Case Report Worksheet Case name including citation? Fisher V Bell [1961] 1 QB 394‚ [1960] 3 WLR 919‚ [1960] 3 All ER 731‚ HKSAR V Chow Kwong Chun (unrep.‚ HCMA No 836 of 2001) and HKSAR V Wan Hon Sik [2001] 3 HKLRD 283 were cited in the judgeme Is it a civil case or criminal case? It is a criminal case as Yu Wai Chuen was charged by HKSAR. Who are the parties? The plaintiff (prosecutor) was HKSAR and defendant was Yu Wai Chuen. This was an appeal by Yu Wai Chuen against HKSAR (respondent).
Premium Ratio decidendi Stare decisis Appeal
SUIT TO INTERNATIONAL CATHOLIC MIGRATION COMMISSION (ICMC); THUS‚ BOTH THE LABOR ARBITER AND THE NLRC HAD NO JURISDICTION OVER THE CASE. — The basic issue in this case is whether the Memorandum of Agreement executed on July 15‚ 1988 gave ICMC immunity from suit. The Court holds it did. Consequently‚ both the Labor Arbiter and the NLRC had no jurisdiction over the case. Petitioner’s contention that the Memorandum of Agreement is not an act of Congress which is needed to "repeal or supersede" the provision
Premium United Nations Jurisdiction Government
Company Overview In developed countries‚ car rental companies such as Enterprise‚ Hertz‚ or Avis are everywhere‚ but which company is number one in this industry? Certainly‚ the answer is Enterprise. “Enterprise Rent-A-Car (Enterprise) is a privately held car rental company. It is engaged in vehicle leasing‚ fleet management services and sale of used cars. The company operates in the US and Canada. It is headquartered in St. Louis‚ Missouri and employs 65‚000 people. The company recorded revenues
Premium Car rental companies Car rental Customer
StudyMode - Premium and Free Essays‚ Term Papers & Book Notes Top of Form Bottom of Form Browse topics Sign In Sign Up Research Documents Case Study Analysis The New Plant Manager Toby Butterfield Essays and Term Papers Top of Form Bottom of Form Case Study Analysis: the New Plant Manager Toby Butterfield CASE STUDY ANALYSIS: The New Plant Manager Background Summary Toby Butterfield was promoted as new plant manager of Montclair Company in the Houston plant. The plantation where
Premium Management Case study
Case Study: SK Telecom Goes Egalitarian in a Hierarchical Society Introduction: This case is a convergence of several Human behavioral aspects like power distance and effect of values on professional society as an example ‘organizational hierarchy’. SK telecom South Korean company has organizational hierarchy culture that reflects in South Korea’s cultural value to major extent as well. Power distance has several characteristics. People accepting the unequal distribution of the power
Premium South Korea Hierarchy Government
Managing a Family Business The Vega Food Company March 16‚ 2014 The Vega Food Company case is about the Valle family. Franciso Valle Sr. was the entrepreneur-owner of Industrias La Vega‚ he was married to Isabel and had they had six kids. Five of their kids are girls Rosa‚ 47; Ana‚ 42; Maria‚ 38; Tere‚ 33; and Mari‚ 27 one son Franciso Jr.‚ 45. Franciso Sr. died in 1994 and left Franciso Jr.‚ as his successor. Before Franciso Sr. passed‚ Franciso Jr. was the President
Premium Family Management
by way of case stated by one of the stipendiary magistrates sitting at Bow Street‚ before whom informations were preferred by police officers against the defendants‚ in each case that she ‘being a common prostitute‚ did solicit in a street for the purpose of prostitution‚ contrary to section 1 (1) of the Street Offences Act‚ 1959.’ The magistrate in each case found that the defendant was a common prostitute‚ that she had solicited and that the solicitation was in a street‚ and in each case fined the
Premium Contract
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION‚ PRETORIA CASE NO: CC113-2013 DATE: 2014-09-11‚ 12 In the matter between THE STATE and OSCAR LEONARD CARL PISTORIUS Accused BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE MASIPA ASSESSORS: ADV J HENZEN DU TOIT ADV T MAZIBUKO ON BEHALF OF THE STATE: ADV GERRIE C NEL ADV ANDREA JOHNSON ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENCE: ADV BARRY ROUX SC ADV KENNY OLDWAGE INTERPRETERS: MS F HENDRICKS JUDGMENT VOLUME 42 (Page 3280 - 3351) iAfrica
Premium
Arbiters and the commission. (a) The Labor Arbiters shall have theoriginal and exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide within thirty (30) working days after submission of the case by the parties for decision‚ the following cases involving are workers‚ whether agricultural or non-agricultural: 1. Unfair labor practice cases; 2. Those that workers may file involving wages‚ hours of work and other terms and conditions of employment; 3. All money claims of workers‚ including those based on non-payment
Premium Employment Trade union National Labor Relations Act
illegality‚ and no right of action exists in respect of anything arising out of the transaction. In such a case the maxim In pari delicto‚ portior est conditio defendentis applies‚ and the test for determining whether an action lies is to see whether the plaintiff can make out his claim without relying on the illegal transaction to which he was a party. Halsbury 2nd Ed. Vol. VII p. 173. Case referred to Bowmakers Ltd v Barnet Instruments Ltd (1945) 1 KB 65; (1944) 2 All ER 579 1953 1 MLJ 239
Premium Pleading Complaint Automobile