"The relevence of common law of judicial precedents in the sharia court system" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 1 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    between two parties‚ the court must first establish what happened. The facts are usually determined by the trial judge. Although in some countries jury may be used‚ in Malaysia‚ it was abolished in the 1980s. Once the facts are determined‚ the judge will then make the application of law to the facts to determine which party would succeed. The doctrine of judicial precedent is important because it is the ratio decidendi of a previously decided similar case‚ decided by a higher court to the current facts

    Premium Common law

    • 5197 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial precedent - Law

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Judicial precedent is based upon the Latin maxim "stare decisis" which loosely translates into "stand by what has been decided and do not unsettle the established". Judicial precedent is the source of law where past decisions of the judges create law for future judges to follow‚ this law can be found in judgement that is binding. Ratio Decidendi is the part of the judgement that is binding. In the English legal system‚ higher courts bind lower courts so lower courts have to follow the past decisions

    Premium Stare decisis Common law Ratio decidendi

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The doctrine of judicial precedent is at the heart of the Common Law system of rights and duties. Judicial precedent is concerned with the major of case law in the common law system‚ it had been described as the legal experience from lawyer’s term. The term of ‘precedent’ there is an implication that what was done before should be done again and which mean a good guide to follow and trying to solve a problem is to see what examples exist where this or similar problems have been tackled before.

    Premium Common law Stare decisis Law

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    judicial precedent

    • 3917 Words
    • 16 Pages

    نشاته‬ judicial precedent Kulliyyathu Dhirasaathil Islamiyya Shariah and law Degree Year two Thaareekhul Qaanoon Semester one J u d i c i a l Pr e c e d e n t Lecturer: Abdul Jaleel Hussain Ali Didi(2009202) 27 March 2011 Ali didi Sharia and law degree year two 1 ‫تاريخ القانون و نشاته‬ judicial precedent Contents 1- Introduction………………………………………………………………………………01 2- Introduction of judicial precedent………………………………………..………………02 3- History of judicial precedent…………………………………………………

    Free Common law Precedent Stare decisis

    • 3917 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial precedent

    • 1316 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judicial Precedent is another important source of law‚ it is an independent source of law‚ where there are no legislations on the particular point in statute Books‚ and Judicial Precedent works great. Judicial precedent has been accepted as one of the important sources of law in most of the legal systems. It is also a continuous‚ growing source of law. According to Salmond‚ the doctrine of precedent has two meanings‚ namely (1) in a loose sense precedent includes merely reported case-law which may

    Free Common law Precedent Law

    • 1316 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judicial Precedent

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Question(A) JUDICIAL PRECEDENT Judicial Precedent is a decision of the court used as a source for future decision making. In Judicial Precedent the decision made in superiors are binding on subsequent cases in lower courts on the same or similar facts. The doctrine of judicial Precedent did not become fully established until the second half of the nineteenth century. In the Common law Courts in the United Kingdom the procedure was to apply the theory of the common law‚ which as simply

    Premium Common law Supreme court Court

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judicial Precedent

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PRECEDENT: Stare Decisis - Stand by the Decision The doctrine of judicial precedent is based on the principle of stare decisis‚ this means that like cases should be treated alike. Once a point of law has been decided in a particular case‚ that law must be applied in all future cases containing the same material facts. For example in the case “Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)‚ The House of Lords held that the manufacturer owed the duty of care to the ultimate consumer of the product. This set a binding

    Premium Stare decisis Appeal Common law

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Precedent

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Judicial precedent: A judgment of a court of law cited as an authority for deciding a similar set of facts; a case which serves as authority for the legal principle embodied in its decision. The common law has developed by broadening down from precedent to precedent. A judicial precedent is a decision of the court used as a source for future decision making. This is known as stare decisis (to stand upon decisions) and by which precedents are authoritative and binding and must be followed. In giving

    Free Common law Precedent Stare decisis

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judicial Precedent

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    OF BINDING PRECEDENT INTRODUCTION The doctrine of binding precedent means the process whereby judges follow previously decided cases where the facts are of sufficient similarity. The doctrine of judicial precedent involves an application of the principle of stare decisis i.e.‚ to stand by the decided. In practice‚ this means that inferior courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases. This provides consistency and predictability in the law. RATIO DECIDENDI

    Premium Stare decisis Case law Precedent

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial Precedent

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT - LAW MAKING POTENTIAL More Judicial Precedent Resources: Judicial Precedent - Lecture Notes #1   THE JUDGES’ ROLE IN PRECEDENT The old view of the judges’ role was that they were merely ’declaring’ the existing law (the ’declaratory theory’). Lord Esher stated in Willis v Baddeley [1892] 2 QB 324: "There is ... no such thing as judge-made law‚ for the judges do not make the law‚ though they frequently have to apply existing law to circumstances as to which it has not

    Premium Common law Stare decisis Law

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
Previous
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50