horrible and that person is usually then punished. Kant would argue‚ what is the difference then? There is absolutely no good will in infecting a fetus like that to kill it. How ironic it is that a nurse who participated in the trying to abort Gianna would then turn around and try to save her after she realized what they had done had in fact not killed her. According to plato.stanfo.edu‚ in the article‚ “Kant’s Moral Philosophy”‚ the author states‚ “The basic idea‚ as Kant describes it in the Groundwork
Premium Pregnancy Abortion Fetus
Explain the challenges to the moral argument Kant’s moral argument can be summarised in 4 points. Point 1‚ a good will or a person with right moral intentions seeks to bring about the summum bonum. If we take our ethics seriously we can see that we want to achieve the summum bonum. Kant‚ however was adamant that people should not act nice to receive an award at the end of the act. Kant was convinced that an act is only morally good if it is done for its on sake and without any selfish thoughts
Premium Intrinsic value Morality Logic
Cultural Differences America is a melting pot filled with many different cultures and ways of life. In this paper‚ three of the many will be discussed and explained. First‚ will be the Asian American culture‚ next the Latino culture and finally the African American culture. Exposure to these cultures will be imminent in the medical field and the information provided will help one who is looking to work with people from these cultures on a daily basis. Knowing information on a patient’s culture helps
Premium White American United States Hispanic and Latino Americans
The question of what moral relativism is‚ in the kind of society that we live in today all comes down to what we as individuals ought to believe as morally right. As there are many individuals that live on the face of this planet‚ which means there will also be many varying answers as to what can be deemed just/right and what can be deemed wrong. By definition moral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint (for instance‚ that of a culture
Premium Morality Relativism Ethics
took the kingdom. The story involved two groups of people and their moral view on cannibalism. These two groups of people were his people‚ the Greeks‚ and an Indian tribe‚ the Callatians. The Greeks burned their dead; however‚ the Indians ate their dead. Both groups thought what they were doing was morally right because that is what they had become accustomed to.
Premium Herodotus History Achaemenid Empire
Moral relativism is a person’s positions on what’s right or wrong based on a person’s individual choice‚ everyone can decide on what is right for themselves and in this case Anton Chigurh has decided that killing people in order to get what he wants is the right
Premium United States Sociology Decision making
What is the concept of relativist morality: Moral relativism is an opposing perspective from the objective ways of a moral absolutist such as Plato ‚ whose moral standards are fixed regardless of the context. The whole concept of absolutism is universal and deontological; therefore it is unchanging. Whereas Moral relativism is teleological: the outcome of the action is not taken into consideration‚ meaning that moral relativism possesses moral truth that is dependent on place‚ culture‚ time and
Premium Morality Cultural relativism Relativism
King was a man who was brought to this earth to preach his message and teach others. When asked if a moral relativist would have the ability to be as persuasive or eloquent as King‚ it is important to understand what moral relativist believe. According to the Peer Reviewed Academic Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy‚ “Moral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint (for instance‚ that of a culture or a historical
Premium United States
Subjectivism and Cultural Relativism have many short comings that would be less useful in dealing with a social contract like this. These short comings would make using these beliefs useless and in some case reinforce the social contract of this kind of society. Subjectivism
Premium Civil disobedience Martin Luther King, Jr. Nonviolence
the first theory she used to try to make her deci-sion was moral relativism. “Moral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false on-ly relative to some particular standpoint (for instance‚ that of a culture or a historical period) and that no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others” (Westacot). “Take the baby” she said “Take my little girl” (Styron‚ 2014‚ p. 75). Sophie had no choice but to make a not so moral choice. Sophie made the decision to give the little girl (Eva)
Premium Decision making Choice Decision theory