Introduction to Criminal Law CRJS 205 Unit 1 DB My Attorney that I work for has advised the judge (the accused) to file a motion to suppress his statements. Because the arresting officers failed to read the judge his Miranda Rights thus‚ the judge’s statements were illegally obtained. I am in favor of this position‚ because the Judge made statements that may incriminate himself. This is great advise for the opposing counsel to protect his or her client‚ knowing that the prosecution is
Premium Crime Arrest Criminal law
CRJS205-1204A-03 Introduction to Criminal Law Unit 4 Ind. Projects September 13‚ 2012 At Dewey‚ Cheatham‚ and Howe they have dedicated a portion of their practice to helping people that have been accused of a Public Trust Offense‚ get the best legal defense possible from their team of experienced
Premium Theft Criminal law Crime
Criminal Law Paper Gaby Rielle CJA/354 Criminal Law August 12‚ 2014 Mendi Leigh Criminal Law Paper Maryland v. King‚ 569 U.S.‚ on June 3‚ 2013 the United States Supreme Court ruled that it is not a violation of the fourth amendment right by having your DNA swabbed while being booked into a detention facility. And that a simple swab on the inner cheek was no different than taking a photo or being finger printed during the booking process. This case came to be after an individual was arrested
Premium Criminal law Crime Supreme Court of the United States
Explain the term “intention” as the mens rea of a crime using decided cases to support your explanation. The Latin word mens rea‚ when translated means ‘guilty mind’ is defined in the Black’s Law Dictionary as “the state of mind that the prosecution‚ to secure a conviction‚ must prove that a defendant had when committing a crime.” Intention is ‘the purpose or design with which an act is done. It is the foreknowledge of the act‚ coupled with the desire of it‚ such foreknowledge and desire
Free Criminal law Actus reus Crime
The Crucial Difference Between Law and Justice Are law and justice the same thing? Many believe the idea that if one disobeys the law‚ they must be brought to justice. However‚ this isn’t always the case. The fact that there is law permitting or forbidding an act that does not determine that it is right or wrong. While justice is meant to be administered with the utmost fairness and equality‚ Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible demonstrates that this does not always prevail. In The Crucible by
Premium Salem witch trials The Crucible
Week 2 Mens Rea The defendant’s mental state. Mens Rea and Actus Reus are necessary for a crime; apart from in strict liability crimes when mens rea is not necessary. Different crimes have different mens rea. Example: murder requires intention to cause death or GBH. Sometimes an offence will have different mens rea for different aspects of the crime. Example: rape needs intention to commit sexual intercourse but only needs recklessness as to whether the victim is consenting
Premium Criminal law
Week 5 Individual Work Diane Emler Everest University Online CJL 3215-6 Concepts of Criminal Law William Elfo August 17‚ 2013 The Choice of Evil Defense is also called the General Defense of Necessity. This defense justifies an act that may be a crime but is done to prevent a greater evil. “the choice of evil’s defense consists of proving that the defendant made the right choice‚ the only choice—namely‚ the necessity of choosing now to do a lesser evil to avoid a greater evil” (Samaha‚ 2014). The
Premium Criminal law
Midterm Criminal Law State v. Doug Homicide: The unlawful taking of the life of one human being by another. Actual Causation : The defendant’s act must have been the “cause in fact” of the victim’s death. Without the defendant’s actions‚ the victim would not have died. “But for” Doug shooting and killing Tom‚ he would not have died. Proximate Causation: A defendant’s actions are the proximate cause of the victim’s death if the result occurs as a consequence of the defendant’s
Premium Manslaughter Criminal law Murder
Common law evolved over time as a judge made law (according to doctrine of precedent.) In common law the king was the head of the government. Common law was the law administered by the royal courts and as such a more standardised set of rules based on customary law was gradually enforced throughout the whole of England and countries derived from England. E.g. Australia‚ Canada New Zealand and the United States Common laws rules were too broad to deal with governing a society as complex as England
Free Common law
Difference between Confession and Admission This brings us to the main difference between admission and confession. An admission is a statement that may or may not be a conclusive evidence of a fact in issue or relevant fact but to be a confession‚ the admission must conclusively prove the guilt of the maker of the admission. For example‚ in the case of Veera Ibrahim vs State of Maharashtra‚ AIR 1976‚ a person being prosecuted under Customs Act told the customs officer that he did not know that
Premium Criminal law Legal burden of proof Jurisdiction