Mill would say that torture is acceptable if it increases the happiness of a greater amount of people than if the torture were not carried out. For example‚ if one prisoner had information that could free 1000 people from certain death and if by obtaining this information it would be highly probable that you could save these people’s lives then I think he would say that torturing the prisoner is justified. I don’t think Kant’s morality has to do with intentions like kindness per se‚ but more to
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
Mills’ theory was that everyone should be happy. Not only should they be happy they should be equally happy‚ meaning no one should be no more or no less happy than anyone else. Mills’ parents believe that the only way to be happy is “self-happiness”. They believe that no one can make you as happy as you can. People can wine and dine with you‚ but if you are not happy internally‚ then anything anyone does for you will not make you as happy as you wish to be. I am in agreement with this theory. I
Premium Ethics Virtue Plato
principle is another.”(Mill‚ 1863) In other words‚ if we simply choose the action that provides the most happiness to people involved in a certain situation‚ and apply this mentality to whatever situation we are in‚ this will bring the most happiness. This doesn’t necessarily mean we have to give up our own happiness‚ because if everyone did this‚ none of us would be happy. Therefore‚ sacrificing our own happiness would only be good if it produced more happiness overall. Just as Mill‚ I do not believe
Premium
All throughout the media‚ one hears of murders and homicides. It is a crime to kill someone‚ but the government "murders" people all the time without thinking twice. There is a risk when pulling the trigger that this horrible fate will happen. If it is not right to kill someone‚ why does the government kill people all the time? <br> <br>In The Bible‚ there is a statement that says "Thou shalt not kill‚" and yet the government believes it can punish for what it already does. It is a crime within a
Premium Murder Law Capital punishment
John Stuart Mill: “Private Domain” John Stuart Mill’s explanation of “private domain” is a fairly simple concept. In Mill’s words‚ the basis of “private domain” is: “Over himself‚ over his own body and mind‚ the individual is sovereign.” Mill means that individuals should be able to express themselves in any manner without government interference. Society should not influence how a person carries himself‚ because the individual is the only person living that particular life. Mill feels strongly
Premium Liberty Political philosophy John Stuart Mill
Women”‚ and excerpt by John Stuart Mill‚ he uses these three rhetorical strategies to convey his views on feminism. Mill begins the chapter with‚ “The object of this essay is to explain...the grounds of an opinion which I have held… on social and political matters” (1). As he makes his position clear‚ slowly building the credibility of his writing‚ he begins to incorporate the rhetorical devices to get the attention of his readers. Mill uses the topic of women to
Premium Gender Feminism Woman
John Stuart Mill was a British philosopher and one of the most influential ones at his time. When looking at John Stuart Mill we see the economic‚ political‚ and moral theorist that he was‚ but what type of life did he lead to become the man he became? What education and influences did he have to become the “ideal Victorian man?” What characteristics define an ideal Victorian man? First off‚ let us start by looking at his childhood and life‚ his influences and what made him the way he was. From there
Premium John Stuart Mill Political philosophy Utilitarianism
Capital Punishment is the legal infliction of the death penalty. This is implemented if someone is found guilty of committing a capital offence. This is crime punishable by death. The main crimes that result in capital punishment are murder and treason. There is a difference between murder and manslaughter. Manslaughter is when someone kills another person but the murder is thought to be unintentional and the death penalty is not used for this. Murder is when the killing is intentional and pre-meditated
Premium Capital punishment Crime
Leann E. Dalton Professor Porcella PHI-160H-S01 November 22nd‚ 2017 Final Paper Outline: Aristotle vs. John Stuart Mill Approaches to Happiness Intro Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics and John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism establish different views on where an individual’s happiness comes from. Aristotle believes that happiness comes from virtue‚ while John Stuart Mill believes in the Greatest Happiness Principle‚ which states that pleasure and absence of pain are what make up someone’s happiness. Happiness
Premium
John Stuart Mill believed in an ethical theory known as utilitarianism. Kant and Mill both articulate thought that praise the use of reason as the ultimate good‚ that which leads to enlightenment and a general understanding and certainty‚ as Mill would put it. The two philosophers‚ while both striving to reach the same goal‚ ultimately achieve their goals in a different sense‚ and even demonstrate slight discrepancy in what they ultimately mean to attain. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill both
Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism