Maintaining the “Single Samsung” Spirit: New Challenges in a Changing Environment Caryn Ng Kar Yan B1102572 Keah Mei Sian B1102580 Nur Fathiha Bte Johan Ariffin B1100381 Mohd Roshan bin Mohd Yusop B0101223 Sarkunarajah S B1001971 Wan Arjunaidi Bin Awang @ Wan Abdul Halim E0300073 Abstract Samsung portrayed a very interesting and impressive success story in every aspect of development. Although they were hit hard by financial crisis in 2009‚ Samsung survived the ordeal with
Premium South Korea
global smartphone market‚ Samsung (005930) is a force to be reckoned with. The company extended its lead during the fourth quarter as it shipped an astounding 63.7 million smartphones‚ representing 29% of the global market according to research firm IDC. Samsung’s next closest competitor was Apple (AAPL) which sold 47.8 million iPhones for 21.8% of the market during the same time span. The story is much different when it comes to tablets‚ however. IDC estimates that Samsung shipped 7.9 million tablets
Premium Smartphone
technology. I owned almost every product of Apple and I’m really enjoyed using Samsung laptop and printer. The battle between Samsung Electronics Co. and Apple Inc. really attracts public’s attention recently. On April 15th‚ Apple pulled the trigger by claiming that Samsung’s Galaxy line of mobile phones and tablet "slavishly" copies the iPhone and iPad‚ according to court papers. Then on 22nd of the same month‚ Samsung filed patent lawsuits against Apple in South Korea‚ Japan and Germany‚ involved
Premium Apple Inc. Bluetooth
Samsung‚ being the market leader in the television industry in India‚ has decided to launch a new Television brand with some unique features. Before launching the product‚ however‚ it is important for the company to understand the macro environment carefully‚ the current status and the future direction. Demographic Environment – It is important for the company to analyze India as the potential market for launching new brand of television. With a population of over one billion‚ is the second largest
Premium Television Monopoly Economics
In James Poniewozik’s the “The Princess Paradox”‚ he presents an article on modern fairy tales providing strong feminist themes backed with evidence from recent films depicting these tails. While his point that women should be princess like‚ strong‚ as well as independent is clearly stated‚ his erratic sequence of evidence and casual tone takes away from his overall credibility. With unorganized evidence and a hard to read tone it is difficult to take the article seriously. In the author’s article
Premium Feminism Fairy tale Cinderella
Origin Narcissism “The Paradox of Narcissism” by John F. Schumaker targets the idea of promoting self-love and self-happiness as a social problem. Mr. Schumaker does not believe that this school of thought is a positive element in society as a whole. He believes that one should strive to better and promote happiness in others rather than just themselves individually. He see’s this as a product of western society that embraces the idea of I need to feel big and important
Premium Education School Teacher
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0309-0566.htm EJM 44‚7/8 Consumer responses to brand extensions: a comprehensive model ´ ´ Eva Martınez and Jose M. Pina ´ Facultad de Ciencias Economicas y Empresariales‚ The University of Zaragoza‚ Zaragoza‚ Spain Abstract Purpose – This paper aims to understand the reciprocal spill-over effects of brand extensions by testing a comprehensive model that gathers both the brand extension evaluation
Premium Branding Brand equity Brand
The Merger of HP-Compaq Case Question 1: Was the merger sound strategically? HP was already a famous global company in 1990s. Although innovation was still critical to long-term success‚ HP’s industry was maturing and with that came the additional pressure of slimming margins‚ the importance of distribution efficiencies‚ and a more critical need for developing long-term relationships with customer. Although HP was the market leader in imaging and printing‚ its computing and IT-services businesses
Premium Economics Corporation
What exactly was covered in the great Patent Trial of the Century between Apple and Samsung? I’ve had a surprisingly hard time figuring this out. However‚ after reading the verdict‚ the patents themselves‚ and a bunch of news summaries‚ it seems to me that there may be less than meets the eye here. As near as I can tell‚ the jury found Samsung guilty of violating the following Apple patents: Patent 381‚ which covers inertial scrolling (the faster you move your finger‚ the faster a list scrolls)
Premium Apple Inc. Jury Invention
Strength * Samsung enjoys the widest range of product portfolio which includes Mobile phone‚ Tablet‚ TV/Audio/Video‚ Camera‚ camcorder‚ Home appliance‚ pc‚ peripherals‚ printer‚ memory cards and other accessories * Samsung holds significant market share in most of the product categories * Samsung is NO.2 in terms of market share in mobiles‚ it captured Nokia’s market share by superior innovation in smart phones * Samsungs is the best in terms of design features and technology. It
Premium Mobile phone Product management