In the Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller‚ the Court analyzed the meaning and extent of the Second Amendment for the first time since 1939. In narrow 5-4 decision penned by Justice that the District of Columbia’s ban on handgun was unconstitutional and thus violates the individual right granted by the Second Amendment. The Justices of the Supreme Court interpreted the Second Amendment as the right of individuals to keep and bear arms‚ having nothing to do with collective right grant
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States
Terrorism is growing threat that is being discussed all around the world. This is because the threat of terroristic violence is increasing at an extremely fast rate. For the United States‚ the threat of domestic and international terrorism weighs on the minds of the federal government and private citizens. The 2014 Quadrennial Homeland Security Review even went as far as to note that terrorism is one of the six strategic challenges that are likely to affect the United States throughout the next five
Premium Terrorism United States
Case: Near v. Minnesota 1931 U.S. Supreme Court Parties Jay Near (Plaintiff) State of Minnesota (Defendant) Facts: A publication‚ The Saturday Press‚ published an article alleging that City officials of Minneapolis were complaisant with gangsters who were engaged in illegal activities in the city. A Minnesota law was in effect which allowed the state courts to enjoin a publication which was engaged in a public nuisance. To be a nuisance the publisher had to be printing material that was malicious
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
order for a country to be truly democratic‚ all people must have these rights because the population consists of everyone‚ not just one race. One of the key moments in the oppression of the African American community was the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court
Premium Jim Crow laws Plessy v. Ferguson Racial segregation
Caucasian‚ sat in a "whites only" car of a Louisiana train‚ and refused to move to the car for blacks and was then arrested. The Court had to decide whether the Louisiana law was unconstitutional under the 14th amendment. The Court ruled that the state law was within its constitutional boundaries. The majority of this case supported the state-imposed racial segregation. The Court based their final decision on the separate but equal doctrine and agreed that the state had separate facilities for blacks and
Premium Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Plessy v. Ferguson Brown v. Board of Education
segregation and discrimination. Led by Chief Justice Earl Warren during the Civil Rights Movement‚ the Supreme Court embodied the idea of legal liberalism‚ using the law to achieve political ends. During this era‚ the Court used the civil rights cases brought to them to achieve social change and promote equality. The decision in Loving v. Virginia is one example illustrating the Supreme Court using its power to attain racial equality and change and reform the American society‚ as striking down anti-miscegenation
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
establish justice. The Declaration of Independence states that all men are created equal and they have the rights to Life‚ Liberty‚ and the Pursuit of Happiness. Warren McCleskey received the death penalty after he was convicted of murder and the Supreme Court reviewed the case to figure out the proper sentence for Mr. McCleskey.
Premium Capital punishment Crime Law
After the Supreme Court was established pursuant to Article Three of the United States Constitution in 1789‚ the extent to which the Supreme Court can affect social change has always been disputable. Scholars developed different definitions of social change and looked in different fields to discuss the Court’s effect. Expanding on their ideas‚ I argue that the Court is successful in generating attention from society to the cases it decides on‚ yet it takes time for changes in public opinion and implementing
Premium United States Constitution United States United States Congress
W Marbury v Madison 1803 will forever and always be a Supreme Court Case that will live infamously in today’s history. During the election of 1800 against incumbent president John Adams of the Federalist Party versus the Anti-Federalist Party nominee Thomas Jefferson‚ with Jefferson being the victor. Before Adams were to leave the presidential office‚ he made what is called “midnight appointments” of new judgeships to counter act the Jeffersonians once in office. John Marshall‚ who was secretary
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Woman and together worked on the Brown versus Board of Education case. (ACLU) In Brown versus Board of Education‚ a compilation of four actual cases‚ the Supreme Court declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional‚ which at the time of civil rights and lingering racism was‚ for some‚ a controversial idea. (US Courts) The 1973 Supreme Court cases Roe versus Wade and Doe versus Bolton involved the argument that women held the right to privacy and therefore could decide for themselves whether
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States