Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 Daniel Alvalle BUS 670 Legal Environment Instructor: Peter McCann 7/29/2013 If you were an investor would you want your money protected? Would you be skeptical about investing in companies since the securities fraud scandals that have happened recently? The answer is most likely‚ “yes”‚ to a certain degree. With the news about unethical business practices and companies not following regulatory guidelines‚ it is difficult to ignore the risk that is involved
Premium Enron Public company Finance
Innocent: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Hunter‚ B. (2007). Punishing the innocent: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Retrieved from www.fee.org/files/docLib/0703hunter.pdf ARTICLE SYNOPSIS Hunter’s article examines how the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX Act) is too stringent and gives too much power over companies to governing bodies‚ i.e. the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) (Hunter‚ 2007). It discusses how the SOX Act is unfair to domestic and foreign and small and large companies‚ their shareholders
Premium Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
International‚ lawmakers sought to provide regulations that provide oversight on the way corporations report financial data and to ensure that stockholders were protected. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was put in place to combat deceit‚ improve the consistency of financial reporting‚ and reestablish the confidence of investors (Wagner & Dittmar‚ 2006). One of the declaring regulation within this major law is that the management of a company is responsible for its internal control structure and that a
Premium Ethics Enron Morality
holding company which was agreed under Section 15 of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007. The company runs a fully combined exchange‚ proposing the complete series of exchange-related services. This includes trading‚ clearance‚ settlement and repository services. There are many public listed companies in the Bursa Malaysia but most of these companies are consider going private for several reasons that the SOX act has affect their companies (An Analysis of Why Public Listed Companies Go Private
Premium Enron Corporate governance Financial statements
According to Paragraph 4 of Auditing Standard No. 3 (PCAOB 2004)‚ “The auditor must prepare audit documentation in connection with each engagement conducted pursuant to the standards of the PCAOB. Audit documentation should be prepared in sufficient detail to provide a clear understanding of its purpose‚ source‚ and the conclusions reached. Also‚ the documentation should be appropriately organized to provide a clear link to the significant findings or issues.” Referring to Paragraph 4‚ the audit
Premium Management Auditing Audit
Accounting and Auditing Differences 1. The main difference between auditing and accounting is that accounting is related to the collection‚ recording‚ analysis and interpretation of financial transactions while auditing refers to the examination of books of accounts along with the evidential documents. However‚ both processes are concerned with the accounting records of a business. While‚ audit report are reliable by the users for few reasons such as : a) To verify some information needed about
Premium Auditing Audit External auditor
Auditing is a systematic process of objectively obtaining and evaluating evidence regarding assertions about economic actions and events to ascertain the degree of correspondence between those assertions and established criteria and communicating the results to interested users (Boynton & Johnson‚ 2006). In auditing there are many attributes that describes the auditor’s work. Elements of the Generally Accepted Auditing Standards are followed by auditors. The Generally Accepted Auditing Standards
Premium Auditing Internal control Financial audit
ModrallR BUS623 Dr. Tonya Curry American Public University 10/20/2013 Ethical Issues While there are an abundance of issues that could be discussed and cases whose precedent we could draw from for the purpose of properly elucidating the points of the assigned topic in reference to John R. Boatright’s “Individual Responsibility in the American Corporate System: Does Sarbanes-Oxley Strike the Right Balance?” assumption that the primary responsibility of corporate responsibility legislation
Premium Business ethics Ethics Corporation
Small and Large Firms Regulatory Costs: The Case of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act By James A. Millar and B. Wade Bowen The article first begins with an introduction of how and why the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) came about as a result of large scandals such as Enron and Tyco. Many companies believed that the costs of these new regulations exceeded the benefits‚ which is found prevalent with the addition of section 404 which required an auditor’s opinion on annual financial reports. In particular
Premium Auditing Internal control Audit
Unethical Practices and Behavior in Accounting The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was created to prevent fraudulent financial activities‚ and to provide investors with more accurate financial resources on corporations. Under SOX‚ companies are held accountable if they fail to maintain the requirements that were set forth in the act. The act requires companies to maintain satisfactory internal control measures‚ provide responsible financial reports‚ disclose periodic reports‚ and establish rules
Premium Annual report Internal control Auditing