Vandiveer disclosed the misconduct and fraud of Goodrich and turned into a government witness in the litigation. Vandiveer faced dilemmas throughout the case: to follow his personal value and professional responsibility to refuse unethical action or to follow the managers’ order to keep the job; and to keep loyalty to the company or to be a whistleblower to disclose the fraud. In general‚ Vandiveer behaved by his personal values. However‚ some actions by Vandiveer are open to question. Visibility: Vandiveer
Premium Ethics Morality Falsifiability
Rockport Rebel‚ negligence is a “conduct‚ which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others”. And in this case‚ Mechanics National Bank failed to remove the lien on Ms. Warren’s Lagoon Beach property‚ which means it‚ fell beneath the standard for civic protection recognized by law. “Every one is responsible‚ not only for the result of his willful acts‚ but also for an injury occasioned to another by his want of ordinary care or skill in the management of his property or person
Premium Contract Law Tort
Case analysis：vector aeromotive corporation (evaluate the effectiveness of a board of directors and its actions) John Pope‚ a member of the board of directors of Vector Aerarnotive Corporation‚ had a lot on his mind as he drove to his office‚ It was March 22‚ 1993‚ the day Vector’s board had agreed to ask formally for the resignation of the company’s president and founder‚ Gerald A‚ (Gerry) Wiegert‚ Gerry had already been informed that if he did not resign he would be fired‚ John hoped that Gerry
Premium Management Board of directors Corporate governance
the scene with 2/3 of $18 million project already spent. He is therefore faced with a lot of pressure to continue on the course of action and approve the roll-out. This is a clear manifestation of the "DEAF EFFECT" despite clear warnings from whistleblowers / experts. Politics has also complicated the situation with 1) the question on Storey’s credibility‚ and 2) Benari managing the project‚ thus wanting to put his Trust Operations in the "spotlight". SOME CONCERNS RAISED AGAINST THE PROJECT‚ HOW
Premium Project management
African Consolidated Resources Plc and Others Minister of Mines and Mining Development and Others (HC 6411/07) [2010] ZWHHC 86 (6 September 2010) Download original filesPDF format RTF format | | Bookmark/share this page | [Context] [Hide Context] HH 205-2010 HC 6411/07 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE HELD AT HARARE In the matter between:- AFRICAN CONSOLIDATED RESOURCES Plc and DASHALOO INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD and POSSESSION INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD and HEAVY STUFF INVESTMENTS
Premium Appeal Court Judge
TO: Alexis Schlamberg FROM: RE: Natalie Attired Case DATE: November 19‚ 2013 Statement of the Facts Natalie Attired‚ 23‚ was fired from her position as a waitress at Biddy’s Teahouse for having a visible tattoo. The owner‚ Biddy Baker fired Miss Attired because she would not remove the tattoo and feared that an employee having a tattoo that was visible would upset her more “mature” patrons‚ which would affect profits. No documentation could be provided that showed a loss of profits
Premium Law Employment Common law
Legal Issues in Management Final Case Study Christine Stout Southern Oregon University Business law – case study The case study of John and Stacey has so many complicated elements that apparently all the stakeholders involved apart from the two mentioned could sue or be sued against. This paper assumes that this is the scenario for this paper. The characters involved are John and Stacy‚ a restaurant owner‚ the owner of a townhouse‚ the owner of the mink on which John tripped and subsequently
Premium Contract Law
(negligently) runs over another while driving carelessly has committed a tort of battery based on negligence Duty of Care The reasonable person standard The law does not require perfection‚ only what is reasonable under the circumstances In the case of a professional such as a doctor‚ engineer or accountant‚ that standard is a reasonable doctor‚ engineer or accountant. SQUISH LA FISH v. THOMCO Issue Did the defendant fail to take reasonable care that the information it provided was correct
Premium Tort law Tort Negligence
Legality and Ethicality of Corporate Governance ETH 376 Ethics Case 3-3: United Thermostatic Controls Case The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the legality and ethicality of the corporate governance activities that occurred in an ethics case presented in the text. The paper will provide relevant details regarding the legality of the activities‚ the criteria by which Sarbanes-Oxley would apply to this case‚ the ethicality of the activities‚ whether or not the activities were equitable
Premium Management Corporate governance Corporation
The interesting events from CoBot’s standpoint are those‚ which were not expected or least expected to happen‚ from the CoBot’s past task execution data. We define these interesting events as anomalies-- deviation from the expected data. The expected value for an event can be computed from the respective log table‚ we create by analyzing the bag files. Using the expected data we identify the instances which are anomalies‚ and verbalize them comparing it with a past instance or the expected data for
Premium Management Data mining Scientific method