5.3 Methods of Inquiry 4 5.4 Definition of Terms 4 5. Reasons Supporting the Use of Offshore Processing of Asylum Seekers 6 by Australia 6.5 Prevention of Deaths at Sea 6 6.6.1 ‘No Advantage’ Principle 6 6.6 Restriction of Business for People Smugglers 6 6. Reasons Against the Use of Offshore Processing of Asylum Seekers by Australia 7 7.7 UNHCR Convention State Responsibilities 7 7.8 Inhumane 7 7.9.2 Non Signature
Premium Refugee
filed asylum application on the minor’s behalf against the fathers wishes. This application was rejected by the Immigration and Naturalization Services as legally void. Plaintiff appealed to the District court‚ which was dismissed because the plaintiff’s father was the solely authorized to apply for the Plaintiffs asylum. Plaintiff appealed the dismissal as vocative of 1158 of the Immigration and Nationally Act of 1996 (INA)‚ 8 U.S.C.S. 1101 et seq. whether the Plaintiff minor applied for asylum within
Free United States Appeal Supreme Court of the United States
custody and filed an asylum application on his behalf against the wishes of his father‚ whom lived in Cuba. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) rejected the application as legally void causing the minor Plaintiff to appeal to the district court. The district court dismissed the case stating that the minor plaintiff’s father was the only one authorized to apply for his son’s asylum. The minor plaintiff argued that the law did not state the validity of the asylum application. The court
Premium Law United States Appeal
why the Australian government should be obliged to welcome asylum seekers who use illegal methods to come here. We have the responsibility to protect our borders and way of life against what could amount to a huge arrival of immigrants whose backgrounds and possible criminal status are unknown. Australia shouldn’t accept the refugees as they are over populating the country and if we do more and more will come. People believe that asylum seekers deserve a fair go just like everyone else‚ but why
Premium Australia Crime Refugee
Paralegal RE: Jane Doe’s Asylum Case DATE: August 16‚ 2000 Questions Presented 1. Whether Jane‚ a minor‚ would be able to file a petition for asylum on her own behalf? 2. Whether Billy‚ the minors uncle and non-custodial adult‚ would be able to file a petition for asylum on behalf of Jane‚ if being a minor is an issue? 3. Whether Jane can use claims of physical abuse and being used as a governmental propaganda tool as grounds for filing a petition for asylum under United States law
Premium United States Law of the United States Parent
persuasive‚ and refers to specific facts sufficient to demonstrate that the applicant is a refugee.” 8 U.S.C.A. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(ii) (West 2009). Analysis: I. Eligibility Anyone who is present in the United States‚ regardless of status‚ may apply for asylum. 8 U.S.C.A. § 1158(a)(1) (West 2009). However‚ eligibility is determined on the basis of refugee status. 8 U.S.C.A. § 1158(b)(1)(A) (West 2009). Refugee status is established by having a foreign nationality and either suffering previous persecution
Premium Family Mother Father
of his inspection and placed him in the care of his paternal great uncle‚ Lazaro Gonzalez‚ who resides in Miami‚ Florida. On January 19‚ 2000 Lazaro Gonzalez‚ plaintiff filed this lawsuit‚ alleging that the INS lacked the authority to reject the asylum applications and was required by federal statutes and regulations to accept and adjudicate those applications. Defendants urge this Court to dismiss the action or‚ alternatively‚ to grant summary judgment. Defendants attack the Complaint on various
Premium United States Constitution United States Supreme Court of the United States
Asylum seekers‚ a case study report from the Somali community in Camden A Research project by Abdi Kadir Ahmed [pic] [pic] [pic] CONTENTS 1. Abstract -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 2. Introduction --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 3. Literature review---------------------------------------------------------------------5
Premium Somalia Somali people Ethiopia
how this has had an influence on attitudes towards mental health and mental illness. Firstly some background information is needed. Before the 18th century the responsibility of the mentally ill lay with the family and community. The first Lunatic Asylum recorded in Europe was the Bethlem Royal Hospital in London‚ founded in 1247‚ later known as Bedlam‚ first hosting the mad in 1370s.(Bedlam book p2). In 1774 The Madhouse
Premium Psychiatry Mental disorder Psychiatric hospital
------------------------------------------------- CC: Tony T. Smith Gonzalez v. Reno‚ 212 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2000) Procedural History: Plaintiff‚ Elian Gonzalez‚ a six year old minor‚ through his “next of friend”‚ Lazaro Gonzalez‚ filed an asylum application with the INS (Immigration & Naturalization Service)‚ which was denied. The plaintiff’s then filed a claim in the federal district court which stated the Plaintiff’s due process rights were violated and the INS had overstepped their
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Supreme court