The first argument is by J.J Thomson regarding abortion when it happens during consensual sex. She says that the woman has no obligation to keep the child‚ even though the woman had consensual sex and understood that she could become pregnant. Marquis talks about how everyone has a FLO account‚ and abortion would be killing‚ and killing causes premature death‚ so therefore‚ he believes that abortion is immoral in all cases including consensual sex. Judith Jarvis Thomson gives an analogy when it
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Abortion debate
Marquis argues that killing a fetus deprives it of a valuable future/future like ours‚ and concludes by saying abortion is not morally permissible. I agree with Marquis’s argument that it is wrong to kill a fetus through abortion because I believe that they have a valuable future as all humans do. Abortion is defined as the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy‚ which is most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy. (dictionary.com) Furthermore I do agree with Marquis that majority
Premium Pregnancy Abortion Fetus
Summary and Critique of Don Maquis- Anti-Abortion Argument The key element of Don Marquis argument is in the effort to distinguish the difference between abortion and contraception in order to provide a clear argument against abortion‚ aside from extreme cases. Without conflicting with the interest of the general public by being forced to suggest contraception is ethically wrong as well. When he compiles his argument he begins by providing the argument for a ‘pro-choice’ approach which makes the
Premium Morality Abortion Human
fetuses do not have a right to life. She argues that fetuses are not persons because they lack the basic qualifying traits of personhood or moral humanity. She also believes that the rights of persons will always override the rights of potential persons and that there should be no restrictions on when an abortion must occur by. Her argument is a direct response to Noonan’s thesis which is that fetuses are humans and therefore have human rights. Noonan argues that “it is wrong to kill innocent human
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Morality
Perfectly Accurate – Boonin and Oddie encapsulate what Marquis argues in his paper “Why abortion is Immoral” in a concise way that puts the argument into perspective. However‚ the presentation of arguments in the Boonin book could be considered slightly misleading in not capturing Marquis’s attempt to address the nonhuman animals issue in his paper. Marquis’s argument involves abortion‚ or the termination of a fetus. A fetus being the unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception. By
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Fetus
Denisha Smallwood Quiz 4 1 )The relationship between Thompson’s and Marquis’ arguments are very different‚ but I believe both are compatible with each other. They both take the personhood out of the question‚ so there is no debate on if the fetus is a human in the womb. Marquis discusses voluntary conception and Thompson does not really discuss that. Thompson’s conclusion deals more with the exceptional cases that Marquis doesn’t explain at all. Thompson weighs the rights of the individuals involved
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Fetus
Philosophy Paper 1 Why Abortion Is Immoral In this paper I will formally reconstruct Don Marquis’ argument‚ explain it‚ and offer a brief evaluation. In his essay‚ “Why Abortion Is Immoral‚” Marquis argues that abortion is‚ except possibly in rare cases‚ seriously immoral‚ because it is in the same moral category as killing an innocent adult human being. His argument can be formulated as follows: killing an innocent human being is morally wrong. If abortion falls into the category if killing
Free Human Morality Religion
"Marquis versus Thomson on Abortion" The debate about abortion focuses on two issues; 1.) Whether the human fetus has the right to life‚ and‚ if so‚ 2.) Whether the rights of the mother override the rights of the fetus. The two ethicists who present strong arguments for their position‚ and who I am further going to discuss are that of Don Marquis and Judith Thomson. Marquis’ "Future Like Ours" (FLO) theory represents his main argument‚ whereas‚ Thomson uses analogies to influence the reader of her
Premium Abortion Argument Abortion debate
Abortion: Should be illegal & is immoral Many people believe that abortions should be legal because women should have the right to choose whether or not they want to bring a baby into the world. They believe a woman should have property rights which include the body and the fetus. They also believe a woman should have privacy rights which means the state should not interfere with private matters. These people are called pro choice. At the same time many people are anti-abortion because they
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Human rights
Legalization of Abortion in Costa Rica: Pro-Choice Or Pro-Life? Lil Marie Apéstegui F Universidad de Costa Rica Abstract In Costa Rica women are not able to choose whether to have an abortion or not‚ since this procedure is allowed only in order to preserve the life or physical health of the woman and it has to be ordered by a court. Abortions are illegal in almost all cases‚ including when the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest and when the fetus suffers from medical problems or birth defects
Premium Human rights Abortion Pregnancy