FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2014] FCAFC 115 Citation: D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2014] FCAFC 115 Appeal from: Cancer Voices Australia v Myriad Inc [2013] FCA 65 Parties: YVONNE D’ARCY v MYRIAD GENETICS INC and GENETIC TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED File number: NSD 359 of 2013 Judges: ALLSOP CJ‚ DOWSETT‚ KENNY‚ BENNETT & MIDDLETON JJ Date of judgment: 5 September 2014 Catchwords: PATENTS – Patent including claims for isolated nucleic
Premium Jury Supreme Court of the United States United States
The case about misappropriation of a trade secret that I researched is Best Buy Co. v. TechForward Inc. What happened was that Los Angeles-based TechForward sued Best Buy for misappropriating an original TechForward trade secret for the Best Buy “Guaranteed Buyback Program” (Star Tribune). The issue with the lawsuit involves what TechForward’s business does for its consumers. What they do (a much smaller business than Best Buy Co.) is calculate the buyback value of various consumer products such
Premium
Case 1.8 Crazy Eddie‚ Inc. Case Summary: At age of 16‚ in 1978‚ Eddie Antar opened Crazy Eddie Inc in New York City. This was an electronics store where leadership positions were assumed by family and relatives. Their excellent advertising techniques through radio and their cut rate prices allowed the company to become “transhipper”‚ selling goods to other electronic retailers in NYC area. Crazy Eddie Inc went public in 1986 in order to finance expansion program and in that year‚ it was
Premium Internal control Auditing Financial audit
Textron Inc. Brief and explanation: In 1984‚ appellant Elaine Tennimon‚ as personal representative of decedent’s estate filed suit for wrongful death against appellee helicopter manufacturer. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee helicopter manufacturer on the ground that appellant’s wrongful death suit was barred by the statute of limitations. Appellant‚ Elaine Tennimon appeals the district courts grant of summary judgment in favor of Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. Facts:
Premium Appeal United States Jury
This case is about an individual named Alex Sander‚ who is 32 years old and a MBA graduate from MIT‚ is a new product manager in the toiletries division for Landon Care Products Inc. Alex is hard working yet narcissist and strives to be flawlessness in his job not understanding that everybody’s ability towards work is different. Alex may be an exceedingly gifted individual‚ a quick learner‚ has entrepreneurial talent with wide market and product knowledge‚ may be self-confident‚ and self-driven.
Premium Management Leadership Employment
CASE: DOUGLAS ELECTRICAL INC Summary: Jim Essinger is a management consultant and training specialist from St. Louis who specializes in continuous process improvement and total quality management. Each month‚ he goes to Springfield‚ Illinois and provides three days of training to employees of a privately owned electrical wholesaler-distributor‚ Douglas Electrical Supply Inc. One of the attendee is Tony‚ from Quincy branch. Based on Jim and Tony’s conversation‚ Tony seem to be confused
Premium Total quality management Employment Process management
Strategic Management and Policy Case Study of Harley-Davidson‚ Inc. August 19‚ 2006 Introduction In 1903‚ a legendary motorcycle company was formed when William S. Harley and the Davidson brothers‚ William D.‚ Arthur and Walter‚ handcrafted their first three motorcycles. In 1909‚ Harley-Davidson introduced the first V-Twin engine‚ which is still the company standard to this day. From 1917-1918‚ the company supplied 20‚000 motorcycles for the military during World War I‚ and during this time
Premium Harley-Davidson Motorcycle
“Most Companies Acts of the region contain a provision requiring directors have to regard to the “interests of company employees in general”. Seemingly introducing a new stakeholder philosophy into company law‚ the precise import and significance of such a requirement remains a mystery.” Discuss. Introduction Company directors are like the shepherds who always try to convince the sheep that their interests and his are one and the same. Alolf Berle and Gardiner Means in Modern Corporation
Premium Board of directors Corporation Fiduciary
CPA Program -- professional level - Global Strategy and Leadership Webinar 5 Case Analysis: Notting Foods Australia Pty Ltd Case Study 2 Semester 1 2013 Authors: Samantha Winter and Delyth Samuel Published by Deakin University on behalf of CPA Australia Ltd‚ ABN 64 008 392 452 © CPA Australia Ltd 2013 The contents and any information contained in this document (Information) are for general information only. They are not intended as professional advice. For any professional advice‚ please
Premium Management Meat Strategic management
Case Study – Profitel Inc. Decision maker: Lars Peeters‚ along with his team of executives Question 1: Which perspective of leadership best explains the problems experienced in this case? Analyze the case using concepts discussed in that leadership perspective. Leadership is defined as the collective effectiveness and successes of organizations members by influencing‚ motivating‚ and enabling others to contribute. In this case Lars Peeters‚ newly appointed CEO of Profitel‚ fails to maintain
Premium Employment Motivation Leadership