Benefits: (1). Controlled quality By choosing option 3‚ Stryker Corporation can control the quality of PCB by itself. PCB manufactured in its own facility can meet Stryker’s quality requirement better than those from different contract manufacturers. Moreover‚ the quality can be more stable. Stryker would not suffer from the risk of contract manufacturers’ bankruptcy any longer. (2). Reduced cost and higher efficiency Stryker Corporation can relief its human resource from looking for new suppliers
Premium Depreciation Capital expenditure 1922
Case 1: Stryker Corporation: In-sourcing PCBs State the business case for option #3‚ the PCB In-sourcing proposal. What is the benefit? What is the risk? How do you compare this proposal to option #1 and #2? (2 points) Option #3 is the project for Stryker to manufacture its own PCBs in its own facility. Benefits: This option allows Stryker to control over the products’ quality and delivery in highest degree. The company can supervise every process of the production line to get every product
Premium Costs Cost Economics
Stryker Corporation Deciding whether to keep outsourcing or in-source PCBs Stryker Corporation has 3 different options regarding the supply of needed PCBs. Option 1: contemplates the fact of keeping the same suppliers but with significant changes in order to assure continuous supply of PCBs and quality. No investment is needed. Option 2: establishing a partner with a single supplier. This way there would be a sole supplier for Stryker established in a new facility near them‚ this would give
Premium Depreciation Investment Net present value
#3 suggests Stryker Corporation to build its own facility to manufacture its own PBCs. Under the current situation that some contract manufacturers have weak performance in quality and delivery‚ the benefits of this option are obvious as following: First of all‚ option #3 promised the highest degree of control over quality and delivery‚ which can solve the major problem that Stryker has faced with recently. On the other hand‚ self-manufacturing offers an opportunity for Stryker to carry out
Premium Depreciation Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Capital expenditure
DardenBusinessPublishing:210258 UVA-F-1341 This document is authorized for use only by shuang lin at UMD. Please do not copy or redistribute. Contact permissions@dardenbusinesspublishing.com for questions or additional permissions. MARKOV’S TRILEMMA George Markov eagerly awaited his first day at his new job with Athena Asset Management in a major metropolitan area in the northeastern United States. His future boss had given him a list of questions that would prepare him well for the
Premium Standard deviation Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient Microsoft Excel
Benefit: a. Better performance in management‚ quality and delivery. When PCB is in-souring facility‚ the management team of Stryker Corporation can directly control the production process‚ which is more efficient and could obtain better quality in products. Secondly‚ when the production of PCB is in-sourcing‚ it will be much easier for Stryker Corporation to make a delivery plan of PCB. This will considerably reduce the logistic losses. b. More flexible in outputs. Under current sourcing
Premium Costs Cost Free cash flow
Stryker Corporation: In-sourcing PCBs Table of contents: Executive summary 1. Introduction 2. Analysis of current position 3. Analysis of new project 3.1 Methodologies and processes of Valuation 3.2 processes of Valuation 4. Conclusion References Appendices A & B Executive summary: The executive for Stryker Corporation recently considered setting up own factory to produce Printed circuit boards (PCBs) – a key electronic component of many of Stryker instrument’s medical products
Premium Computer Personal computer Operating system
Stryker Corporation Case Study Justin Noakes Executive Summary In 2003‚ the Stryker Corporation is contemplating a change in their sourcing strategy for printed circuit boards (PCBs)‚ which are used in many of their instruments. Recently‚ Stryker’s suppliers of PCBs have become less reliable. They want to eliminate this problem by building a PCB production facility and produce the boards in house. In other words‚ they want to in-source the production of PCBs. This would give the company
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Cash flow
What are the primary strengths and weakness of the current system? How should the performance of such a system be evaluated? The capital budgeting system at Stryker Corporation made use of formalized CER forms by which individual divisions within Stryker documented the goals for revenue‚ operating profit and cash flow across in a way that were deliverable and consistent with global corporate targets. The CER system is a rigorous one requiring thorough documentation before the divisions obtain
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
COMPUTING NPV and IRR PCP Pj vs STATUS QUO STRYKER Case decrease in purchases from contract manufacturers less incremental Stryker manufacturing costs Operating income from project less architect and engineering fees pre-tax income less taxes at 36% After-tax income add back Building depreciation add back Equipment depreciation add back It & other equipment depreciation Subtotal plus NCW Savings Subtotal Cash Flow Terminal Value‚ at book value Hurdle rate Discount factor at 15% PV of Cash Flows Sum
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Investment Internal rate of return