UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW COURSEWORK FOR (MARITIME LAW ) AUTHOR - ( FARADILA BINTI ROSLAN; 11605537 ) DATE - (20TH FEBRUARY 2012 ) SEMINAR GROUP - (-) SEMINAR TUTOR - ( DR. ARDESHIR ATAI ) SCHEME - (LLMF1) “Where the action is undefended‚ it used to be the case that any judgment would be limited to the value of the res itself. In the light of the reasoning of the House of Lords in The Indian Grace (No. 2)‚ to the effect that‚ after service of in rem proceedings
Premium Common law Law Latin legal phrases
Reading Guide Lecture 1 |COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA | |Copyright Regulations 1969 | |WARNING | |This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf
Premium Corporation Law
1 CHAPTER 1 NATURE OF SALE DEFINITION OF SALE Article 1458 of the Civil Code defines “sale” as a contract whereby one of the contracting parties (Seller) obligates himself to transfer the ownership‚ and to deliver the possession‚ of a determinate thing; and the other party (Buyer) obligates himself to pay therefor a price certain in money or its equivalent.1 The Roman Law concept embodied in the old Civil Code2 that treated delivery of tangible property as the sole purpose of sale has been
Premium Contract
principles of justice and international law‚ adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of peace.[1] All Member States of the UN are obliged to settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a matter that international peace and security and justice are not endangered.[2] It is also an obligation to the States to refrain from the threat of use of force.[3] The effect of Article 1(1)‚ Article 2(3) and Article 2(4) of the UN Charter is
Premium Dispute resolution Arbitration Law
LAW 443 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW I NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF LAW COURSE CODE: Law 443 COURSE TITLE: Administrative Law I 1 LAW 443 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW I Course Code: Course Title: Course Developer/Writer: Administrative Law I Law 443 Simeon Igbinedion‚ LL.B.‚ LL.M.‚ B.L.‚ PH.D.‚ Faculty of Law‚ University of Lagos. Professor Animi Awah Ifidon Oyakhiromen‚ LL.B‚ LLM‚ M.Phil‚ Ph.D‚ BL Course Editor: AG. Dean‚/Programme Leader: Course Coordinator:
Premium Administrative law Law Government agency
Contract Law Introduction In the following case note I will examine the High Court case; Smart Telecom Plc. V Radio Teilefis Eireann & Glanbia Plc. [2006] IEHC 176. The essence of this case is one involving a request for tenders put forward by RTE for sponsorship and the subsequent refusal of Smart Telecom’s referential bid thereto. The questions raised were (1) whether referential bidding was a permissible term of RTE’s offer and (2) if not‚ were they were obliged to re-tender the contract
Premium Contract
Part a) Legal position enabling expulsion of Annabel from the partnership. Step 1:- The problem at hand deals with Partnership law as governed by the Partnership Act 1895 in the absence of a written agreement. Principles of Common law and Equitable principles also apply. Partnership Act governs the partnership of ‘Health Plus’. Sec. 30 of the Act‚ as it relates to misappropriation of partnership property. The application of Sec. 39 Partnership Act 1895 and the Fiduciary Duty breached. Supreme
Premium Partnership Contract
Business Law Assignment; Mistake in contract law‚ is a factual misunderstanding that may lead to a failure of a meeting of the minds. Unilateral mistake is mean that is only one party is mistaken‚ but the other party knows‚ or ought reasonably to be aware of the mistake. Contract may be void or voidable. Void is a contract that is no legal effect. While‚ voidable is an agreement that may be affirmed or rejected at the option of one of the party. The reason why Lord Denning took the view that these
Premium Contract Common law Arbitration
Supremacy of EU law The legal doctrine of supremacy of EU law means that EU labour law takes precedence over domestic labour law. The creation of a new legal order of EU law and its supremacy means that EU institutions may create rules affecting employment and industrial relations‚ even where some Member States oppose such rules and vote against them in those EU institutions‚ provided that a voting procedure based on a majority rule applies to that specific field. Where adopted‚ these rules must
Premium European Union
long had the power‚ in prescribed circumstances‚ to exempt an individual from criminal responsibility for actions performed while incapacitated by a mental disorder. The power (mentioned above) is inherent within “the basic principle of Canadian criminal law that to be convicted of a crime‚ the state must prove not only a wrongful act‚ but also a guilty mind” (Department of Justice‚ 4). Consequently‚ Canada’s Criminal Code has subsequently determined that citizens will not be held criminally liable
Premium Antisocial personality disorder Mental disorder Psychopathy