segments when calculating the WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital); Single Cost of Multiple Cost‚ Cost of Debt‚ Cost of Equity‚ and Weights of Capital. In Joanna’s estimate she chooses to use a single cost of capital. Her reasoning behind this decision lies in the risk associated with the different business segments of Nike. We agree with her assessment that a single cost of capital is most appropriate with Nike. It should also be noted that the major use of WACC is to assist in this estimation
Premium Weighted average cost of capital
15% preferred stock‚ and 35% debt. If the cost of common equity for the firm is 19.6%‚ the cost of preferred stock is 12.9% and the before tax cost of debt is 9.5% what is the weighted average cost of capital? The firm’s tax rate is 35%. Answer: WACC = (50% x 19.6%) + (15% x 12.9%) + ( 35% x 9.5% x 65% = Q2: The following are the information of a company: |Type of capital |Book value (Tk) |Market value (Tk) |Specific cost (%) | | |
Premium Stock Weighted average cost of capital
Corporation that weighted average cost of capital (WACC) have to be calculated for every division. To apply the formula of the WACC the costs of equity have to be known. The cost of equity can be determined through the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). The results for every division’s equity cost and the computation of the hurdle rates can be seen in the Appendix. The divisions with higher risk have higher weighted average cost of capital. WACC/Hurdle Rate Real Estate 9.19% Ceramic Coatings
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Finance Risk
shows the stock price movement of Infosys over the past one year.2 STOCK PRICE VALUATION Discounted Cash Flow Method (DCF) Method WACC Calculation WACC = (Cost of Equity) (E / E+D) + (Cost of Debt) (1 - Tax Rate) (D / E+D) Risk-free Rate (India) 3 month Treasury Bill Rate3 8.18% NOT USED for WACC 10 year Long Term Treasury Bond Rate4 8.23% USED for WACC The investor is expected to
Premium Discounted cash flow Free cash flow Stock market
fund for NorthPoint Group. Her company is trying to decide whether or not to invest in Nike’s stock‚ which has been declining in price in the past year. Kimi has asked her assistant‚ Joanna Cohen‚ to estimate Nike’s weight average cost of capital (WACC) to help make this decision (Case 13‚ pg. 58). We looked at Joanna’s estimates and discovered a few problems that she made when estimating her cost of capital. We found Joanna’s estimates to be wrong because of a few reasons. The first mistake she
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Investment Financial markets
NIKE‚ INC.: COST OF CAPITAL Book value vs. Market value While calculating the Nike’s cost of capital using both the book value (Exhibit 1.1) and the market value (Exhibit 1.2)‚ I could notice the mistake Cohen made finding the equity value. Cohen used the book value to reflect equity value. Although the book value is an accepted measure to estimate the debt value‚ the equity’s book value is an inaccurate measure of the value perceived by the shareholders. Since Nike is a publicly traded company
Premium Stock market Stock Interest
Royal Asset Package Valuation DCF Valuation EBITDA - Depreciation EBIT - Taxes on EBIT + Depreciation - Capex - WK FCF Wacc Enterprise Value + Terminal Value + working capital Total EV (31/12/1983) EV/EBITDA 1984 EV/EBITDA 1985 EV/EBITDA avg. Terminal Value Growth Capex = Depreciation Monticello Mill financials Revenues Annual Capacity Utilization rate Tons Price per ton EBITDA margin Box Plants financials Revenues EBTIDA margin Combined Package financials Revenues EBITDA margin Depreciation EBIT
Premium
levels between the years 2008-2012. Owing to the uneven capital structures between 2008 and 2012‚ it will be prudent not to deploy WACC to value the target but value the target using APV. Additionally‚ WACC computation might be difficult to use since an adjustment discount rate each year the capital structures change. Assuming that the project will de-lever after 2012‚ WACC valuation will be applied to determine the terminal value. factors the interest tax shields in its calculation and in the case
Premium Free cash flow Discounted cash flow Net present value
Abstract This paper is an analysis of Road King Trucks’ new project which is introducing a new product into its product line. I will decide whether run the project or not. Six issues will be discussed as follows 1) importance of energy cost; 2) project’s cash flows; 3) cost of capital; 4) choose an engine 5) evaluation 6) accept or reject. We should accept the project because of the positive NPV and high IRR. We will gain $532 million in wealth which is a big money on the scale like this. The
Premium Internal rate of return Net present value Public transport
Q.1: Joint Venture organization 1. From the bottler’s perspective A)Corporate governance • I would require the concentrate producer to purchase a minority share in the company that would ideally be 49% . This is because the more shares the producer buys‚ the more growth and profit margins I expect to have. This was seen with the Gallardo-PepsiCo joint venture expectations. Plus‚ I would like to name more directors than the producer. • As we have seen in the text‚ concentrate producers and bottlers
Premium Corporate finance Capital Generally Accepted Accounting Principles