Summary of Tan Sri Eric Eng Hock cases Tan Sri Eric Chia Eng Hock or commonly known as Eric Chia is a millionaire in Malaysia ad is a former chairmain of Perwaja Steel. In June 2007‚ Chia discharge committing criminal breach of trust 13 years ago when embezzling money from the company of Perwaja Rolling Mail and Development Sdn Bhd of RM $76.4 million at 19 February 1994 when was the Managing Director. In his cases‚ Perwaja Rolling Mill and Development Sdn Bhd in Kuala Lumpur instructed American
Premium Credit card Kuala Lumpur Corporation
Fundamentals of corporate strategy Student: Jesse Trost Case study: Kellog‘s Date: 01.10.2013 Question 1: Explain what is meant by a premium brand. Generally speaking‚ one can say a premium brand is a brand of excellent quality and value. Futhermore‚ a premium brand is a brand that has a particular value to a market because of the design‚ inventiveness and quality that it provides. In addition to this‚ a successful brand name will encourage loyalty amongst consumers who will be more likely
Premium Communication Brand management Advertising
Sandy Cheng CASE BRIEFS Interhandel Case (Switz. v. U.S.)‚ 1959 I.C.J. 6 (Mar. 21) Case Facts The Interhandel case was brought before the Court by Switzerland on October 2nd‚ 1957 to declare that the United States was under an obligation to restore its assets which had been vested in the United States from 1942. In 1946‚ US and Switzerland entered an agreement called the Washington Accord that the US will unblock Swiss assets in the US. Interhandel is a Swiss company entered in the Commercial
Premium United States United States Declaration of Independence
and an arbitral tribunal was held. The case history does not specify the identity of presiding arbitrators or any further details of the parties during the proceedings. The tribunal found that there was a fundamental breach and held an arbitration award in favor of the Austrian buyer. No other domestic law or rules of private international law were applied. The details of the result of the proceedings are not stated and remain unclear‚ as arbitrary cases are confidential with respect to the parties
Premium Contract Breach of contract Contract law
Contents Case Question #1 3 Conclusion 3 Overview: 3 Contractual operational risk management/mitigation arrangements 3 Case Question #2 4 Conclusion 4 More accurate analysis of political risk 4 Involvement of a local partner 5 Better Dealing of MOU & PPA 5 Case Question #3 5 Conclusion 5 Mitigating political risks 5 Mitigating economical risks 6 ENRON: DABHOL POWER PROJECT Case Question #1 Critically analyze and comment on the contractual operational risk management/mitigation arrangements
Premium Risk Maharashtra Contract
CASE BRIEFS: LEGAL ETHICS INTRODUCTION TO COMMON LAW CASE AUTHORITY 5th Semester 1. Togstad v. Vesely‚ Otto‚ Miller & Keefe‚ (1980) Facts: Mr. Togstad was paralyzed by negligent doctors. Mrs. Togstad approached Miller seeking legal advice on her malpractice case. After a standard interview‚ Miller stated that he didn’t think that she had a case. However‚ Miller never ordered medical records‚ nor did he advise her of the two-year statute of limitations. Mrs. Togstad relied on Miller’s
Premium Lawyer Law
LearningAustralia • Brazil • Japan • Korea • Mexico • Singapore • Spain • United Kingdom • United States PART i Human Resource Management in Perspective: Environment and Legal Issues — 1 THE HRM FUNCTION/ENVIRONMENT I . CASE The New Director of Human Resources 3 2. CASE The Human Resource Function of Harrison Brothers Corporation 9 3. EXERCISE Developing Environmentally Friendly HR Policies at City University 14 4. EXERCISE Human Resource Challenges during Mergers 17 s . EXERCISE Scanning the
Premium Human resource management Human resources Management
Facts: The Negro plaintiffs in these cases were denied admission schools attended by the white children under the laws requiring or permitting segregation according to race. All the court adhered to the “separate but equal” doctrine and held that the plaintiffs were not admitted to the white schools (except for the plaintiff in the Delaware case). In the instant cases‚ the plaintiffs contend that segregated public schools are not “equal” and they are deprived of the equal protection of the laws.
Premium Plessy v. Ferguson Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Brown v. Board of Education
Pepsi Cola Products Philippines‚ Inc. (petitioner) v. Honorable Secretary of Labor (respondents) 1. Facts: a. June 1990: The Pepsi-Cola Employees Organization-UOEF (Union) filed a petition for certification election with the Med-Arbiter seeking to be the exclusive bargaining agent of supervisors of Pepsi-Cola Philippines‚ Inc. (PEPSI). i. Med-Arbiter granted this stating that PCEU-UOEF was an affiliate of Union de Obreros Estivadores de Filipinas (or the Federation) with two (2) rank and file
Premium Trade union Collective bargaining Employment
Case #4 Fighting Grime (Clorox Company) This is a fun case in that it involves branded products that students will recognize yet probably do not associate with Clorox. A good way to introduce the case could be to bring in product samples or show the brand names of their many products and ask students what they have in common? The case is short and vivid and can be assigned ahead or simply read in class. It is an easy case to grasp quickly yet provides some very clear examples of strategic
Premium Strategic management