differently coz of race then scrutiny‚ legal test that measure of something crossed the line. ‘Compelling government o Interest’‚ why is the government doing it and is it
Premium Religion Brown v. Board of Education United States Constitution
Recognizing and Minimizing Tort & Regulatory Risk Plan The purpose of the Recognizing and Minimizing Tort and Regulatory Risk Plan to explain how regulatory risks and common torts describe specific measures on how an organization can manage and minimize each individual risk. The preventive‚ detective‚ and corrective measures for each are explained below. The situation in the Business Regulation Simulation is that Alumina Inc. was involved in some regulatory issues and Alumina Inc. social responsibility
Premium United States Environmental Protection Agency Tort Regulation
Critical Thinking on Logical Issues Scenario 1 There is a lot of tragedy surrounding WV Steel Company lately. National Construction (our of Colorado) is building a new football stadium. The opt to buy and use cables that were approved by a contractor for WV Steel. After the stadium is built the upper deck collapses and injures and kills civilians watching the game. National is now under a lot of pressure from lawsuits stemming from the incident. To make matters worse Jessica crashes her car on
Premium Strict liability Tort Vicarious liability
want without being in trouble? Kids in schools should not have strict dress codes‚ but instead they should just have some basic rules. For instance‚ girls should not have shorts that are shorter than 6 inches. Another rule would be that guys should not have sagging pants. Finally‚ neither gender should have shirts that show any skin above your waistline. In conclusion‚ Schools should have dress codes‚ but they shouldn’t have really strict dress codes. Dress codes should include basic rules that can
Premium Education High school Dress code
1. Introduction “Vicarious” means‚ “in place of another”. Although we are generally only liable for our own wrongful actions in certain circumstances a person who is not at fault can be held liable for the delict of another. This usually occurs in partnership‚ agency‚ motor car accidents and employment‚ these are instances where there is a special relationship between the person held accountable and the person who committed the delict which provides allows for the former to incur the liabilty.
Premium Tort law Vicarious liability Legal terms
Strict scrutiny is the highest order of scrutiny that the Court can give to any case. Only the most basic freedoms guaranteed by the constitution are subject to such rigorous scrutiny. Some of these rights include voting rights‚ privacy rights‚ free speech rights‚ and free press rights. For decades‚ the Court applied the strict scrutiny standard to direct burdens on religious free exercise. For example‚ the outlawing
Premium
the situations in the scenario 3 Task 2 (Outcome 3.2 & 4.1) 4 Explain the nature of liability in negligence and apply the elements of the tort of negligence and defences in situations above 4 2.1. Duty of care 4 2.2. Breach of Duty of care 5 2.3. Strict liability 6 2.4. Apply to scenario 6 Task 3 (Outcome 3.3 & 4.2) 8 Explain how a business can be vicariously liable and apply the elements of vicarious liability in the scenario above 8 3.1. Vicariously liability 8 3.2. Apply to scenario 9 Conclusion
Premium Strict liability Tort Tort law