H.J. McCloskey‚ in his article‚ “On Being an Atheist‚” presents a series of arguments to defend and justify his atheist beliefs. He debates arguments for God’s existence including the cosmological argument and the teleological argument; stating that these arguments are false and argues that without “proof‚” the idea of God should be rejected entirely. He is critical of the arguments for God’s existence and offers the problem of evil to be a major concern and reason why one should not believe in the
Premium God Religion Logic
In his book Nichomachean Ethics‚ Aristotle outlines a teleological framework as a way of understanding human activity. As a part of this framework‚ Aristotle suggests that there is an ‘ultimate end’ which is the goal of this human activity. For the purpose of this paper‚ I begin by reconstructing Aristotle’s teleological framework‚ and its relationship with the idea of an ‘ultimate end’. I will then go on to argue that while the framework offers one understanding of human activity‚ that it does not
Premium Plato Nicomachean Ethics Aristotle
of your actions and deontological is the actions that you perform. Teleological theories are what the consequence or outcome of what your actions do and Kant thinks that this is wrong and that we should act deontologically and act out of duty‚ not out of compassion. He believes that we should do something‚ because we have to‚ not out of compassion or if we think its morally wrong or right‚ we should just do it. Teleological theories are based on outcome. If you perform a bad act but the outcome
Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant Deontological ethics
someone. Adversely‚ teleological morality could claim that by not pushing the button‚ the witness is choosing to kill five people instead of one by not interjecting. From a teleological perspective‚ the witness should press the button as killing one person instead of five creates more happiness for more people. Morally‚ it would be acceptable to press the button as the goodness of the act outweighs the harmful effects. Morality can be classified as deontological or teleological. Nonetheless‚ morality
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy
1. Which of the fundamentals of planning did the McCloskeys effectively execute? Explain your answer. A.- McCloskey identified clearly their main barrier it had to be successful. It needed to change the perception about big farms. Pivoting around this issue‚ McCloskey developed a mission and vision‚ that described clearly this goal and them linked it with other fundamentals of planning. Their mission was described as “educating the public about modern farming‚ protect the environment‚ care for
Premium
The majority of the population‚ probably including yourself‚ claims they act "morally". Many of these people ask other people to act "morally"‚ but when you ask these "moral" people what morality is they stand there for a minute‚ and almost every single person will give you the wrong answer. So what is morality? In brief‚ morality is a basic set of principles that people follow. A perfect example would be Osama Bin Laden‚ a man that believes completely in what he does‚ and does it to his best. He
Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Ethics
Abstract There are similarities and differences in deontological and teleological ethical systems. Each of the ethical systems will be discussed in a compare and contrast so that they are made clear to what they mean. There are seven major ethical systems that are either deontological systems or they are teleological systems. Teleological and Deontological Ethical Systems When looking at two separate definitions
Premium Ethics Morality Virtue
Teleological Ethics = Consequentialist Ethics Morality of an act is based on the outcome or consequence of the act Deontological Ethics = Non - Consequentialist Ethics Morality of an act is based in the act itself. Types of Teleological Ethics 1. Utilitarianism – Utilitarian moral theory is classical utilitarianism‚ 2. Varieties of ancient Greek virtue ethics – Aristotle Ethics is an Example a. The goal of ethics is to explain how one achieves the good life for human beings. There are
Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant Deontological ethics
Assignment: Deontological vs. Teleological Ethical Deontological ethical systems are associated with judgments that are based on an action. If the action is considered to be in a good intent‚ even with the possibilities of having negative consequences‚ then it is still defined as being good. Branches of deontological ethical systems can extend out to ethical formalism‚ religion‚ and natural law. Ethical formalism is defined as the motive and intent of a person has based on what action the person
Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant Deontological ethics
something is the correct duty to follow. The Teleological ethical system is the opposite of the deontological system. The teleological ethical system judges the consequences of the act rather than the act itself. It believes that if the action results in what can be considered as a good consequence‚ than it must be good and that the end result will justify the reason that the act was committed in the first place (Pollock‚ 2004). Among the teleological ethical systems are utilitarianism‚ ethics of
Premium Ethics Morality Normative ethics