Regulations and requirements for internal quality assurance in own area of practice: organisation policies and procedures e.g. health and safety‚ equal opportunities‚ recording and reporting‚ quality assurance strategy‚ contribution to internal reviewing processes/self-assessment review (SAR); regulatory bodies e.g. standards‚ levels‚ performance/assessment criteria‚ skills‚ knowledge‚ understanding‚ awarding organisation‚ SSC‚ Ofqual‚ Ofsted‚ employer‚ measure of accountability‚ benchmarking.
Premium Management Evaluation Quality assurance
some of the most extreme examples of gross misconduct regarding fraud in our history. The Waste Management Scandal in 1998. They reported 1.7 billion in fake earnings by increasing the length of depreciation time for property‚ plant and equipment on the balance Page 2 sheets. The fraud was detected when a new CEO was brought in and the new management team went through the books. Motivation seems to be that this publicly traded company needed to keep stock prices up to keep investors and shareholders
Premium Enron
Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) and the Public Companies Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) on Auditing Practice In business‚ there should have various rules and regulation governing in order to avoid mismanagement and frauds associated. In the United States‚ several bodies have been put in place to oversee‚ create registration‚ reporting and‚ providing transparency. Such bodies include‚ the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) which eventually resulted in the creation of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)
Premium Internal control Financial statements Audit
but then appropriates them for his/her use without the rightful owner’s permission. Six (6) cases of embezzlement stand out in Modern day History. The first case is about Yasuyoshi Kato in 1997 who managed to steal $132 million from Day-Lee Foods‚ Inc. of Santa Fe Springs‚ California. At the time‚ Yasuyoshi was the Chief
Premium Fraud Embezzlement
of fraud examiner/forensic accounting profession since the 2001 Enron Fraud After the Enron and WorldCom business climate‚ there came a new US federal law called Sarbanes – Oxley Act. The SOX contains 11 titles that describe specific mandates and requirements for financial reporting. It makes corporate executives more accountable for their actions. Companies invested a tremendous amount of resources‚ time‚ and effort in order to comply with the requirements. It clearly improved the internal control
Premium Auditing Audit Internal control
The main historical fraud in the movie is the title of the record label. The real record label is Chess Records‚ not Cadillac Records. The name Cadillac Records comes from the owner of the record label‚ Leonard Chess buying all of his musicians Cadillacs once the label becomes
Premium Cadillac Records
Director Seminar 7.1: Ethics‚ Fraud Risk and Communication Libby Jones – Chief Accountant Group 6 Marsee Weston – Fixed Asset Manager Overview Scott Smyth – Cash/Debt & Investment Manager Scenario 1 Cathy Elgin – Accounting Assistant (A/R) Scenario 2 Bob Thomas – Accounting Assistant (A/P) Scenario 3 Nora Stewart – Accounting Assistant (A/P) Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Chuck Sanchez – Accounting Assistant (Payroll) Past Fraud Cases 3 4 Combining
Premium Internal control Accounts receivable Accounts payable
10 major steps in the fraud risk model 1. Understand the nature of fraud by identifying the factors associated with fraud that are outlined in the fraud triangle. The factors include rationalization‚ opportunity‚ and incentive (ROI). Incentive/pressure to commit fraud Fraudulent financial reporting Management compensation schemes Financial pressures to improve company’s earnings and balance sheet Personal wealth tied to either financial results or survival of company Defalcation (misappropriation
Premium Auditing Financial audit Internal control
JOHN D.R. LEONARD‚ Plaintiff-Appellant‚ - v. - PEPSICO‚ INC.‚ Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 99-9032 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 210 F.3d 88; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6855; 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 779 March 21‚ 2000‚ Argued April 17‚ 2000‚ Decided PRIOR HISTORY: [**1] Appeal from a grant of summary judgment for Defendant in the Southern District of New York (Wood‚ J.) in an action seeking specific performance of an alleged offer of a Harrier Jet
Premium Contract Pepsi
Impact and Prevention of Inventory Fraud The root of this problem lies within the organizations’ employees. Honest employees are a valuable asset‚ since the theft of inventory costs US companies a great deal of money every year. Perpetrators of this act may rationalize their behavior as not being criminal‚ so where does it begin or where does it stop? There is no easy solution or one way to combat inventory fraud‚ but companies can take measures to prevent this from occurring. Also‚ Organizations
Premium Balance sheet Inventory Fraud