wrong led me to an article about an interesting experiment: The Milgram experiment. This experiment‚ developed and run by Stanley Milgram‚ took place at Yale University in 1961. Milgram’s experiment consisted of having volunteers from a diverse range of backgrounds and occupations individually brought into a room and sat at a table with an array of levers. Across from this volunteer was another person who knew about the parameters of the experiment‚ who was strapped into a fake electric chair. A
Premium
Critique of The Hawthorne Experiments Biography Written by Fritz J. Roethlisberger (1898 – 1974)‚ The Hawthorne Experiments‚ explores the experiments‚ results and conclusions of studies performed at the Hawthorne Plant of the Western Electric Company. The Hawthorne Effect is the theory that resulted from the studies. Roethlisberger‚ a key member of the team‚ joined the team in 1927 and actively participated in the research until 1936‚ first as Elton Mayo’s assistant and later as his collaborator
Premium Maslow's hierarchy of needs Motivation
Cody Porter ACP Comp‚ Period 2 November 25‚ 2013 Redo Critique Paper Diana Baumrind’s Review on Obedience Experiments from Stanley Milgram In Diana Baumrind’s “Review on Obedience Experiments from Stanley Milgram‚ she asserted that his experiments were unethical in its procedure. She also states the main idea that the variables in the experiments could have affected their results of obedience. Baumrind points out that there should have been more and better steps in having safer tests in protecting
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Experiment
learning about the Stanley Milgram experiment‚ I found myself questioning why and how the majority of the subjects that participated in the experiment were willing to inflict apparent pain and injury on an innocent person‚ and found myself curious as to how I would react should I but put in the same situation. I believe that the most significant reason for this disturbing absence of critical thinking and moral responsibility is because the subjects involved in the experiment were blinded by authority
Premium Stanford prison experiment Critical thinking Milgram experiment
SUMMARY OF MILGRAM ARTICLE The Milgram (1963) article is about an experiment that was conducted on the Yale University campus on obedience. A newspaper ad and mailers were sent out to advertise for participants for an experiment that offered 4.50 just to show up and brought in 40 participants ranging in age‚ education level and occupation. The participants were told that the study had to do with memory and that one participant would be the learner and the other would be the teacher. The teacher
Premium Stanford prison experiment Experiment Yale University
Imagine yourself being shocked as an act of you incorrectly answering a question. In the Milgram Experiment‚ 40 men were recruited using newspaper ads in order to preform a test that would question human obedience. The question posed was: would they comply with an authority figures commands because they were stressed to‚ or would they comply because they thought it was the noble thing to do? The results clearly show that under authority‚ people will comply with what they are told to do even if they
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
Serious Questions about the Stanford Prison Experiment July 15‚ 2008 The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) by Phil Zimbardo has been for me an example of the astonishing things that we humans are capable of. I guess as an example of human gullibility‚ I had not been skeptical about the experiment‚ which lacks quite a few scientific markers (aside from its ethical problems). During a talk by Barbara Oakley‚ she was asked to comment about the SPE because it showed the influence the situation and roles
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
Obedience to Authority and the obedience experiments that produced Stanley Milgram’s famous book have produced almost equal amounts of surprise‚ curiosity and criticism. The criticism of social psychologist John Darley and playwright Dannie Abse are each representative of the general criticism Milgram has received; Darley focuses on whether the study has any relevance to real world events (such as the Holocaust)‚ and Abse focuses on justification of the experiment‚ i.e. was the study worth doing in spite
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
wept and begged to stop believing they had killed the learner. Most of the participants thought that the experiment was real. Milgram came to the conclusion that people obey authority because of the situation they are in and not because they are evil. The study showed the power of authority over our behaviour. High levels of obedience were observed for various reasons such as the experiment was held at Yale university
Free Psychology Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
Derren Brown recreated the Stanley Milgram Experiment. This experiment was used to see exactly how far someone is willing to go‚ to cause harm to someone else just because they are being told to do so. Each participant was told that the person in the other room was going to be asked a series of questions. The person in the other room was going to be required to remember the answers. If they didn’t remember the answers then the participant would shock them with up to 450 volts. The experiment’s goal
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment