G.R. No. 118295 May 2‚ 1997 WIGBERTO E. TAÑADA and ANNA DOMINIQUE COSETENG‚ as members of the Philippine Senate and as taxpayers; GREGORIO ANDOLANA and JOKER ARROYO as members of the House of Representatives and as taxpayers; NICANOR P. PERLAS and HORACIO R. MORALES‚ both as taxpayers; CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION‚ NATIONAL ECONOMIC PROTECTIONISM ASSOCIATION‚ CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES‚ LIKAS-KAYANG KAUNLARAN FOUNDATION‚ INC.‚ PHILIPPINE RURAL RECONSTRUCTION MOVEMENT‚ DEMOKRATIKONG
Premium World Trade Organization International trade General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
CASE ANALYSIS – THE GAME PLAN INTRODUCTION This provides you with a guide for analysing cases. It will assist you to identify the material facts‚ the relevant legal issues and conclusions‚ and the possible ratio decidendi‚ of a case. When using this guide‚ please always remember that there is no one right answer to the question “what is the ratio decidendi of this case?”: Talk of finding the ratio decidendi of a case obscures the fact that the process of interpreting cases is not like a hunt
Premium Ratio decidendi Logic Rule of thumb
In this scenario the recent policy implemented by Anytown’s department of job and family services to remove the child from the home and placed into child state custody due to child endangerment in my opinion is one that should be enforced in every state “although violent crime rates declined in recent years for most age groups‚ victim data revel that young people face a much greater victimization risk than older persons. (Siegel‚ 5th edition) One major ethical issue that comes to mind is “what is
Premium Law Crime Childhood
City Council‚ 0 vote(s) against *Background of case: *the case began with a lawsuit from John Barron against Baltimore stating that it deprived him of his property which violates the Fifth Amendment. It proves that the government cannot take private property with just compensation. The court found that Baltimore deprived him of his private property and gave him $4‚500. It was later reversed but then appealed to the Supreme Court in 1833. *judges in the majority opinion: *they did not hear the arguments
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
“How are Native traditions and Taoism similar and how are they different? What common wisdom do these traditions bring to daily contemporary life that is relevant in our practice with clients?” Taoism is similar to native tradition through it’s’ emphasis on man-nature harmony. The concept of human kind co existing with nature‚ hence with the divine‚ is shaped by both Native American traditions and Taoism. Both philosophies have the same message: the binding unity of humankind with the earth; the
Premium Human Taoism Ritual
Facts: The Negro plaintiffs in these cases were denied admission schools attended by the white children under the laws requiring or permitting segregation according to race. All the court adhered to the “separate but equal” doctrine and held that the plaintiffs were not admitted to the white schools (except for the plaintiff in the Delaware case). In the instant cases‚ the plaintiffs contend that segregated public schools are not “equal” and they are deprived of the equal protection of the laws.
Premium Plessy v. Ferguson Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Brown v. Board of Education
CASE 14‚ PAGE 46 LGA INDUSTRIES: EMPLOYING UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS QUESTION: What factors appear to be affecting LGA Industries’ staffing practices? RESPONSE: The factors that appear to be affecting LGA Industries’ staffing practices are as follows: Limited workers available due to the company was located in a small town Most of the staff was immigrant workers and they did not have the appropriate documents to work. The employment application process was not handle properly The company did
Premium Law Employment Jury
Questions 1. Think about the elements of Graeter’s business that have stayed the same over its long history and those that have changed. Do you think the company’s owners have chosen the right factors to change over time? Why or why not? In my opinion the owners of Graeter’s business have chosen the right factors to change: productivity increase. Graeter’s is a constantly growing business. As Graeter continues to grow the more its productivity is forced to be increased. So choosing to change its
Premium Management Marketing Business
Pepsi Cola Products Philippines‚ Inc. (petitioner) v. Honorable Secretary of Labor (respondents) 1. Facts: a. June 1990: The Pepsi-Cola Employees Organization-UOEF (Union) filed a petition for certification election with the Med-Arbiter seeking to be the exclusive bargaining agent of supervisors of Pepsi-Cola Philippines‚ Inc. (PEPSI). i. Med-Arbiter granted this stating that PCEU-UOEF was an affiliate of Union de Obreros Estivadores de Filipinas (or the Federation) with two (2) rank and file
Premium Trade union Collective bargaining Employment
Case #4 Fighting Grime (Clorox Company) This is a fun case in that it involves branded products that students will recognize yet probably do not associate with Clorox. A good way to introduce the case could be to bring in product samples or show the brand names of their many products and ask students what they have in common? The case is short and vivid and can be assigned ahead or simply read in class. It is an easy case to grasp quickly yet provides some very clear examples of strategic
Premium Strategic management