International but Safe and Sound. Internet Business Law Services. Retrieved February 20‚ 2008‚ from http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?s=latestnews&id=1658 Gray Tracy Leigh‚ (2002). Minimum Contacts in Cyberspace: The Classic Jurisdiction Analysis in a New Setting. JOURNAL OF HIGH TECHNOLOGY LAW. Retrieved February 20‚ 2008‚ from http://www.law.suffolk.edu/highlights/stuorgs/jhtl/docs/pdf/TGRAYV1N1N.pdf
Premium Law Data Protection Act 1998 Website
|Cases can be heard only in the federal courts. | |Exclusive Jurisdiction | | | |Share the power to hear a federal court or a state court. | |Concurrent Jurisdiction | |
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Judge Law
Sovereignty and jurisdiction are similar to a toothbrush and toothpaste. Just as a toothbrush is pointless without toothpaste‚ sovereignty is nothing without jurisdiction. One who claims to be sovereign must have jurisdiction to truly be sovereign‚ just as one who wants to use a toothbrush must have toothpaste. The toothpaste also needs the toothbrush to correctly function‚ sure one can argue that only toothpaste and a finger are needed to brush one’s teeth but by doing that you will never correctly
Premium United States
of R.A. No. 6679? Held: The dismissal of the appeal is justified‚ but on an entirely different and more significant ground‚ to wit‚ Article IX-C‚ Section 2(2) of the Constitution‚ providing that the COMELEC shall “Exercise exclusive original jurisdiction over all
Premium Court Appeal
equitable obligation therefore‚ it is argued that substantive fusion has not occurred. This strengthens the dualism argument and supports Ellesmere’s comment. However‚ as common law and equity are administered in one court it is argued that each jurisdiction has borrowed from the other but‚ this has not happened because the remedies do not cross over. However‚ it is argued that the different remedial responses of the common law and equity arose as ‘an accident of history.’ Furthermore‚ Lord Diplock
Premium Common law Law
235 Exam 1 Spring 2014 True/False Indicate whether the statement is true or false. ____ 1. Ethics is the branch of philosophy that focuses on what constitutes right and wrong behavior. ____ 2. Acting in good faith gives a business firm a better chance of defending its actions in court. ____ 3. Corporations can be perceived as owing ethical duties to groups other than their shareholders. ____ 4. Ethics is concerned with the fairness or justness of an action. ____ 5. Business ethics focuses on
Premium Ethics Business ethics
paper was prepared for Introduction to Justice Administration 100‚ Module 1 Homework Assignment taught by Walter Witham. PART I: SHORT RESPONSE 1. Jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear and decide cases. There are several types; a few are Appellate Jurisdiction‚ General Jurisdiction‚ Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Personal Jurisdiction. Appellate is a court that hears a case an appeal from a lower court. General is a court that hears various kinds of cases in general. Subject Matter
Free Appellate court Court Crime
INTERNATIONAL LAW OUTLINE I. THE TYPES AND SOURCES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Statute of the International Court of Justice: (Article 38) The Court‚ whose function is to decide in accordance with international law such disputes as are submitted to it‚ shall apply: (a) international conventions‚ whether general or particular‚ establishing rules expressly recognized by contesting states; (b) international custom‚ as evidence of a general practice accepted as law; Determining custom: The general
Premium United States Constitution Law United States
Marbury v. Madison (1803) Marbury v. Madison has been hailed as one of the most significant cases that the Supreme Court has ruled upon. In this paper‚ I will explain the origins and background in the case‚ discuss the major Constitutional issues it raised‚ and outline the major points of the courts decision. I will also explain the significance of this key decision. Origins and background of the case In the late 1700 ’s‚ John Adams was President. Adams was a member of the Federalist
Premium James Madison United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
judgments is the recognition and enforcement in one jurisdiction of judgments rendered in another ("foreign") jurisdiction. Foreign judgments may be recognized based on bilateral or multilateral treaties or understandings‚ or unilaterally without an express international agreement. The "recognition" of a foreign judgment occurs when the court of one country or jurisdiction accepts a judicial decision made by the courts of another country or jurisdiction‚ and issues a judgment in substantially identical
Premium Civil procedure Lawsuit Appeal