[pic] BUSS ETHICS & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CRG 520 CASE STUDY ( KARDELL PAPER CO. ) ( GROUP 2 ) PREPARED BY : FAIZUL HISHAM BIN MOHD ALIAS : 2011672616 AHMAD FAISAL BIN KAMARUZAMAN : 2011837032 NURUL NADIA BINTI MOHD NOOR AZMI : 2011870322 RAJA FARADYNA RAJA ISKANDAR : 2011284874 NORASHIKIN BINTI MD AMIN : 2011405672 PREPARED FOR: MOHD DANIAL AFIQ BIN KHAMAR TAZILAH DATE OF SUBMISSION:
Premium Ethics Decision making
employees have concerns about the health and safety issues linked to Sonox. They must be confirmed they are free from Sonox Poisoning and receive a free medical treatment if they are confirmed infected. The investors cares about this issue because Kardell most likely have to make improvements in the filtering of waste water or convert to a system of recycled water. Any changes that shut down the plant for any period of time will harm the company and the investors also. At the same time‚ they are also
Premium Government Time
Background The Kardell paper mill was established at the turn of the century on the Cherokee River in southeastern Ontario by the Kardell family. By 1985‚ the Kardell Paper Co. had outgrown its original mill and had encompassed several facilities in different locations‚ generating total revenues of $1.7 billion per year. The original mill continued to function and was the firm’s largest profit center. The Kardell family no longer owned shares in the firm‚ which had become a publicly traded company
Premium Mutual fund Corporate governance Corporate title
An Ethical Analysis of Kardell Paper Company Decision Executive Summery The Board of directors of Kardell Paper Company should accept the installation of the new processing technology witch protects the environment by refining the company’s waste water .Implementing this new technology will increase the company’s long- term profitability and reputation by providing enough power and ability to compete and operate efficiently in the future market. This ethical solution is offered‚ after analyzing
Premium Ethics Term Profit
The paper industry faced many challenges during the late 1990s into the early 2000s. Annual returns fluctuated for businesses in this industry and the shift to a “paperless” environment appeared underway. As a result‚ corporations such as Smurfit Paper Company had to be cautious about adding new potential customers. This case study analyzes relevant issues and key factors that influence Smurfit Paper Company’s decision on whether or not to add a new potential customer. These factors include consolidation
Premium Corporation Capitalism Company
Payback period is the time it takes to recoup your initial investment on a project based upon the future cash flows the project is expected to generate. In question one‚ the synthetic resin has a payback period of 2.50 years where as the epoxy resin has a payback period of 1.50 years‚ meaning the company will recoup its initial investment one year sooner with the epoxy resin than with the synthetic resin. If the company were determining which project to choose based solely on the payback period‚
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return
This is where compromise and communication can be a great tool to find balance. If you find yourself avoiding certain areas of conversation because you are worried about the other person and how they might feel or act‚ you might be in a co-dependent relationship. Co-dependency is sometimes referred to as a “relationship addiction‚” because some people may find themselves repeatedly attracted to toxic relationships.
Premium Interpersonal relationship Psychology Communication
Co- Culture: The Co-Culture that I am a part of is a Student Government on a California Community College Campus. This Co-Culture has relation to the dominant American Culture by the Community College students. Values and Beliefs: The main values and beliefs of a Community College Student Government Association is to advocate and to initiate change in the best interest of all students on the campus. A belief of the Student Government is creating a campus atmosphere that students feel they have a
Premium Sociology University Education
views on co-sleeping‚ and the detriment/ benefits of it. Co-sleeping is defined as a parent and baby share a bed‚ according to the March of Dimes. There are obvious reasons why sleeping with your baby could result badly: getting trapped by the bed frame‚ falling off the bed‚ being smothered by blankets‚ or getting rolled on (March of Dimes‚ 1). But a big question that arose
Premium Sudden infant death syndrome Sleep Breastfeeding
Co-sleeping is a practice used by as many as 40% of parents‚ in which they have the baby sleep either in the bed with them at night or in a connected crib. There have been proven to be many benefits of co-sleeping which include increased bonding‚ increased breastfeeding‚ and faster reaction times to the babies cries at night. Parents number 1 fears or reason why they think they shouldn’t co-sleep is the fear that at some time during the night their child might accidentally be suffocated by themselves
Premium Sleep Sleep deprivation Sleep disorder