1. Name and Citation R. v. Williams‚ [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128 2. Type and Level of Case This case was heard by the British Colombia Court of Appeal on February 24th‚ 1998 and a decision was made on June 4th‚ 1998. 3. Facts The accused‚ an aboriginal man‚ pleaded guilty to robbery charge‚ saying that the robbery was done by someone other than himself. He was elected a trail by judge and jury. First Trail; questions were asked to jury to assure the jury was unbiased‚ 12 of 43 potential jurors were dismissed
Premium Jury Court Appeal
Case: R v. Hebert Facts of Case Judges: Dickson‚ Robert George Brian; Lamer‚ Antonio; Wilson‚ Bertha; La Forest‚ Gérard V.; L’Heureux-Dubé‚ Claire; Sopinka‚ John; Gonthier‚ Charles Doherty; Cory‚ Peter deCarteret; McLachlin‚ Beverley Neil Hebert was suspected of having robbed the Klondike Inn. After the police located Hebert‚ they placed him under arrest and informed him of his rights‚ and took him to the R.C.M.P detachment in Whitehorse. Hebert contacted counsel and obtained legal advice regarding
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Police
R. v Burns case Brief Case Facts The defendants Glen Sebastian Burns and Atif Ahmad Rafay were accused to have committed aggravated first degree murder in Washington State. In a confession to an undercover RCMP officer in British Columbia‚ posing as a mob boss‚ it is clamed that Burns was a contract killer hired by Rafay to kill his parents so that Rafay could get insurance money for their deaths. It is claimed that Burns beat the victims with a baseball bat while Rafay watched (para.10). They
Premium Appeal Crime Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
THABO MELI v R Fact of the case : The defendants had taken their intended victim to a hut and plied him with drink so that he became intoxicated. They then hit the victim around the head‚ intending to kill him. In fact the defendants only succeeded in knocking him unconscious‚ but believing the victim to be dead‚ they threw his body over a cliff. The victim survived but died of exposure some time later. The defendants were convicted of murder‚ and appealed to the Privy Council on the ground that
Premium Causality Death Criminal law
trial R. V Latimer (1997) Robert was convicted for second degree murder although the Supreme
Premium English-language films Family American films
The Stephen J.R. Smith School of Business is Canada’s most prestigious undergraduate business program. Whilst attending Queen’s I would be able to further my leadership and inter-personal skills. Outside of the business aspect‚ I’m drawn to the extracurricular activities offered. I have a profound interest in community outreach programs as well as clubs that help the environment. Additionally‚ I would be able to continue swimming‚ painting‚ and playing the piano‚ which are a few of my passions. I
Premium Management Business Learning
Case Brief By: Ashley Tam R. v. Martineau (1991)‚ 58 C.C.C. (3d) 353 (S.C.C.) Facts: The appellant‚ Martineau‚ was convicted of second-degree murder under s. 213(a) and (d) of the Criminal Code but the decision was overturned by the Alberta Court of Appeal who concluded that s. 213(a) violated ss. 7 and 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and could no longer be in effect. The issue was brought before the Supreme Court of Canada whether or not the appeal court was correct in
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Abortion Canada
Case Brief: R v.Shankar Citation: Regina v. Corey Shankar‚ 2007 ONCA 280 (CanLII) Facts: The accused was driving his car without the required laminated taillights when officers pulled him over late October 2004. The police asked Shankar for his licence‚ registration‚ and insurance. The accused handed over a licence in the name of Jason Singh‚ the insurance information handwritten on an informal yellow sticky note‚ and a photocopy of the vehicle registration. When inquired about the spelling of
Premium Appeal English-language films Judgment
Management accounting advanced Timothy Alkemade 10195270 Theo Dekker 10004598 Ninh Pham 10281746 Lion Scholte 10002248 Marco van Zijp 10285040 Mobil USM&R (A) Case Analysis 1 What objectives and measures should the two customer teams ( consumer sub-team‚ dealer sub-team) select for their core customer outcomes. How can these teams measure what the dealer and Mobil must do well to achieve the desired customer outcomes? Customer Sub Team Objective
Premium Management Balanced scorecard Strategic management
I am Doug Wright‚ the attorney for Patricia R. Ellis. It has been brought to my attention that Hunter D. Ellis has been having some emotional complications that is precipitated by his father’s presence at his Basketball and Baseball games. Hunter has come from a dysfunctional home environment that was caused by his father’s behavior. His father’s paranoia never allowed Hunter to be himself‚ his father made Hunter feel resentful‚ inadequate‚ and powerless. Hunter has previously been picked on and
Premium English-language films Family Mother