Valuation of Brand “Coca-Cola” Project Report‚ Valuations and Real Options Contents Executive Summary 4 COCA-COLA Company 5 Coca-Cola Brand 7 Relevance of the Study 7 Why Coca-cola 8 Objective of the Study 9 Literature Review 9 Data Source 10 Valuation Methodologies 10 Income based valuation methods (Dividend Discount Approach) 11 Valuation Description 12 Method 1: 3 stage Dividend Discount Model approach 12 Method 2: Relative Valuation Approach 14 Method 3: Cost Based Approach
Premium Coca-Cola Brand Diet Coke
A12-04-0025 Coca-Cola’s Marketing Challenges in Brazil: The Tubaínas War Introduction For about a decade‚ the Coca-Cola Company’s Brazilian subsidiary tried to stop the growth of tubaínas (too-bah-ee’-nas). The word tubaínas designates numerous brands of fairly inexpensive‚ carbonated‚ and rather sweet beverages sold throughout Brazil. For more than half a century‚ hundreds of micro‚ and a few medium-size‚ manufacturers produced and distributed the so-called tubaínas on a local or regional basis
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2009‚ 2008 Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Income Percent Change Year Ended December 31‚ 2009 2008 2009 vs. 2008 (In millions except percentages and per share data) $ $ % NET OPERATING REVENUES 30‚990 31‚944 (2.99)% Cost of goods sold
Premium Balance sheet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Financial ratios
marketing environment of Coca Cola. Before Neville Isdell was brought out of retirement in 2004‚ Coca Cola’s main product focus was single mindedly devoted to the traditional cola‚ producing ‘syrupy concentrate for bottlers‚ under license‚ to transform into the world’s favourite drink.’(Jobber‚ 2010) But in the face of changing consumer’s attitudes towards soft drinks and the pushing of healthier choices by the state governments‚ (Fresh! Healthy Vending‚ 2010) Coca Cola was slowly losing out to
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink
1 I. Introduction “Coca-Cola and Shasta.” These two products are in the same industry and both were invented around the same time. Nonetheless‚ a very different perception comes to consumers‟ mind when they hear these two words. In the 21st cent ury‚ Coca-Cola is considered one of the most valuable brands in the world‚ whereas Shasta is mostly known in United States‚ particularly in the West Coast region. Coca-Cola is owned and operat ed by The Coca-Cola Company‚ and Shasta is currently owned
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink Revenue
Coca Cola’s operations have been blamed for exacerbating or causing stress on local water resources in some less developed countries. Review and discuss the evidence. Coca-Cola is the world’s largest beverage company offering more than 400 brands in over 200 countries. Multi-national corporations such as Coca-Cola are synonymous with globalisation and renowned for prioritising economic growth over environmental and social well-being. In their pursuit to maximise profits Coca-Cola has been accused
Premium Water Drinking water Water crisis
Case 1: Global Human Resource Management at Coca-Cola 8/16/2013 1. What is Coca-Cola’s staffing policy for managerial position: ethnocentric‚ polycentric‚ or geocentric? Does this policy make sense? I believe Coca-Cola’s staffing policy for managerial positioning is primarily polycentric; however‚ I also believe it involves many characteristics of both ethnocentric and geocentric staffing policies as well. According to Dowling‚ et al‚ a polycentric staffing approach involves the multinational
Premium Management Globalization Human resource management
beverage industry Coca-Cola Company is one “of the most powerful companies on the globe” (Petanjek‚ 2013). The primary competitor of Coca-Cola Company is PepsiCo (“Bottled and Canned‚” n.d.). A 2012 article in Beverage Digest claimed that both Coca-Cola and PepsiCo together held nearly 90% of the soda market (Lambert‚ 2012). Furthermore‚ Beverage Digest reported Coca-Cola outperformed PepsiCo in both carbonated soft drinks (CSDs) and liquid refreshment beverages (LRBs) (“Special Issue‚” 2014). In spite
Premium Coca-Cola
Audit Risk Analysis Project The Coca-Cola Company Kimberly Williams Liberty University MEMORANDUM To: From: Kimberly M. Williams‚ CFE Subject: Audit Risk Analysis of The Coca-Cola Company Date: August 14‚ 2011 I have carefully used information derived from the company and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to assess the risk of accepting The Coca-Cola Company as an audit client. My research was based on careful analysis of recent developments and key items including recent
Premium Balance sheet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Asset
Analysis of an Organization: Traci Jancasz June 15‚ 2010 MGT 540: Diversity Professor Venecia Morris Graduate School of Management Table of Contents Introduction 3 Racial Discrimination Issues 3 “Quota Cola” Case 3 Cincinnati Case 4 Hawaii Case 4 Coca-Cola Company Reaction to Lawsuits 5 Analysis of Coca-Cola Diversity Initiatives 8 Works Cited 10 ------------------------------------------------- Introduction In order for any organization to flourish‚ there must be inclusion of cultural diversity
Premium Discrimination Coca-Cola Thums Up