Background The Kardell paper mill was established at the turn of the century on the Cherokee River in southeastern Ontario by the Kardell family. By 1985‚ the Kardell Paper Co. had outgrown its original mill and had encompassed several facilities in different locations‚ generating total revenues of $1.7 billion per year. The original mill continued to function and was the firm’s largest profit center. The Kardell family no longer owned shares in the firm‚ which had become a publicly traded company
Premium Mutual fund Corporate governance Corporate title
[pic] BUSS ETHICS & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CRG 520 CASE STUDY ( KARDELL PAPER CO. ) ( GROUP 2 ) PREPARED BY : FAIZUL HISHAM BIN MOHD ALIAS : 2011672616 AHMAD FAISAL BIN KAMARUZAMAN : 2011837032 NURUL NADIA BINTI MOHD NOOR AZMI : 2011870322 RAJA FARADYNA RAJA ISKANDAR : 2011284874 NORASHIKIN BINTI MD AMIN : 2011405672 PREPARED FOR: MOHD DANIAL AFIQ BIN KHAMAR TAZILAH DATE OF SUBMISSION:
Premium Ethics Decision making
employees have concerns about the health and safety issues linked to Sonox. They must be confirmed they are free from Sonox Poisoning and receive a free medical treatment if they are confirmed infected. The investors cares about this issue because Kardell most likely have to make improvements in the filtering of waste water or convert to a system of recycled water. Any changes that shut down the plant for any period of time will harm the company and the investors also. At the same time‚ they are also
Premium Government Time
An Ethical Analysis of Kardell Paper Company Decision Executive Summery The Board of directors of Kardell Paper Company should accept the installation of the new processing technology witch protects the environment by refining the company’s waste water .Implementing this new technology will increase the company’s long- term profitability and reputation by providing enough power and ability to compete and operate efficiently in the future market. This ethical solution is offered‚ after analyzing
Premium Ethics Term Profit
Little Enough or Too Much 1.) Describe the factual situation Bryan‚ a new employee of the X Chemical company has been placed in charge to oversee the production and construction of their newly released product‚ industrial lubricant. The X Chemical company was built nearby a river and asked permission from the government agencies to release their excess waste into the river. Other companies also reside along the river and are dumping their excess waste into it as well. This strikes as a concern
Premium Ethics Pollution Recycling
Gustafson Business Ethics Mark Matthews‚ Ph.D. February 10‚ 2004 Applying Ethics to the Merck Case The purpose of my essay is to show whether the business decisions made by the management team of Merck pharmaceutical are ethical. Using corporate assets for charitable purposes‚ the company manufactures and distributes a drug called Mectizan at no charge to impoverished nations and their inhabitants. I will expound on three ethical theories and then analyze the Merck case according to each theory
Premium Ethics Morality
SCHOOL OF LAW Year 2013-14 Term 1 LAW001 ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Instructor: David N. Smith Practice Professor‚ School of Law Tel: Email: Office: 6828 0788 davidsmith@smu.edu.sg School of Law‚ Room 4044‚ Level 4 COURSE DESCRIPTION Issues of ethics and social responsibility arise in all professions and all aspects of life. The failure to anticipate‚ recognize and deal effectively with these issues can have serious implications for individuals‚ companies‚ governments
Premium Ethics
The Salomon & Co.[1] case brought about the most significant decision ever laid down in Company Law. The House of Lords decision is the leading authority on the principle that the company [2]‚ which is incorporated under the Companies Acts 1963 is a separate legal entity‚ separate from its members and capable of having a corporate personality of its own‚ as Lord MacNaghten stated in Salomon “a different person altogether”[3]‚ from that of the members‚ almost depicting a fictional character capable
Premium Corporation Subsidiary Legal entities
Merck & Co.‚ Inc (A) (The summary is based on the article in Vol. I and does not include the extra readings given by the professor) This case is a classic example of enterprises trying to balance their business of increasing profits and expected social responsibilities. This dilemma is further accentuated when the company happens to be a pharma company whose decisions directly affect people’s lives. The Dilemma: A possible drug for River Blindness‚ a disease which affects almost 85 million
Premium Pharmacology Medicine Affect
The paper industry faced many challenges during the late 1990s into the early 2000s. Annual returns fluctuated for businesses in this industry and the shift to a “paperless” environment appeared underway. As a result‚ corporations such as Smurfit Paper Company had to be cautious about adding new potential customers. This case study analyzes relevant issues and key factors that influence Smurfit Paper Company’s decision on whether or not to add a new potential customer. These factors include consolidation
Premium Corporation Capitalism Company