1. Case Name‚ Citation‚ and Court Internet Solutions Corp. v. Marshall LEXIS 2826I (2008) The District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2. Key Facts A. Internet Solutions Corp. (ISC)‚ which operates employment recruiting and Internet advertising websites‚ has its principal place of business in Florida. B. Tabatha Marshall‚ a resident of the State of Washington‚ was sued by ISC for making false and defamatory statements on her website. C. Marshall filed a motion to dismiss asserting
Premium Appeal Civil procedure Jurisdiction
United Parcel Service‚ Inc.” case‚ Peggy Young was employed as a part-time delivery driver for UPS. Although all drivers were required to be able to lift items weighing up to 70 pounds as an essential function of their jobs‚ the plaintiff’s duties generally included carrying lighter
Premium Gender Employment Woman
Case Study: The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Executive Summary Today‚ The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) is one of the biggest banking institutions with its capabilities to provide world-class services whilst maintaining its reputation as a top financial services provider in the banking industry. Its leadership in this market is remarkable‚ and so are the ways the bank’s governing body has been able to manage the complexities‚ challenges and changes that come with the industry. Understanding that
Premium Bank
CASE NAME: Commissioner of Police of Montserrat v Cavanaugh (Brian) CITATION: [2005] UKPC 28‚ 66 WIR 206‚ [2005] All ER (D) 110 (Jul) FACTS On 18 July 1995‚ the Soufriere Hills volcano on Montserrat became active. On 3 April 1996‚ by virtue of his powers under s 3 of the Leeward Islands (Emergency Powers) Order in Council 1959‚ SRO 2206 of 1959‚ the Governor declared that a state of public emergency existed and made the Emergency Powers Regulations 1996 (No 3)‚ SRO 26 of 1996‚ which were amended
Premium United States President of the United States United States Department of Homeland Security
Assignment #2 Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority Dr. Edward Sherbert HRM 510 May 5‚ 2013 What where the legal issues in this case? The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of color‚ as well as national origin‚ sex‚ religion. This law applies to any employers with 15 or more employees including the local state‚ government‚ employment agencies‚ labor organizations and federal government jobs.
Premium United States Law Civil and political rights
ii. Hypothetical 2: Accident at the gun range—P v. DC Shooting Range FACTS: Plaintiff sues DC Shooting range‚ where he is a regular‚ for its failure to prevent X‚ a high-ranking member of the gun-owner’s association affiliated with DC Shooting‚ from entering the range with a gun despite under the influence of alcohol‚ causing him to carelessly handle his weapon and accidentally shooting Plaintiff’s arm. Plaintiff built his prima facie case by alleging that on the day of the incident‚ defendant’s
Premium Law Tort Tort law
Pat Employee‚ submits the following Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. I. INTRODUCTION This Court should grant the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment because this Court should apply the law of East Kansas. This case involves a conflict of law issue because West Kansas’s law provides that worker’s compensation is the exclusive remedy for employees‚ who are victims of intentional torts‚ while East Kansas says that worker’s compensation is not the exclusive remedy
Premium Conflict of laws Choice of law Jurisdiction
Introduction Royal Dutch Shell plc (Shell) is one of global leading energy and petrochemical companies. Its foundation dated back to 19 Century but it fully formed after merger of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport in 1907. Now‚ Shell‚ headquartered in The Hague‚ operates in more than 140 countries or areas and employs approximately 87‚000 staffs. Shell businesses expand from upstream to downstream: it is engaged in exploration‚ production‚ refining‚ transportation and retailing of gas‚ oil‚ oil derivatives
Premium Petroleum Renewable energy
The case we were provided with was Abu V. Shell Company. In this case Abu and Shell company signed a contract of 10 years on the basis of the statement by Shell company experts that the station would be able to sell 900 000 liters of petrol per year. The approximate amount was provided on the basis of being direct access to the service station from Main street. A decision made by the local council announced that there would be a change in the traffic dierect access ‚ Shell company continued the contract
Premium Contract Contract Contract law
friend‚ who’s a lawyer.” Is NHA allowed to do that‚ per Confidentiality Agreement and her Employment Agreement? Probably not. I need to remind him about that. The case NHA is talking about is Falls Garden Condo. Ass’n‚ Inc. v. Falls Homeowners Ass’n‚ Inc.‚ 107 A.3d 1183 (Md. 2015)‚ which can be found on Westlaw Next and Lexis Nexis. The case is from the Court of Appeals of Maryland and it does not bind the companies across the entire country‚ but only those domiciled in or otherwise attached to Maryland
Premium Law Contract Lawyer