LEGT 5512 LEGAL FOUNDATIONS FOR ACCOUNTANTS SESSION 2‚ 2010 CASE LIST This Case List is not intended to cite every case quoted in lectures and tutorials during the course. Its purpose is to give students a handy citation of a number of leading cases with brief statements to help identify them. This list may not be taken into the Final Examination. 1. 2. 3 Commonwealth v State of Tasmania (1983) 46 ALR 625 Federal and State powers Lee v Knapp [1967] 2 QB 442 “Stop after accident” – golden rule Smith
Premium Tort Contract Invitation to treat
Ngau Student ID : 1300900002 Lecturer Name : Miss Irene Kho Programme Title : B.A (Hons) in Event and Tourism Management Subject Code & Title : Business Research Method – HC 203 Session : May – August 2010 Assignment Topic : Case Studies (Assignment 1) ATTENTION: 1) 1 day late from the date of submission - 25% will be deducted. 2 days late from the date of submission - 50% will be deducted. More than 2 days late from the date of submission - “0”grade will be awarded
Premium Case study Scientific method Problem solving
CASE-3 ATLANTIC HOME LOAN: I. Determine which category the case fits into: This case is diagnostic in nature and Albert Fiorini failed in checking the management failures. Based on the case facts‚ supposed to identify the lapse in control measures and propose solutions to them. II. Describe the case This case is talking about the illegal takeover of company “Atlanta Home Loan” by Albert’s partner cum manager Wilbur Washington. a. What are the facts of the case? Albert Fiorini (Al) founded
Premium Management Control Health club
Without an effective and efficient team‚ Richardson won’t be able to reach her goals and may suffer from the consequences. After analyzing each member‚ I have recommendations for Richardson and what her plan of action should be with each member. Alex Hoffman is a vital asset for ColorTech with being their top salesman. His arrogance though needs to be put to an end and he needs to be fully committed to bringing in high numbers. Richardson should have a personal meeting with Hoffman (as well as the
Premium Management Marketing Project management
Running head: Savor Case Study 1 Savor Case Study Running head: Savor Case Study 2 Case Recap The company has admitted that a problem is expanding without sacrificing business
Premium Marketing Management Marketing plan
apply the elements of the Tort of Negligence. Scope It includes the nature of general tortuous liability，the nature of employer’s liability，the application of the elements of the Tort of Negligence and vicarious liability. Background to study Case study No. 1 Facts: A bus belonging to Xiamen Bus Co Ltd had hit a school child on the pedestrian passing zone and was killed. Upon the occurrence of accident the driver was arrested by the police for killing in negligence. The deceased child’s family
Premium Tort Tort law
competitive business environment‚ Izo-a new market entrant- is facing a number of distribution challenges. This case highlights the problems faced by Izo in managing one of its distributors‚ POC‚ in its quest to quickly increase its market share. Simultaneously‚ the case also highlights the key sales management issues when dealing with matured markets specially when dealing with tough customers. This case can be covered while teaching any of these courses- strategic marketing‚ distribution management‚ or sales
Premium Petroleum
Danimal Case The case focuses on management innovation in the South African dairy industry‚ describing how an innovative new yoghurt product‚ Danimal‚ was created specifically for the market at the base of the pyramid. It explains how management of the product line embodied the various innovation opportunities and challenges presented. The concept was initially introduced in order to assess the feasibility of profitably servicing this market. However‚ the project was not simply about introducing
Premium Marketing Management
behalf that it was an entire and indivisible contract for the erection and installation of two lifts‚ and that the materials furnished were only in execution of the works contract and there was no sale of any goods and materials by the applicants. In case the determination was that it was not an entire and indivisible contract but constituted two separate contracts‚ one for the sale of
Premium Contract
Case 1: Sunrise bank recently appointed the accounting firm Smith‚ Godfroy‚ and Hannaford as the bank’s auditor. Sunrise quickly became one of Smith‚ Godfroy‚ and Hannaford’s largest clients. Subject to banking regulations‚ Sunrise must provide for any expected losses on notes receivable that Sunrise may not collect in full. During the course of the audit‚ Smith‚ Godfroy‚ and Hannaford determined that three large notes receivable of Sunrise seem questionable. Smith‚ Godfroy‚ and Hannaford discussed
Premium Social responsibility Corporate social responsibility Audit