does not protect a legitimate interest. Since the ordinance affects interstate commerce‚ does not serve a legitimate state interest‚ and there is evidence that a majority of the Council members denied the request in violation of Commerce Clause‚ the court should rule the ordinance and the denial of Pike’s request
Premium United States Congress United States Constitution Commerce Clause
a "whites only" car of a Louisiana train‚ and refused to move to the car for blacks and was then arrested. The Court had to decide whether the Louisiana law was unconstitutional under the 14th amendment. The Court ruled that the state law was within its constitutional boundaries. The majority of this case supported the state-imposed racial segregation. The Court based their final decision on the separate but equal doctrine and agreed that the state had separate facilities for blacks and whites‚ which
Premium Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Plessy v. Ferguson Brown v. Board of Education
Presidents way of protecting and preserving the United States Constitution during the War on Terror were civil liberties violated‚ and should habeas corpus been suspended. Detaining individuals for a suspected crime and not giving them their day in court is in violation of the Constitution. Habeas corpus was implemented in the Constitution to ensure that individual would not be unlawfully imprisoned. Presidents have used their war time power to suspend the habeas corpus‚ is this violating civil rights
Premium Supreme Court of the United States President of the United States George W. Bush
The Supreme Court case‚ Ingraham v. Wright‚ was a turning point along the topic of education and schooling. James Ingraham was an eighth grader in a Florida public school. James failed to answer a question fast enough and was sent to Principal Willie Wright’s office for discipline. James refused to admit to not answering a question‚ he was then subject to twenty strikes from a wooden paddle. James went to see his doctor about the matter and was ordered to stay out of school to recover from his
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Jury
Case: Near v. Minnesota 1931 U.S. Supreme Court Parties Jay Near (Plaintiff) State of Minnesota (Defendant) Facts: A publication‚ The Saturday Press‚ published an article alleging that City officials of Minneapolis were complaisant with gangsters who were engaged in illegal activities in the city. A Minnesota law was in effect which allowed the state courts to enjoin a publication which was engaged in a public nuisance. To be a nuisance the publisher had to be printing material that was malicious
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
enforcement gathered evidence through wiretaps to arrest suspected criminals‚ issues regarding the protection from illegal search and seizure arose within the courts. Judiciary examination of the Fourth Amendment asked the question of whether
Premium
Ferguson Supreme Court
Premium Jim Crow laws Plessy v. Ferguson Racial segregation
Virginia is a United States Supreme Court case which laws prohibited interracial marriage. The case was brought to Mildred and Richard Loving‚ a white man and a black woman‚ who were sentenced to a year in prison for being married. The marriage violated the anti-miscegenation law‚ which
Premium Marriage Miscegenation Race
Korematsu V. United States was a court case during the time of World War II. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor‚ people of Japanese descent were considered threats. As a result‚ Franklin Roosevelt issued the Executive Order 9066 on February 19‚ 1942. This Order demanded that each and every person of Japanese descent be moved to internment camps‚ regardless of citizenship. Fred Korematsu‚ a Japanese American citizen‚ refused to leave his home to go to the internment camp. Therefore‚ he was convicted
Premium United States World War II President of the United States
transactions of information ("Findlaw’s United States Supreme Court Case And Opinions."). The FBI agents then proceeded to attach an eavesdropping device to the outside of the phone booth to record his conversations. With all the recoding that the FBI could get‚ they charged Katz with an eight - count indictment for the illegal transmission of wagering information to several states and he was convicted of those charges ("Findlaw’s United States Supreme Court Case And Opinions."). Katz filed an appeal
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution