To: President of LJB Company‚ Thank you for selecting our firm to provide your company with an evaluation of your organizations internal control system. Internal control systems are vital in securing your organizations assets‚ it will limit the risk of fraud as well as misuse of your assets. Comprehending how to separate duties among your employees will aid in improving transparency as well as keep your company financially strong. Before the company decides to go public it is important to know
Premium Internal control
LBJ Company: Internal Control Evaluation Accounting 504: Managerial Use & Analysis Case Study 2 Written by: 8/10/13 This evaluation is being presented as an assessment of the preparedness of the LJB Company to go public at a future date. By researching current regulations regarding publicly traded firms we hope to prepare for a smooth transition into the trading market. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) has established the following guidelines
Premium Internal control Sarbanes–Oxley Act Security
Apollo 13." NASA - Home. N.p.‚ n.d. Web. 2 Dec. 2011. <http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/missions/apollo13.html> Apollo 13 Review Board Encyclopedia Astronautica. "1970.06.13 - Apollo 13 Review Board publishes result of investigation.."Encyclopedia Astronautica. N.p.‚ n.d. Web. 2 Dec. 2011. <http://www.astronautix.com/details/apo27567.htm> Greene‚ Nick Harris‚ Charles E.‚ and Michael S. Pritchard. Engineering ethics: concepts and cases. 4th ed. Belmont‚ CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning
Premium Apollo program Apollo 11 Apollo 13
Chapter 2 Assignment Ryan M. Kethcart INFOST-491 SEC-OL Exercises 1. Consider the statement: an individual threat agent‚ like a hacker‚ can be a factor in more than one threat category. If a hacker hacks into a network‚ copies a few files‚ defaces the Web page‚ and steals credit card numbers‚ how many different threat categories does this attack fall into? a. Overall‚ I believe this attack falls into four major threat categories: deliberate acts of trespass‚ compromises to intellectual
Premium Security Computer security Information security
References: McCann‚ JE 1991‚ ’Design principles for an innovating company ’‚ Executive (19389779)‚ 5‚ 2‚ pp. 76-93‚ Health Business Elite‚ EBSCOhost‚ viewed 11 September 2011. Mathewson‚ F‚ & Winter‚ R 1997‚ ’Tying as a Response to Demand Uncertainty ’‚ RAND Journal of Economics‚ 28‚ 3‚ pp. 566-583‚ EconLit with Full Text‚ EBSCOhost‚ viewed 11 September
Premium Marketing Soft drink
Case 2. Healthy Foods‚ Inc. Healthy Foods‚ Inc. situation is a tough one. Profits‚ along with morale‚ are down. They have just recently broken off from their parent company and gotten a new president. Some of the policies and business practices they have in place aren’t working for them anymore. Healthy Foods has a line-forcing policy‚ which requires that any store wanting to carry its brand name must be willing to carry most of the 65 items in the Healthy Foods line. This policy‚ along
Premium Marketing
Case Study 2 Springfield Express Instructions: Springfield Express is a luxury passenger carrier in Texas. All seats are first class‚ and the following data are available: Number of seats per passenger train car | 90 | Average load factor (percentage of seats filled) | 70% | Average full passenger fare | $160 | Average variable cost per passenger | $70 | Fixed operating cost per month | $3‚150‚000 | a. What is the break-even point in passengers and revenues per month? Break-even
Premium Management Marketing Strategic management
Arnold C. Collins‚ Jr Columbia Southern University Unit II Case Study Question 1 I don’t believe that the State of the USA designed to replace GDP as the primary measure of economic performance. I simply believe that the United States would like to see more indicators as to how our economy is doing and what we can do to help boost the economy. While taking in other information on what’s going on with the country. First standing us as a nonprofit agency I 2007 and would later gather more notice in
Premium United States Economics Unemployment
5716 | $31‚438.00 | ($104.50) | Guatemalan quetzals (GTQ) | 255‚000 | 0.1185 | $30‚217.50 | 0.1180 | $30‚090.00 | $127.50 | Mexican pesos (MXN) | 400‚000 | 0.0777 | $31‚080.00 | 0.0767 | $30‚680.00 | $400.00 | | | | | | | $423.00 | 2. Determine the foreign exchange gains and losses that Portofino would have recognized in net income in 2009 and 2010‚ and the overall foreign exchange gain or loss for each transaction. Determine for which transaction it would have been most important
Premium United States dollar Exchange rate Currency
Accounting 504 Case Study 2 Keller Graduate School of Management Prepared by: Samara Ellison Prepared for: Professor Hicks 3 April 2013 To: LJB Company President From: Samara Ellison‚ Accounting Firm Subject: Evaluation of LJB Company’s Internal Control Structures Date: 3 April 2013 Hello LJB Company President: First‚ I would like to thank you for hiring my accounting firm to evaluate LJB’s internal controls system. This report will inform you of any new internal control requirements
Premium Internal control