Memorandum of Oral Pleading Parties: Mr de Jong (Claimant) and Mini-Coza (Defendant) Date and time: Thursday 4th October 2012‚ 10:00hrs Judge: Mr. de Vries The Group: Pasi Lindqvist‚ Daan Bredenbeek‚ Nick Bruurmijn and Redmer van Berkum Overview of the Facts and the Compensation Sought On the 1st of January 2011 the claimant Mr. de Jong purchased a buggie through a German provider Mini-Coza‚ who operated in the Netherlands for €275. The buggie was to be used by the claimant’s over-one-year-old
Premium Law Tort Damages
sellers‚ and others for the injuries caused by defective products (119).” Zoom Car Company showed negligence by not properly assembling the item‚ testing the product‚ and product design. Which makes both companies at risk for strict liability under the doctrine of strict liability in tort‚ Zoom Car Company and Corrigan Rulers‚ responsible for the negligence in a product liability lawsuit. “A seller can be found strictly liable even though he or she has exercised all possible care in the preparation
Premium Product liability Strict liability Tort
BHM443- Legal Aspects of Health Care: Module 4- Case Corporations‚ by legal charter‚ are not a single entity and do not have a central owner; however‚ this does not keep corporations from being liable for criminal actions or criminal liability. Corporate criminal liability in law determines to what extent a corporation‚ basically a fictitious entity‚ can be held liable for acts and omissions of actual people that the corporation employs. In 1909‚ the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a corporation
Premium Criminal law Crime Corporation
EXAM OVER CHAPTER #20 1. I: The issue in this case is to identify what type of authority had the agent. R: Actual authority depends upon consent that the principal manifests to the agent. It may be either express or implied. In either case‚ such authority is binding and confers upon the agent both the power and the right to create or affect the principal’s legal relations with third persons. The express authority of an agent‚ found in the spoken or written words the principal communicates to
Premium Vicarious liability Tort law Employment
A2 law: tort: Vicarious Liability Question 2-Fairness/Unfairness. Vicarious liability arises when one party is responsible for the tort of another. This situation occurs frequently when an employer is held responsible for the torts committed by an employee. An employer can only be held responsible for the torts of an employee‚ not for an independent contractor. There are also some rules that must be satisfied. First it must be proven that the tortfeaser is an employee. The act the tortfeaser
Premium Employment Tort law Strict liability
friend‚ Kate. While Cindy was swinging a five iron‚ the grip came loose and the club sailed through the air‚ striking Cindy’s golfing partner‚ Kate‚ in the forehead. According to the text; Torts and Personal Injury Law (Okrent‚ 2009); absolute (strict) liability holds a tortfeasor responsible for his or her behavior regardless of fault. Some people feel that it is unfair to hold a defendant accountable especially if he or she did not behave intentionally. “That is why absolute liability is restricted
Premium Tort Tort law Injury
Gun Control: Hand Guns Gun Control: Hand Guns “Strict gun control” is a set of legal restrictions meant to enforce scarcity of firearms among the citizenry (Stell‚ 2004). The imposition of gun restrictions are intended to control gun related incidents by making guns harder to possess. Primarily‚ the main objective of gun laws is to control the kinds of firearms that an individual can purchase. The laws authorizes’ the majority of people to buy and own firearms but at the same time
Premium Firearm Gun Gun politics in the United States
reflect on what they did and make changes to their behavior if possible. I also feel like the justice system should not discriminate and make other decisions to different cases‚ when cases are very much alike. Ever crime deserves time and in order to be strict‚ they have to also care about the individual’s and don’t just throw them away no matter what feelings are being felt towards these
Premium Murder Prison Crime
Immigration policies are an extremely controversial topic in the United States. It has been debated since even prior to the formation of the United States itself from the time of the colonies. Some believe there should be more strict immigration laws‚ while others advocate for less restrictions. I believe that there should be some immigration law reforms leaning towards the increase of legal immigration. Rather than getting rid of immigration completely‚ I consider stricter laws on illegal immigration
Premium Immigration to the United States World War II United States
submitted to prof. manjula batra | LAW OF TORTS PROJECT | VICARIOUS LIABILITY | | | SUBMITTED BY:VAIBHAV PRATAP SINGHFIRST SEMEMSTER‚ 2012BA.‚ LL.B. (HONS.) | | ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would take this opportunity to thank the people who helped me in making this project which has been a learning experience. In that endeavour‚ first and foremost I would express my gratitude toward my professor of Law of Torts Ms Manjula Batra. Her immense knowledge and teaching skills along with her helping disposition
Premium Tort law Tort Vicarious liability