her BFA from the Atlanta College of art‚ and her MFA from Rhode Island School of Design. Her controversial art has been exhibited in many major institutions (artnet.com). When looking at Kara’s artistic work one piece stuck out to me and it is Testimony #3 2005(kennethafriedman.com). This piece shows a struggle between races the devilish man on the horse is what I believe to be a white man. It looks as though he has a gun pointing to the air and the man in front of the horse is what I believe to
Premium Slavery Art Slavery in the United States
Criminal court cases often require critical thinking and analyzing. From anything to petty theft and murder require specific amounts of justice or discipline so to speak. After reading the Case of Mary Burnett and analyzing the testimonies I believe the defendant should be found not guilty on charges of 2nd degree murder. After analyzing this case the hard facts have been derived. The defendant is Mary Burnett who is charged with leaving her child at home unattended while she went to California
Premium Critical thinking Guilt Great Depression
and Reconciliation we get to examine the results of the new government’s attempts at making reconciliations with some of the wrongs that the people of South Africa had endured during apartheid by means of “truth commissions” vis-à-vis people’s testimonies to the level of personal victimization they had endured. However‚ not all people chose to portray their involvement (however they want to define it) in apartheid as pure victimization. If one chose to recognize their involvement in apartheid in
Premium Abuse South Africa Human rights
Adjournment at Salem. The Accounts of the Salem Witchcraft Trials‚ highlights testimonies by the accusers and passages between Martin and the magistrate. Among many who testified against Martin there was‚ John Atkinson‚ Robert Downer‚ and Joseph Ring. During the trial there were various mishaps and abnormal behavior. It also states some of the abnormal actions of the effected individuals. Mather recorded the testimony of John Atkinson. Atkinson claims‚ he exchanged a cow with Martin’s son. He stated
Premium Salem witch trials
Anthony. The trial judge’s opinions and rulings will never be subjected to appellate review. The case is‚ however‚ illustrative from a forensic science evidence viewpoint. The Vass "human decomposition odor analysis" testimony would clearly not be admissible under Daubert criteria. There are no standards; there has been no testing of his theory‚ no error rate determination has been even undertaken‚ and the theory is certainly not yet generally accepted in the scientific
Premium Crime Prison Scientific method
started in 1994‚ things got ugly. Carter changed his testimony on more than one occasion. Carter’s allegations went from including Graves to not including Graves and his story went back and forth this way. Just before he hit the stand Carter recanted once again; his lawyer‚ Charles Sebesta decided not to tell anyone about this change in testimony. According to Sebesta‚ “I [Sebesta[would have hated to have gone to the jury without Carter’s testimony.”
Premium Crime Capital punishment Prison
Stages of A Criminal Trail Nancy Jane Strayer University One stages of a criminal trial is the presentation of evidence‚ first the state is given the opportunity to present evidence intended to improve the defendant’s guilt. After prosecutors have rested their case‚ the defense is afforded the opportunity to provide evidence favorable to the defendant. Types of Evidence Evidence can be either direct or circumstantial. Direct evidence
Premium Crime Criminology Criminal law
Republic of the Philippines Regional Trial Court National Capital Judicial Region Pasig City People of the Philippines‚ Complainant‚ -versus- Criminal Case No. 12345-H For: Violaltion of R.A 6539 (Anti-Carnapping Act) Romulo Takad‚ Accused. x--------------------------------------------x MEMORANDUM The accused‚ through counsel‚ respectfully submits that: Statement of the case This case seeks to establish that the accused‚ Romulo Takad‚ is guilty beyond reasonable doubt
Premium Criminal law Lawyer Crime
Making an Informative Speech When you make an informative speech you are explaining something to your audience. An informative speech can be a description of an object‚ a demonstration of a process‚ a report about an event‚ or an explanation of a concept (Menke)‚ but make sure that the speech is also useful for your audience because it is relevant and it provides "a thoughtful or unique insight on the topic" (Phillips‚ n.d.). Here is more from Terry O’brien Menke on what an informative speech
Premium Rhetoric Citation Audience
Why is the jury taking so long? Usually they have their verdict within the hour‚ but it has been three. Every minute feels like an hour. Finally the jury is back in. I’m so nervous what if they find him guilty. No our evidence is too strong I think we have this case in the bag. Here it is… “ We‚ the jury‚ find Tom Robinson guilty of raping Mayella Ewell.” It can’t be‚ he’s innocent. How could this happen. I’m going to scream‚ we had all this incriminating evidence‚ but still the jury can’t see that
Premium To Kill a Mockingbird Harper Lee Black people