may be associated with treatment‚ and risk of no treatment at all" (Diaz‚ 2004‚ p. 181). The attainment of informed consent of minors can be very complicated due to the specific requirements‚ which often vary from state to state. Under US common law‚ parental or legal guardian consent generally is required for the medical treatment of minors. Medical personnel sometimes view the process of obtaining informed consent as an administrative burden and obstacle or impediment to providing quality medical
Premium Health care provider Health care Medicine
are three types of propriety rights which can exist at law; they are property rights‚ personal rights and equitable property rights. The first interest to consider is the lease given to Simon. To establish whether Richard will take subject to the interests one would need to consider whether the interest is capable of being legal. A lease has the potential of being created at law‚ as it is one of the two legal estates listed under s.1 (1) (b) Law of Property Act 1925‚ as a term of years absolute. The
Premium Law Property law Lease
Question 1 Explain in which way an agency may be terminated by operation of law. (3marks) Answer: An agency is created by express appointment when the principal appoints the agent by express agreement with agent. This express agreement may be an oral or written agreement between the principal and the agent. There are four factors can cause the termination by operation of law. i. Agency is terminated by frustration In Marshall v Glanvill‚ Glanvill who is a firm of drapers appoints
Premium Contract
Dustin Brown Student ID# 202011 BBA 3210‚ Business Law Research Project: Analyzing a Contract August 22‚ 2012 “Analyzing a Contract” Introduction I have identified a basic contract that is used when a provider and client have agreed to a specific service and payment for service (Savetz‚ 2012). The contract is at the end of this paper. In my scenario‚ the Client has requested the Provider to complete a concrete pad in the back yard of his new home. I will analyze this contract and identify
Premium Contract
ZIMBABWE INSTITUTE OF LEGAL STUDIES DIPLOMA IN APPLIED LAW Name: Laura Bandah Reg. Number: Z120117K Intake: August 2012‚ Semester 1 Course: Criminal Law and Statutory Offences Course Code: CLSO 104 Tutor’s Name: Ms L. Mhuru Question: (a) The Zimbabwean law does not normally impose liability or failure to act despite the fact that there may be compelling moral justifications for doing so. For example‚ the courts have often explained that there is no legal duty upon a stranger
Premium Law Common law
Introduction We are part of a non-profitable organization. With a team of 4 lawyer volunteering law advice and services to the community for free. In this case we are to provide Chalice with our advice on what are the chargers he can look into if he decided to take it to the court or alternatively settle by other resolution. Duty of care with Negligence “Negligence as an important element in law of tort requires more than mere lack of care”. A claimant who wishes to sue in negligence must show:
Premium Investment Tort Common law
Common law 1 Common law Common law‚ also known as case law or precedent‚ is law developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals rather than through legislative statutes or executive branch action. A "common law system" is a legal system that gives great precedential weight to common law‚[1] on the principle that it is unfair to treat similar facts differently on different occasions.[2] The body of precedent is called "common law" and it binds future decisions. In cases
Free Common law
from the High Court decision in Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd v The Dredge “Willemstad” (1976). Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd v The Dredge “Wilemstad” (1976) and Perre & Ors v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) has been important cases in the history of Tort Law. Negligence is a complex term including advertent and inadvertent acts and omissions where there has been a failure to take reasonable care to prevent loss‚ damage or injury to others whom they could reasonably have foreseen might have been injured
Premium Tort Common law Tort law
[Cite as Pusey v. Bator‚ 94 Ohio St.3d 275‚ 2002-Ohio-795.] PUSEY‚ EXR.‚ APPELLANT‚ v. BATOR ET AL.; GREIF BROTHERS CORPORATION‚ APPELLEE. [Cite as Pusey v. Bator (2002)‚ 94 Ohio St.3d 275.] Torts — Wrongful death — Employer hires independent contractor to provide armed security guards to protect property — Inherently dangerous work exception — If someone is injured by weapon as a result of a guard’s negligence‚ employer is vicariously liable even though guard responsible is an employee of the
Premium Security guard
CONTENTS OF PROJECT REPORT. 1. Introduction.. These were enshrined by the Constituent Assembly inthe Constitution of India Hinduism‚ it has rightly been said‚ is a mass of fluctuating faiths and opinions‚ embracing within itself a vast spectrum‚ ranging from the wandering fancies of savage superstition to the highest insight of daring thought. This brings us to a moot question‚ viz.‚ who is a “Hindu”? Under the codifying Acts‚ namely‚ the Hindu Marriage Act‚ 1956; the Hindu Succession Act‚
Premium Hinduism Marriage Hindu law