A left hook by Frazier knocks Ali down in the 15th round. Frazier wins by unanimous decision. Three months later‚ the Supreme Court rules in his favor‚ reversing the 1967 draft-evasion conviction. 1974 In January‚ he gains a measure of revenge from Frazier‚ besting the former champ in 12 rounds. Regains the heavyweight title in the "Rumble in the Jungle" on Oct. 30 in
Premium Muhammad Ali
In 1976‚ the California Supreme Court ruled that psychotherapists have a duty to warn and protect potential victims if their patients made threats or otherwise behaved as if they presented a serious danger of violence to another. This ruling happened because of the Tarasoff Case of 1969‚ in which the court determined the need for therapists to protect the public was more important than protecting patient-therapist confidentiality. (Vitelli 1) The Tarasoff Case is based on the 1969 murder of a University
Premium Marriage Love Emotion
Judgment is a dualistic approach to making a simple choice: we judge two in order to choose one. We judge one course of action to be right‚ and another to be wrong‚ in order to choose rightly. When judging two aggrieved adversaries‚ one person must be found guilty in order to vindicate the innocence of the other. You might think that the guilty are guilty‚ even before we judge them to be so; however‚ guilt does not exist prior to our judgment. Until then‚ there is a presumption of innocence because
Premium Logic Epistemology Truth
Criminal Law You have the right to remain silent‚ anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law. You have the right to an attorney‚ if you cannot afford an attorney one will be provided for you. These famous words came from Miranda vs. Arizona‚ a Supreme Court case that took place March 13‚ 1963 when Ernesto Miranda was arrested by the Phoenix Police Department‚ who failed to advise him of his rights to an attorney and his rights to remain silent. This case has given alleged
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Law Police
Judgment of Paris – Leonard Merrick Two actors from Paris‚ Robichon and Quinquart‚ fall in love with a woman‚ their co-star on stage. The trouble is‚ the lady loves both the men! Finally she devised a plan - she would marry the one whom the Parisians awarded the best actor title. How will they judge the two actors? Bit/Bits Robichon and Quinquart were two comedy actors in Paris and Suzanne was a beautiful actress in their troupe. The two actors loved Suzanne and Suzanne loves the two of them alike
Premium French Revolution Guillotine Capital punishment
scrutiny at home. In 1940‚ just before World War II‚ Congress passed the Smith Act‚ which contained the first peacetime sedition laws since 1798. Among other things the Smith Act made it a federal crime to "advocate‚ abet‚ advise‚ or teach" the overthrow or destruction of any government in the United States by force or violence‚ or to become a member of a group devoted to such. Not only was performing any of these acts illegal‚ conspiring to do so was also a crime as well. The Cold War was the most
Premium World War II Supreme Court of the United States Soviet Union
advantages and its disadvantages as a citizen of the United States. In this case‚ Supreme Court Judges had to make a decision over the whole controversial topic of freedom of religion. The opinion of the court was written by Justice Alito in which tells the scenario of what happened to Gregory Holt‚ which starts off with him as an inmate and having the religion as being a Muslim. But the Arkansas
Premium Supreme Court of the United States
IMPLEMENTATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPOMENT THROUGH PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE BY SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RESEARCH PROPOSAL SUBMITTED AS A PART OF CE IN LEGAL METHODS BY 12BBL015- Alind Chopra 12BBL016 – Aniket Desai UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF: DR. MADHURI PARIKH MS.REJITHA NAIR INSTITUTE OF LAW NIRMA UNIVERSITY AHMEDABAD 2012 Table of Content | Index No. | Particulars | Page No. | 1 | Acknowledgement | 3 | 2 | Proposed Title | 4 | 3 |
Premium Environmental law Sustainable development Sustainability
Summarize Morrissey v. Brewer In 1972‚ the Supreme Court came to an agreement that the number of due process rights are to a person who is constitutionally entitled and that is straight related to potential that can outcome the rights. Coming from a criminal case these cases have the biggest amount of loss potential that the total of liberty may be forfeited by creating the liberty interest. The liberty interest is a concept that requires due process procedures whenever any type of freedom is at
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States Law
against racism and inspiring the Civil Rights Movement. The three Supreme Court cases that influenced the Civil Rights movement‚ by supporting ideas of freedom; Dred Scott v. Sanford‚ Plessy v. Ferguson‚ Brown v. Board of Education. One case that had a major impact on the Civil Rights Movement was the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. In this case‚ "a slave named Dred Scott and his wife‚ Harriet‚ sued for their freedom in a St. Louis city court‚" (Dred Scott v. Ferguson). The final judgement made was not in
Premium Martin Luther King, Jr. United States African American